腹腔镜翻修胃底折叠术后的长期效果:对194名复发性食管裂孔疝患者的回顾性单中心分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Esophagus Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1007/s10388-024-01060-0
Björn Siemssen, Florian Hentschel, Marius Jonathan Ibach
{"title":"腹腔镜翻修胃底折叠术后的长期效果:对194名复发性食管裂孔疝患者的回顾性单中心分析。","authors":"Björn Siemssen, Florian Hentschel, Marius Jonathan Ibach","doi":"10.1007/s10388-024-01060-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After laparoscopic fundoplication, 10-20% of patients experience symptom recurrence-often due to resurgence of the hiatal hernia. The standard surgical treatment for such cases remains laparoscopic revision fundoplication. However, there is little data on the time frame and anatomic patterns of failed fundoplications. Additionally, few large studies exist on the long-term efficacy and safety of laparoscopic revision fundoplication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center, retrospective analysis of 194 consecutive revision fundoplications for recurrent reflux disease due to hiatal hernia, we collected data on time to failure and patterns of failure of the primary operation, as well as on the efficacy and safety of the revision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median time to failure of the primary fundoplication was 3 years. Most hiatal defects were smaller than 5 cm and located anteriorly or concentric around the esophagus. Laparoscopic redo fundoplication was technically successful in all cases. The short-term complication rate was 9%, mainly dysphagia requiring endoscopic intervention. At a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, 77% of patients were symptom-free, 14% required daily PPI, and 9% underwent secondary revision. Cumulative failure rates were 9%, 23%, and 31% at 1, 5, and 10 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of failed fundoplications occur within 3 years of primary surgery, with most patients exhibiting anterior or concentric defects. For these patients, laparoscopic revision fundoplication is a safe procedure with a low rate of short-term complications and satisfactory long-term results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11918,"journal":{"name":"Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":"390-396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term results after laparoscopic revision fundoplication: a retrospective, single-center analysis in 194 patients with recurrent hiatal hernia.\",\"authors\":\"Björn Siemssen, Florian Hentschel, Marius Jonathan Ibach\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10388-024-01060-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After laparoscopic fundoplication, 10-20% of patients experience symptom recurrence-often due to resurgence of the hiatal hernia. The standard surgical treatment for such cases remains laparoscopic revision fundoplication. However, there is little data on the time frame and anatomic patterns of failed fundoplications. Additionally, few large studies exist on the long-term efficacy and safety of laparoscopic revision fundoplication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center, retrospective analysis of 194 consecutive revision fundoplications for recurrent reflux disease due to hiatal hernia, we collected data on time to failure and patterns of failure of the primary operation, as well as on the efficacy and safety of the revision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median time to failure of the primary fundoplication was 3 years. Most hiatal defects were smaller than 5 cm and located anteriorly or concentric around the esophagus. Laparoscopic redo fundoplication was technically successful in all cases. The short-term complication rate was 9%, mainly dysphagia requiring endoscopic intervention. At a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, 77% of patients were symptom-free, 14% required daily PPI, and 9% underwent secondary revision. Cumulative failure rates were 9%, 23%, and 31% at 1, 5, and 10 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of failed fundoplications occur within 3 years of primary surgery, with most patients exhibiting anterior or concentric defects. For these patients, laparoscopic revision fundoplication is a safe procedure with a low rate of short-term complications and satisfactory long-term results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Esophagus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"390-396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-024-01060-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-024-01060-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜胃底折叠术后,10%-20% 的患者会出现症状复发--通常是由于裂孔疝再次复发。针对此类病例的标准手术疗法仍然是腹腔镜胃底折叠术。然而,有关胃底折叠术失败的时间框架和解剖模式的数据很少。此外,关于腹腔镜翻修胃底折叠术的长期疗效和安全性的大型研究也很少:方法:我们对 194 例因食管裂孔疝导致的复发性反流病而进行的连续翻修胃底折叠术进行了单中心回顾性分析,收集了有关初次手术失败时间、失败模式以及翻修手术疗效和安全性的数据:结果:初次胃底折叠术失败的中位时间为3年。大多数食管裂孔缺损小于5厘米,位于食管前方或与食管同心。腹腔镜胃底折叠术在所有病例中均取得了技术上的成功。短期并发症发生率为9%,主要是需要内镜干预的吞咽困难。在平均 4.7 年的随访中,77% 的患者无症状,14% 的患者需要每天服用 PPI,9% 的患者进行了二次翻修。1年、5年和10年的累积失败率分别为9%、23%和31%:大多数胃底折叠手术失败发生在初次手术后的 3 年内,大多数患者表现为前部或同心圆缺损。对于这些患者,腹腔镜胃底折叠术是一种安全的手术,短期并发症发生率低,长期效果令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term results after laparoscopic revision fundoplication: a retrospective, single-center analysis in 194 patients with recurrent hiatal hernia.

Background: After laparoscopic fundoplication, 10-20% of patients experience symptom recurrence-often due to resurgence of the hiatal hernia. The standard surgical treatment for such cases remains laparoscopic revision fundoplication. However, there is little data on the time frame and anatomic patterns of failed fundoplications. Additionally, few large studies exist on the long-term efficacy and safety of laparoscopic revision fundoplication.

Methods: In a single-center, retrospective analysis of 194 consecutive revision fundoplications for recurrent reflux disease due to hiatal hernia, we collected data on time to failure and patterns of failure of the primary operation, as well as on the efficacy and safety of the revision.

Results: The median time to failure of the primary fundoplication was 3 years. Most hiatal defects were smaller than 5 cm and located anteriorly or concentric around the esophagus. Laparoscopic redo fundoplication was technically successful in all cases. The short-term complication rate was 9%, mainly dysphagia requiring endoscopic intervention. At a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, 77% of patients were symptom-free, 14% required daily PPI, and 9% underwent secondary revision. Cumulative failure rates were 9%, 23%, and 31% at 1, 5, and 10 years.

Conclusion: The majority of failed fundoplications occur within 3 years of primary surgery, with most patients exhibiting anterior or concentric defects. For these patients, laparoscopic revision fundoplication is a safe procedure with a low rate of short-term complications and satisfactory long-term results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Esophagus
Esophagus GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Esophagus, the official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, introduces practitioners and researchers to significant studies in the fields of benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, and short articles including technical notes ( How I do it ), which will be peer-reviewed by the editorial board. Letters to the editor are also welcome. Special articles on esophageal diseases will be provided by the editorial board, and proceedings of symposia and workshops will be included in special issues for the Annual Congress of the Society.
期刊最新文献
Circ_DLG1 facilitates cell proliferation and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via upregulating MAP3K9. Investigating the synergistic effects of immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Activation of the tumor cell-intrinsic STING pathway induced by Fusobacterium nucleatum is associated with poor prognosis in esophageal cancer patients. A purely laparoscopic approach can reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. Comparison and validation of the Japanese classification 12th edition and American joint committee on cancer 8th edition on intrathoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1