Felix Claussen, Jozef Al-Gousous, Niloufar Salehi, Mauricio A Garcia, Gordon L Amidon, Peter Langguth
{"title":"在生理碳酸氢盐缓冲液中的溶解度与溶解度。","authors":"Felix Claussen, Jozef Al-Gousous, Niloufar Salehi, Mauricio A Garcia, Gordon L Amidon, Peter Langguth","doi":"10.1007/s11095-024-03702-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phosphate buffer is often used as a replacement for the physiological bicarbonate buffer in pharmaceutical dissolution testing, although there are some discrepancies in their properties making it complicated to extrapolate dissolution results in phosphate to the in vivo situation. This study aims to characterize these discrepancies regarding solubility and dissolution behavior of ionizable compounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The dissolution of an ibuprofen powder with a known particle size distribution was simulated in silico and verified experimentally in vitro at two different doses and in two different buffers (5 mM pH 6.8 bicarbonate and phosphate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that there is a solubility vs. dissolution mismatch in the two buffers. This was accurately predicted by the in-house simulations based on the reversible non-equilibrium (RNE) and the Mooney models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results can be explained by the existence of a relatively large gap between the initial surface pH of the drug and the bulk pH at saturation in bicarbonate but not in phosphate, which is caused by not all the interfacial reactions reaching equilibrium in bicarbonate prior to bulk saturation. This means that slurry pH measurements, while providing surface pH estimates for buffers like phosphate, are poor indicators of surface pH in the intestinal bicarbonate buffer. In addition, it showcases the importance of accounting for the H<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>-CO<sub>2</sub> interconversion kinetics to achieve good predictions of intestinal drug dissolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solubility vs Dissolution in Physiological Bicarbonate Buffer.\",\"authors\":\"Felix Claussen, Jozef Al-Gousous, Niloufar Salehi, Mauricio A Garcia, Gordon L Amidon, Peter Langguth\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11095-024-03702-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phosphate buffer is often used as a replacement for the physiological bicarbonate buffer in pharmaceutical dissolution testing, although there are some discrepancies in their properties making it complicated to extrapolate dissolution results in phosphate to the in vivo situation. This study aims to characterize these discrepancies regarding solubility and dissolution behavior of ionizable compounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The dissolution of an ibuprofen powder with a known particle size distribution was simulated in silico and verified experimentally in vitro at two different doses and in two different buffers (5 mM pH 6.8 bicarbonate and phosphate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that there is a solubility vs. dissolution mismatch in the two buffers. This was accurately predicted by the in-house simulations based on the reversible non-equilibrium (RNE) and the Mooney models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results can be explained by the existence of a relatively large gap between the initial surface pH of the drug and the bulk pH at saturation in bicarbonate but not in phosphate, which is caused by not all the interfacial reactions reaching equilibrium in bicarbonate prior to bulk saturation. This means that slurry pH measurements, while providing surface pH estimates for buffers like phosphate, are poor indicators of surface pH in the intestinal bicarbonate buffer. In addition, it showcases the importance of accounting for the H<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>-CO<sub>2</sub> interconversion kinetics to achieve good predictions of intestinal drug dissolution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116206/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03702-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03702-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Solubility vs Dissolution in Physiological Bicarbonate Buffer.
Background: Phosphate buffer is often used as a replacement for the physiological bicarbonate buffer in pharmaceutical dissolution testing, although there are some discrepancies in their properties making it complicated to extrapolate dissolution results in phosphate to the in vivo situation. This study aims to characterize these discrepancies regarding solubility and dissolution behavior of ionizable compounds.
Methods: The dissolution of an ibuprofen powder with a known particle size distribution was simulated in silico and verified experimentally in vitro at two different doses and in two different buffers (5 mM pH 6.8 bicarbonate and phosphate).
Results: The results showed that there is a solubility vs. dissolution mismatch in the two buffers. This was accurately predicted by the in-house simulations based on the reversible non-equilibrium (RNE) and the Mooney models.
Conclusions: The results can be explained by the existence of a relatively large gap between the initial surface pH of the drug and the bulk pH at saturation in bicarbonate but not in phosphate, which is caused by not all the interfacial reactions reaching equilibrium in bicarbonate prior to bulk saturation. This means that slurry pH measurements, while providing surface pH estimates for buffers like phosphate, are poor indicators of surface pH in the intestinal bicarbonate buffer. In addition, it showcases the importance of accounting for the H2CO3-CO2 interconversion kinetics to achieve good predictions of intestinal drug dissolution.