关于压入式和阻断式二硅酸锂局部冠的随机对照临床试验:四年回顾

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2024-04-01
Edoardo Ferrari-Cagidiaco, Giulia Verniani, Andrew Keeling, Ferdinando Zarone, Roberto Sorrentino, Daniele Manfredini, Marco Ferrari
{"title":"关于压入式和阻断式二硅酸锂局部冠的随机对照临床试验:四年回顾","authors":"Edoardo Ferrari-Cagidiaco, Giulia Verniani, Andrew Keeling, Ferdinando Zarone, Roberto Sorrentino, Daniele Manfredini, Marco Ferrari","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate clinical performances of two lithium disilicate systems (Initial LiSi press vs Initial LiSi Block, GC Co.) using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) evaluation criteria and survival rates after 4 years of clinical service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Partial adhesive crowns on natural abutment posterior teeth were made on 60 subjects who were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1: Initial LiSi press and Group 2: Initial LiSi Block. Fabrication of partial crowns was made with full analog and digital procedure in Groups 1 and 2 respectively. The restorations were followed-up for 1 and 4 years, and the modified USPHS evaluation was performed at baseline and each recall together with periodontal evaluation. Contingency tables to assess for significant differences of success over time in each group and time-dependent Cox regression to test for differences between the two groups were used and the level of significance was set at P< 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding modified USPHS scores, all evaluated parameters showed Alpha or Bravo and no Charlie was recorded. No statistically significant difference emerged between the two groups in any of the assessed variables (P> 0.05). No statistically significant difference between scores recorded at the baseline and each recall. All modified USPHS scores were compatible with the outcome of clinical success and no one restoration was replaced or repaired, and the survival rate was 100% after 4 years of clinical service. No difference was found between traditional and digital procedure to fabricate the crowns. The two lithium disilicate materials showed similar results after 4 years of clinical service.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The crowns made with the two tested lithium disilicate materials with analog and digital procedures showed 100% survival after 4 years of clinical service with no statistically significant difference using the modified USPHS scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized controlled clinical trial on press and block lithium disilicate partial crowns: A 4-year recall.\",\"authors\":\"Edoardo Ferrari-Cagidiaco, Giulia Verniani, Andrew Keeling, Ferdinando Zarone, Roberto Sorrentino, Daniele Manfredini, Marco Ferrari\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate clinical performances of two lithium disilicate systems (Initial LiSi press vs Initial LiSi Block, GC Co.) using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) evaluation criteria and survival rates after 4 years of clinical service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Partial adhesive crowns on natural abutment posterior teeth were made on 60 subjects who were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1: Initial LiSi press and Group 2: Initial LiSi Block. Fabrication of partial crowns was made with full analog and digital procedure in Groups 1 and 2 respectively. The restorations were followed-up for 1 and 4 years, and the modified USPHS evaluation was performed at baseline and each recall together with periodontal evaluation. Contingency tables to assess for significant differences of success over time in each group and time-dependent Cox regression to test for differences between the two groups were used and the level of significance was set at P< 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding modified USPHS scores, all evaluated parameters showed Alpha or Bravo and no Charlie was recorded. No statistically significant difference emerged between the two groups in any of the assessed variables (P> 0.05). No statistically significant difference between scores recorded at the baseline and each recall. All modified USPHS scores were compatible with the outcome of clinical success and no one restoration was replaced or repaired, and the survival rate was 100% after 4 years of clinical service. No difference was found between traditional and digital procedure to fabricate the crowns. The two lithium disilicate materials showed similar results after 4 years of clinical service.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The crowns made with the two tested lithium disilicate materials with analog and digital procedures showed 100% survival after 4 years of clinical service with no statistically significant difference using the modified USPHS scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用修改后的美国公共卫生署(USPHS)评估标准,评估两种二硅酸锂系统(Initial LiSi press 与 Initial LiSi Block,GC Co.)的临床表现以及临床使用 4 年后的存活率:方法:将 60 名受试者随机分为两组,在天然基台后牙上制作部分粘接冠:第 1 组:初始 LiSi 按压;第 2 组:初始 LiSi 块。第一组和第二组分别采用全模拟和数字程序制作局部牙冠。对修复体进行了 1 年和 4 年的随访,并在基线和每次随访时进行了改良 USPHS 评估以及牙周评估。使用或然率表评估各组成功率随时间变化的显著差异,使用时间依赖性 Cox 回归检验两组之间的差异,显著性水平设定为 P< 0.05:在改良 USPHS 评分方面,所有评估参数均显示为 Alpha 或 Bravo,无 Charlie 记录。两组之间在任何评估变量上都没有出现明显的统计学差异(P>0.05)。基线和每次回顾时记录的分数之间没有明显的统计学差异。所有修改后的 USPHS 评分均与临床成功结果相符,没有一个修复体被更换或修复,临床服务 4 年后的存活率为 100%。制作牙冠的传统方法和数字化方法没有差异。两种二硅酸锂材料在临床使用 4 年后的效果相似:临床意义:使用两种受测二硅酸锂材料制作的牙冠,在使用模拟和数字程序4年后,存活率均为100%,使用修正的USPHS评分没有统计学意义上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A randomized controlled clinical trial on press and block lithium disilicate partial crowns: A 4-year recall.

Purpose: To evaluate clinical performances of two lithium disilicate systems (Initial LiSi press vs Initial LiSi Block, GC Co.) using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) evaluation criteria and survival rates after 4 years of clinical service.

Methods: Partial adhesive crowns on natural abutment posterior teeth were made on 60 subjects who were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1: Initial LiSi press and Group 2: Initial LiSi Block. Fabrication of partial crowns was made with full analog and digital procedure in Groups 1 and 2 respectively. The restorations were followed-up for 1 and 4 years, and the modified USPHS evaluation was performed at baseline and each recall together with periodontal evaluation. Contingency tables to assess for significant differences of success over time in each group and time-dependent Cox regression to test for differences between the two groups were used and the level of significance was set at P< 0.05.

Results: Regarding modified USPHS scores, all evaluated parameters showed Alpha or Bravo and no Charlie was recorded. No statistically significant difference emerged between the two groups in any of the assessed variables (P> 0.05). No statistically significant difference between scores recorded at the baseline and each recall. All modified USPHS scores were compatible with the outcome of clinical success and no one restoration was replaced or repaired, and the survival rate was 100% after 4 years of clinical service. No difference was found between traditional and digital procedure to fabricate the crowns. The two lithium disilicate materials showed similar results after 4 years of clinical service.

Clinical significance: The crowns made with the two tested lithium disilicate materials with analog and digital procedures showed 100% survival after 4 years of clinical service with no statistically significant difference using the modified USPHS scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
期刊最新文献
A comparison of polishing systems and thermal cycling on the surface roughness and color stability of a single-shade resin composite. Charcoal dentifrices: A laboratory study of their safety and efficacy. Current landscape of research on whitening toothpastes and their effects on dental hard tissue. Effects of salivary contamination on the shear bond strengths of universal adhesives to dentin. Framework's marginal adaptation evaluation of fixed partial denture using conventional and digital impression techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1