乳腺癌淋巴结转移的机器学习预测:基于 MRI 的多机构 4D 卷积神经网络的性能。

IF 5.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiology. Imaging cancer Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1148/rycan.230107
Dogan S Polat, Son Nguyen, Paniz Karbasi, Keith Hulsey, Murat Can Cobanoglu, Liqiang Wang, Albert Montillo, Basak E Dogan
{"title":"乳腺癌淋巴结转移的机器学习预测:基于 MRI 的多机构 4D 卷积神经网络的性能。","authors":"Dogan S Polat, Son Nguyen, Paniz Karbasi, Keith Hulsey, Murat Can Cobanoglu, Liqiang Wang, Albert Montillo, Basak E Dogan","doi":"10.1148/rycan.230107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To develop a custom deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for noninvasive prediction of breast cancer nodal metastasis. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed primary invasive breast cancer with known pathologic (pN) and clinical nodal (cN) status who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) breast MRI at the authors' institution between July 2013 and July 2016. Clinicopathologic data (age, estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor 2 status, Ki-67 index, and tumor grade) and cN and pN status were collected. A four-dimensional (4D) CNN model integrating temporal information from dynamic image sets was developed. The convolutional layers learned prognostic image features, which were combined with clinicopathologic measures to predict cN0 versus cN+ and pN0 versus pN+ disease. Performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with fivefold nested cross-validation. Results Data from 350 female patients (mean age, 51.7 years ± 11.9 [SD]) were analyzed. AUC, sensitivity, and specificity values of the 4D hybrid model were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.91), 89% (95% CI: 79%, 93%), and 76% (95% CI: 68%, 88%) for differentiating pN0 versus pN+ and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.82), 80% (95% CI: 77%, 84%), and 62% (95% CI: 58%, 67%), respectively, for differentiating cN0 versus cN+. Conclusion The proposed deep learning model using tumor DCE MR images demonstrated high sensitivity in identifying breast cancer lymph node metastasis and shows promise for potential use as a clinical decision support tool. <b>Keywords:</b> MR Imaging, Breast, Breast Cancer, Breast MRI, Machine Learning, Metastasis, Prognostic Prediction <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>","PeriodicalId":20786,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","volume":"6 3","pages":"e230107"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11148663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Performance of a Multi-institutional MRI-based 4D Convolutional Neural Network.\",\"authors\":\"Dogan S Polat, Son Nguyen, Paniz Karbasi, Keith Hulsey, Murat Can Cobanoglu, Liqiang Wang, Albert Montillo, Basak E Dogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/rycan.230107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose To develop a custom deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for noninvasive prediction of breast cancer nodal metastasis. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed primary invasive breast cancer with known pathologic (pN) and clinical nodal (cN) status who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) breast MRI at the authors' institution between July 2013 and July 2016. Clinicopathologic data (age, estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor 2 status, Ki-67 index, and tumor grade) and cN and pN status were collected. A four-dimensional (4D) CNN model integrating temporal information from dynamic image sets was developed. The convolutional layers learned prognostic image features, which were combined with clinicopathologic measures to predict cN0 versus cN+ and pN0 versus pN+ disease. Performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with fivefold nested cross-validation. Results Data from 350 female patients (mean age, 51.7 years ± 11.9 [SD]) were analyzed. AUC, sensitivity, and specificity values of the 4D hybrid model were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.91), 89% (95% CI: 79%, 93%), and 76% (95% CI: 68%, 88%) for differentiating pN0 versus pN+ and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.82), 80% (95% CI: 77%, 84%), and 62% (95% CI: 58%, 67%), respectively, for differentiating cN0 versus cN+. Conclusion The proposed deep learning model using tumor