体积编码孔径 X 射线衍射成像系统的分辨率分析。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/XST-230244
Zachary Gude, Anuj J Kapadia, Joel A Greenberg
{"title":"体积编码孔径 X 射线衍射成像系统的分辨率分析。","authors":"Zachary Gude, Anuj J Kapadia, Joel A Greenberg","doi":"10.3233/XST-230244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A coded aperture X-ray diffraction (XRD) imaging system can measure the X-ray diffraction form factor from an object in three dimensions -X, Y and Z (depth), broadening the potential application of this technology. However, to optimize XRD systems for specific applications, it is critical to understand how to predict and quantify system performance for each use case.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this work is to present and validate 3D spatial resolution models for XRD imaging systems with a detector-side coded aperture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A fan beam coded aperture XRD system was used to scan 3D printed resolution phantoms placed at various locations throughout the system's field of view. The multiplexed scatter data were reconstructed using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm, and the resulting volumetric images were evaluated using multiple resolution criteria to compare against the known phantom resolution. We considered the full width at half max and Sparrow criterion as measures of the resolution and compared our results against analytical resolution models from the literature as well as a new theory for predicting the system resolution based on geometric arguments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We show that our experimental measurements are bounded by the multitude of theoretical resolution predictions, which accurately predict the observed trends and order of magnitude of the spatial and form factor resolutions. However, we find that the expected and observed resolution can vary by approximately a factor of two depending on the choice of metric and model considered. We observe depth resolutions of 7-16 mm and transverse resolutions of 0.6-2 mm for objects throughout the field of view. Furthermore, we observe tradeoffs between the spatial resolution and XRD form factor resolution as a function of sample location.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The theories evaluated in this study provide a useful framework for estimating the 3D spatial resolution of a detector side coded aperture XRD imaging system. The assumptions and simplifications required by these theories can impact the overall accuracy of describing a particular system, but they also can add to the generalizability of their predictions. Furthermore, understanding the implications of the assumptions behind each theory can help predict performance, as shown by our data's placement between the conservative and idealized theories, and better guide future systems for optimized designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"809-822"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resolution analysis of a volumetric coded aperture X-ray diffraction imaging system.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Gude, Anuj J Kapadia, Joel A Greenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/XST-230244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A coded aperture X-ray diffraction (XRD) imaging system can measure the X-ray diffraction form factor from an object in three dimensions -X, Y and Z (depth), broadening the potential application of this technology. However, to optimize XRD systems for specific applications, it is critical to understand how to predict and quantify system performance for each use case.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this work is to present and validate 3D spatial resolution models for XRD imaging systems with a detector-side coded aperture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A fan beam coded aperture XRD system was used to scan 3D printed resolution phantoms placed at various locations throughout the system's field of view. The multiplexed scatter data were reconstructed using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm, and the resulting volumetric images were evaluated using multiple resolution criteria to compare against the known phantom resolution. We considered the full width at half max and Sparrow criterion as measures of the resolution and compared our results against analytical resolution models from the literature as well as a new theory for predicting the system resolution based on geometric arguments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We show that our experimental measurements are bounded by the multitude of theoretical resolution predictions, which accurately predict the observed trends and order of magnitude of the spatial and form factor resolutions. However, we find that the expected and observed resolution can vary by approximately a factor of two depending on the choice of metric and model considered. We observe depth resolutions of 7-16 mm and transverse resolutions of 0.6-2 mm for objects throughout the field of view. Furthermore, we observe tradeoffs between the spatial resolution and XRD form factor resolution as a function of sample location.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The theories evaluated in this study provide a useful framework for estimating the 3D spatial resolution of a detector side coded aperture XRD imaging system. The assumptions and simplifications required by these theories can impact the overall accuracy of describing a particular system, but they also can add to the generalizability of their predictions. Furthermore, understanding the implications of the assumptions behind each theory can help predict performance, as shown by our data's placement between the conservative and idealized theories, and better guide future systems for optimized designs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"809-822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-230244\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-230244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:编码孔径 X 射线衍射 (XRD) 成像系统可以从 X、Y 和 Z(深度)三个维度测量物体的 X 射线衍射形式因子,从而拓宽了这一技术的潜在应用领域。然而,要针对特定应用优化 XRD 系统,关键是要了解如何针对每种使用情况预测和量化系统性能:这项工作的目的是提出并验证带有探测器侧编码孔径的 XRD 成像系统的三维空间分辨率模型:方法:使用扇形光束编码孔径 XRD 系统扫描放置在整个系统视场不同位置的三维打印分辨率模型。使用基于模型的迭代重建算法对多路复用散射数据进行重建,并使用多种分辨率标准对生成的体积图像进行评估,以便与已知的模型分辨率进行比较。我们将半最大全宽和斯帕罗标准作为分辨率的衡量标准,并将我们的结果与文献中的分析分辨率模型以及基于几何参数预测系统分辨率的新理论进行了比较:结果:我们的实验测量结果表明,我们的实验测量结果受到了众多理论分辨率预测值的限制,这些预测值准确地预测了观察到的空间分辨率和形状系数分辨率的趋势和数量级。然而,我们发现,根据所考虑的度量标准和模型的选择,预期分辨率和观察到的分辨率可能会有大约 2 倍的差异。我们观察到,在整个视场中,物体的深度分辨率为 7-16 毫米,横向分辨率为 0.6-2 毫米。此外,我们还观察到空间分辨率和 XRD 形状因子分辨率之间的权衡与样品位置的函数关系:本研究中评估的理论为估算探测器侧编码孔径 XRD 成像系统的三维空间分辨率提供了一个有用的框架。这些理论所需的假设和简化会影响描述特定系统的整体准确性,但也会增加其预测的通用性。此外,了解每种理论背后假设的含义有助于预测性能(如我们的数据在保守理论和理想化理论之间的位置所示),并更好地指导未来系统的优化设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resolution analysis of a volumetric coded aperture X-ray diffraction imaging system.

