作为入侵植物的矢车菊的同位异化作用和潜在的同位化学物质。

Plant signaling & behavior Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-04-28 DOI:10.1080/15592324.2024.2335025
Shengxiao Wang, Chenyue Wang, Jun Zhang, Kan Jiang, Fang Nian
{"title":"作为入侵植物的矢车菊的同位异化作用和潜在的同位化学物质。","authors":"Shengxiao Wang, Chenyue Wang, Jun Zhang, Kan Jiang, Fang Nian","doi":"10.1080/15592324.2024.2335025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Allelopathy is the main chemical means in the invasion process of exotic plants and one of the key factors in grassland degradation. In this experiment, we investigated the effects of ethyl acetate phase extract (EAE), n-butanol phase extract (BE) and aqueous phase extract (AE) from the aboveground (stems and leaves) and roots of <i>Ligularia sagitta</i> on seed germination and seedling growth of four <i>Gramineae</i> forages (<i>Poa pratensis</i> L. <i>Festuca ovina</i> L. <i>Elymus nutans</i> Griseb. <i>Agropyron cristatum</i> (L.) Gaertn.) in their sympatric domains and one <i>Legosuminae</i> forage (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.). The chemical components in each phase extract of <i>L. sagitta</i> were determined with UHPLC-MS/MS non-targeted metabolomics, and the differential compounds were screened using Orthogonal Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA). Within a set concentration range, EAE significantly inhibited seed germination and seedling growth of four <i>Gramineae</i> forages. BE and AE acted mainly in the seedling growth stage and did not significantly inhibit forage seed germination. <i>P. pratensis</i> was most sensitive to <i>L. sagitta</i> extracts; at 2.0 mg/mL of EAE from roots, germination energy and germination rate of <i>P. pratensis</i> seeds were 0. <i>L. sagitta</i> extracts inhibited the growth of <i>M. sativa</i> seedlings and did not inhibit its seed germination. A total of 904 compounds were identified with UHPLC-MS/MS, among which 31, 64, 81 and 66 metabolites displayed different accumulation patterns in the four comparison groups (R.EAE vs. R.BE, R.EAE vs. R.AE, SL.EAE vs. SL.BE, SL.EAE vs. SL.AE), respectively. In particular, 9 compounds were found to be common up-regulated differential metabolites in the four comparison groups and were enriched in EAE. Additionally, N,N-dimethylaniline, Caffeic acid, 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde and cis-9-Octadecenoic acid as potential allelochemicals in <i>L. sagitta</i>. The results of this study support efforts at finding alternative control plants for the restoration of poisonous grass-type degraded grasslands.</p>","PeriodicalId":94172,"journal":{"name":"Plant signaling & behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allelopathy and potential allelochemicals of <i>Ligularia sagitta</i> as an invasive plant.\",\"authors\":\"Shengxiao Wang, Chenyue Wang, Jun Zhang, Kan Jiang, Fang Nian\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15592324.2024.2335025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Allelopathy is the main chemical means in the invasion process of exotic plants and one of the key factors in grassland degradation. In this experiment, we investigated the effects of ethyl acetate phase extract (EAE), n-butanol phase extract (BE) and aqueous phase extract (AE) from the aboveground (stems and leaves) and roots of <i>Ligularia sagitta</i> on seed germination and seedling growth of four <i>Gramineae</i> forages (<i>Poa pratensis</i> L. <i>Festuca ovina</i> L. <i>Elymus nutans</i> Griseb. <i>Agropyron cristatum</i> (L.) Gaertn.) in their sympatric domains and one <i>Legosuminae</i> forage (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.). The chemical components in each phase extract of <i>L. sagitta</i> were determined with UHPLC-MS/MS non-targeted metabolomics, and the differential compounds were screened using Orthogonal Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA). Within a set concentration range, EAE significantly inhibited seed germination and seedling growth of four <i>Gramineae</i> forages. BE and AE acted mainly in the seedling growth stage and did not significantly inhibit forage seed germination. <i>P. pratensis</i> was most sensitive to <i>L. sagitta</i> extracts; at 2.0 mg/mL of EAE from roots, germination energy and germination rate of <i>P. pratensis</i> seeds were 0. <i>L. sagitta</i> extracts inhibited the growth of <i>M. sativa</i> seedlings and did not inhibit its seed germination. A total of 904 compounds were identified with UHPLC-MS/MS, among which 31, 64, 81 and 66 metabolites displayed different accumulation patterns in the four comparison groups (R.EAE vs. R.BE, R.EAE vs. R.AE, SL.EAE vs. SL.BE, SL.EAE vs. SL.AE), respectively. In particular, 9 compounds were found to be common up-regulated differential metabolites in the four comparison groups and were enriched in EAE. Additionally, N,N-dimethylaniline, Caffeic acid, 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde and cis-9-Octadecenoic acid as potential allelochemicals in <i>L. sagitta</i>. The results of this study support efforts at finding alternative control plants for the restoration of poisonous grass-type degraded grasslands.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant signaling & behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057658/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant signaling & behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2024.2335025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant signaling & behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2024.2335025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