DCE MR images demonstrated high sensitivity in identifying breast cancer lymph node metastasis and shows promise for potential use as a clinical decision support tool. <b>Keywords:</b> MR Imaging, Breast, Breast Cancer, Breast MRI, Machine Learning, Metastasis, Prognostic Prediction <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology. Imaging cancer\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"e230107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11148663/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology. Imaging cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.230107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.230107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 开发一种定制的深度卷积神经网络(CNN),用于无创预测乳腺癌结节转移。材料与方法 这项回顾性研究纳入了 2013 年 7 月至 2016 年 7 月期间在作者所在机构接受动态对比增强(DCE)乳腺 MRI 检查的新诊断原发性浸润性乳腺癌患者,这些患者具有已知的病理(pN)和临床结节(cN)状态。收集了临床病理数据(年龄、雌激素受体和人类表皮生长因子 2 状态、Ki-67 指数和肿瘤分级)以及 cN 和 pN 状态。开发的四维(4D)CNN 模型整合了动态图像集的时间信息。卷积层学习预后图像特征,并将其与临床病理学指标相结合,预测 cN0 与 cN+ 以及 pN0 与 pN+ 疾病。用接收器工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估性能,并进行五重嵌套交叉验证。结果 分析了 350 名女性患者(平均年龄为 51.7 岁 ± 11.9 [SD])的数据。4D 混合模型区分 pN0 与 pN+ 的 AUC 值、灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.87(95% CI:0.83,0.91)、89%(95% CI:79%,93%)和 76%(95% CI:68%,88%);区分 cN0 与 cN+ 的 AUC 值、灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.79(95% CI:0.76,0.82)、80%(95% CI:77%,84%)和 62%(95% CI:58%,67%)。结论 利用肿瘤 DCE MR 图像建立的深度学习模型在识别乳腺癌淋巴结转移方面表现出较高的灵敏度,有望用作临床决策支持工具。关键词磁共振成像 乳腺癌 乳腺 MRI 机器学习 转移 预后预测 本文有补充材料。以 CC BY 4.0 许可发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine Learning Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Performance of a Multi-institutional MRI-based 4D Convolutional Neural Network.

Purpose To develop a custom deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for noninvasive prediction of breast cancer nodal metastasis. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed primary invasive breast cancer with known pathologic (pN) and clinical nodal (cN) status who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) breast MRI at the authors' institution between July 2013 and July 2016. Clinicopathologic data (age, estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor 2 status, Ki-67 index, and tumor grade) and cN and pN status were collected. A four-dimensional (4D) CNN model integrating temporal information from dynamic image sets was developed. The convolutional layers learned prognostic image features, which were combined with clinicopathologic measures to predict cN0 versus cN+ and pN0 versus pN+ disease. Performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with fivefold nested cross-validation. Results Data from 350 female patients (mean age, 51.7 years ± 11.9 [SD]) were analyzed. AUC, sensitivity, and specificity values of the 4D hybrid model were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.91), 89% (95% CI: 79%, 93%), and 76% (95% CI: 68%, 88%) for differentiating pN0 versus pN+ and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.82), 80% (95% CI: 77%, 84%), and 62% (95% CI: 58%, 67%), respectively, for differentiating cN0 versus cN+. Conclusion The proposed deep learning model using tumor DCE MR images demonstrated high sensitivity in identifying breast cancer lymph node metastasis and shows promise for potential use as a clinical decision support tool. Keywords: MR Imaging, Breast, Breast Cancer, Breast MRI, Machine Learning, Metastasis, Prognostic Prediction Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multifrequency MR Elastography for Tumor Stiffness Outperforms Conventional Imaging and Clinical Variables in Determining Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Endometrial Cancer. Assessing the Value of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in Gastric Mucinous Adenocarcinoma or Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma. External Validation of a Previously Developed Deep Learning-based Prostate Lesion Detection Algorithm on Paired External and In-House Biparametric MRI Scans. Mathematical 3D Liver Model for Surgical versus Ablative Therapy Treatment Planning for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Recommendations from the COLLISION and COLDFIRE Trial Expert Panels. A New Acquisition Protocol for Optimized Dynamic Susceptibility Perfusion Imaging of Brain Tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1