Background: A coded aperture X-ray diffraction (XRD) imaging system can measure the X-ray diffraction form factor from an object in three dimensions -X, Y and Z (depth), broadening the potential application of this technology. However, to optimize XRD systems for specific applications, it is critical to understand how to predict and quantify system performance for each use case.

Objective: The purpose of this work is to present and validate 3D spatial resolution models for XRD imaging systems with a detector-side coded aperture.

Methods: A fan beam coded aperture XRD system was used to scan 3D printed resolution phantoms placed at various locations throughout the system's field of view. The multiplexed scatter data were reconstructed using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm, and the resulting volumetric images were evaluated using multiple resolution criteria to compare against the known phantom resolution. We considered the full width at half max and Sparrow criterion as measures of the resolution and compared our results against analytical resolution models from the literature as well as a new theory for predicting the system resolution based on geometric arguments.

Results: We show that our experimental measurements are bounded by the multitude of theoretical resolution predictions, which accurately predict the observed trends and order of magnitude of the spatial and form factor resolutions. However, we find that the expected and observed resolution can vary by approximately a factor of two depending on the choice of metric and model considered. We observe depth resolutions of 7-16 mm and transverse resolutions of 0.6-2 mm for objects throughout the field of view. Furthermore, we observe tradeoffs between the spatial resolution and XRD form factor resolution as a function of sample location.

Conclusion: The theories evaluated in this study provide a useful framework for estimating the 3D spatial resolution of a detector side coded aperture XRD imaging system. The assumptions and simplifications required by these theories can impact the overall accuracy of describing a particular system, but they also can add to the generalizability of their predictions. Furthermore, understanding the implications of the assumptions behind each theory can help predict performance, as shown by our data's placement between the conservative and idealized theories, and better guide future systems for optimized designs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
23.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Research areas within the scope of the journal include: Interaction of x-rays with matter: x-ray phenomena, biological effects of radiation, radiation safety and optical constants X-ray sources: x-rays from synchrotrons, x-ray lasers, plasmas, and other sources, conventional or unconventional Optical elements: grazing incidence optics, multilayer mirrors, zone plates, gratings, other diffraction optics Optical instruments: interferometers, spectrometers, microscopes, telescopes, microprobes
期刊最新文献
Industrial digital radiographic image denoising based on improved KBNet. Research on the effectiveness of multi-view slice correction strategy based on deep learning in high pitch helical CT reconstruction. A fully linearized ADMM algorithm for optimization based image reconstruction. A reconstruction method for ptychography based on residual dense network. Can AI generate diagnostic reports for radiologist approval on CXR images? A multi-reader and multi-case observer performance study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1