异化作用是外来植物入侵过程中的主要化学手段,也是草地退化的关键因素之一。在本实验中,我们研究了乙酸乙酯相提取物(EAE)、正丁醇相提取物(BE)和水相提取物(AE)对四种禾本科牧草(Poa pratensis L. Festuca ovina L. Elymus nutans Griseb.Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn.)以及一种豆科牧草(Medicago sativa L.)。利用超高效液相色谱-质谱/质谱非靶向代谢组学测定了矢车菊各阶段提取物中的化学成分,并利用正交偏最小二乘法判别分析(OPLS-DA)筛选了差异化合物。在设定的浓度范围内,EAE 能显著抑制四种禾本科牧草的种子萌发和幼苗生长。BE 和 AE 主要作用于幼苗生长阶段,对牧草种子萌发的抑制作用不明显。矢车菊对矢车菊提取物最为敏感;在根部提取 2.0 毫克/毫升的 EAE 时,矢车菊种子的萌发能和萌发率均为 0;矢车菊提取物抑制荠菜幼苗的生长,但不抑制其种子萌发。用 UHPLC-MS/MS 鉴定了 904 种化合物,其中 31、64、81 和 66 种代谢物在四个比较组(R.EAE 与 R.BE、R.EAE 与 R.AE、SL.EAE 与 SL.BE、SL.EAE 与 SL.AE)中分别显示出不同的积累模式。其中,有9种化合物是四个对比组中常见的上调差异代谢物,并在EAE中富集。此外,N,N-二甲基苯胺、咖啡酸、4-羟基苯甲酸、4-羟基苯甲醛和顺式-9-十八碳烯酸是矢车菊中潜在的等位化学物质。这项研究的结果支持了为恢复毒草型退化草地寻找替代控制植物的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Allelopathy and potential allelochemicals of Ligularia sagitta as an invasive plant.

Allelopathy is the main chemical means in the invasion process of exotic plants and one of the key factors in grassland degradation. In this experiment, we investigated the effects of ethyl acetate phase extract (EAE), n-butanol phase extract (BE) and aqueous phase extract (AE) from the aboveground (stems and leaves) and roots of Ligularia sagitta on seed germination and seedling growth of four Gramineae forages (Poa pratensis L. Festuca ovina L. Elymus nutans Griseb. Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn.) in their sympatric domains and one Legosuminae forage (Medicago sativa L.). The chemical components in each phase extract of L. sagitta were determined with UHPLC-MS/MS non-targeted metabolomics, and the differential compounds were screened using Orthogonal Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA). Within a set concentration range, EAE significantly inhibited seed germination and seedling growth of four Gramineae forages. BE and AE acted mainly in the seedling growth stage and did not significantly inhibit forage seed germination. P. pratensis was most sensitive to L. sagitta extracts; at 2.0 mg/mL of EAE from roots, germination energy and germination rate of P. pratensis seeds were 0. L. sagitta extracts inhibited the growth of M. sativa seedlings and did not inhibit its seed germination. A total of 904 compounds were identified with UHPLC-MS/MS, among which 31, 64, 81 and 66 metabolites displayed different accumulation patterns in the four comparison groups (R.EAE vs. R.BE, R.EAE vs. R.AE, SL.EAE vs. SL.BE, SL.EAE vs. SL.AE), respectively. In particular, 9 compounds were found to be common up-regulated differential metabolites in the four comparison groups and were enriched in EAE. Additionally, N,N-dimethylaniline, Caffeic acid, 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde and cis-9-Octadecenoic acid as potential allelochemicals in L. sagitta. The results of this study support efforts at finding alternative control plants for the restoration of poisonous grass-type degraded grasslands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Response of photosynthesis and electrical reactions of wheat plants upon the action of magnetic fields in the Schumann resonance frequency band. Reciprocal modulation of responses to nitrate starvation and hypoxia in roots and leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. Cold priming on pathogen susceptibility in the Arabidopsis eds1 mutant background requires a functional stromal Ascorbate Peroxidase. Editorial: plant-microbial symbiosis toward sustainable food security. Nitric oxide in plants: an insight on redox activity and responses toward abiotic stress signaling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1