个性化神经调控治疗抑郁症的新前景:基于断层扫描的靶向治疗的启示。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.04.007
{"title":"个性化神经调控治疗抑郁症的新前景:基于断层扫描的靶向治疗的启示。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Deep brain stimulation<span> has shown promise in treating individual patients with treatment-resistant depression, but larger-scale trials have been less successful. Here, we created what is, to our knowledge, the largest meta-analysis with individual patient data to date to explore whether the use of tractography enhances the efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We systematically reviewed 1823 articles, selecting 32 that contributed data from 366 patients. We stratified the individual patient data based on stimulation target and use of tractography. Using 2-way type III analysis of variance, Welch’s 2-sample <em>t</em> tests, and mixed-effects linear regression models, we evaluated changes in depression severity 1 year (9–15 months) postoperatively and at last follow-up (4 weeks to 8 years) as assessed by depression scales.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Tractography was used for medial forebrain bundle (MFB) (</span><em>n</em> = 17 tractography/32 total), subcallosal cingulate (SCC) (<em>n</em> = 39 tractography/241 total), and ventral capsule/ventral striatum (<em>n</em><span> = 3 tractography/41 total) targets; it was not used for bed nucleus of stria terminalis (</span><em>n</em><span> = 11), lateral habenula (</span><em>n</em> = 10), and inferior thalamic peduncle (<em>n</em> = 1). Across all patients, tractography significantly improved mean depression scores at 1 year (<em>p</em> &lt; .001) and last follow-up (<em>p</em><span> = .009). Within the target cohorts, tractography improved depression scores at 1 year for both MFB and SCC, though significance was met only at the α = 0.1 level (SCC: β = 15.8%, </span><em>p</em> = .09; MFB: β = 52.4%, <em>p</em> = .10). Within the tractography cohort, patients with MFB tractography showed greater improvement than patients with SCC tractography (72.42 ± 7.17% vs. 54.78 ± 4.08%) at 1 year (<em>p</em> = .044).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings underscore the promise of tractography in deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression as a method for personalization of therapy, supporting its inclusion in future trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54231,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","volume":"9 8","pages":"Pages 754-764"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging Outlook on Personalized Neuromodulation for Depression: Insights From Tractography-Based Targeting\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.04.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Deep brain stimulation<span> has shown promise in treating individual patients with treatment-resistant depression, but larger-scale trials have been less successful. Here, we created what is, to our knowledge, the largest meta-analysis with individual patient data to date to explore whether the use of tractography enhances the efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We systematically reviewed 1823 articles, selecting 32 that contributed data from 366 patients. We stratified the individual patient data based on stimulation target and use of tractography. Using 2-way type III analysis of variance, Welch’s 2-sample <em>t</em> tests, and mixed-effects linear regression models, we evaluated changes in depression severity 1 year (9–15 months) postoperatively and at last follow-up (4 weeks to 8 years) as assessed by depression scales.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Tractography was used for medial forebrain bundle (MFB) (</span><em>n</em> = 17 tractography/32 total), subcallosal cingulate (SCC) (<em>n</em> = 39 tractography/241 total), and ventral capsule/ventral striatum (<em>n</em><span> = 3 tractography/41 total) targets; it was not used for bed nucleus of stria terminalis (</span><em>n</em><span> = 11), lateral habenula (</span><em>n</em> = 10), and inferior thalamic peduncle (<em>n</em> = 1). Across all patients, tractography significantly improved mean depression scores at 1 year (<em>p</em> &lt; .001) and last follow-up (<em>p</em><span> = .009). Within the target cohorts, tractography improved depression scores at 1 year for both MFB and SCC, though significance was met only at the α = 0.1 level (SCC: β = 15.8%, </span><em>p</em> = .09; MFB: β = 52.4%, <em>p</em> = .10). Within the tractography cohort, patients with MFB tractography showed greater improvement than patients with SCC tractography (72.42 ± 7.17% vs. 54.78 ± 4.08%) at 1 year (<em>p</em> = .044).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings underscore the promise of tractography in deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression as a method for personalization of therapy, supporting its inclusion in future trials.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"9 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 754-764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224001095\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224001095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑深部刺激(DBS)在治疗抗药性抑郁症(TRD)方面已显示出个体疗效,但更大规模的试验却不太成功。在此,我们利用患者个体数据(IPD)进行了迄今为止最大规模的荟萃分析,以探讨使用脑束成像是否能增强 DBS 治疗 TRD 的疗效:我们系统回顾了1823篇文章,选择了32篇提供了366名患者数据的文章。我们根据刺激目标和束流成像的使用情况对 IPD 进行了分层。利用双向 III 型方差分析(ANOVA)、韦尔奇两样本 t 检验和混合效应线性回归模型,我们评估了手术后 9-15 个月(1-Y)和最后一次随访(LFU)(4 周 - 8 年)抑郁量表评估的抑郁严重程度的变化:内侧前脑束(MFB,n=17/32)、胼胝体下扣带回(SCC,n=39/241)和腹侧囊/内侧纹状体(VC/VS,n=3/41)靶点使用了牵引术;而纹状体末端床核(n=11)、外侧帽状体(n=10)和丘脑下蒂(n=1)未使用牵引术。在所有患者中,1-Y时的平均抑郁评分均有明显改善(p结论:我们的研究结果表明,DBS治疗TRD的束描有望成为个性化治疗的一种方法,支持将其纳入未来的试验中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emerging Outlook on Personalized Neuromodulation for Depression: Insights From Tractography-Based Targeting

Background

Deep brain stimulation has shown promise in treating individual patients with treatment-resistant depression, but larger-scale trials have been less successful. Here, we created what is, to our knowledge, the largest meta-analysis with individual patient data to date to explore whether the use of tractography enhances the efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

Methods

We systematically reviewed 1823 articles, selecting 32 that contributed data from 366 patients. We stratified the individual patient data based on stimulation target and use of tractography. Using 2-way type III analysis of variance, Welch’s 2-sample t tests, and mixed-effects linear regression models, we evaluated changes in depression severity 1 year (9–15 months) postoperatively and at last follow-up (4 weeks to 8 years) as assessed by depression scales.

Results

Tractography was used for medial forebrain bundle (MFB) (n = 17 tractography/32 total), subcallosal cingulate (SCC) (n = 39 tractography/241 total), and ventral capsule/ventral striatum (n = 3 tractography/41 total) targets; it was not used for bed nucleus of stria terminalis (n = 11), lateral habenula (n = 10), and inferior thalamic peduncle (n = 1). Across all patients, tractography significantly improved mean depression scores at 1 year (p < .001) and last follow-up (p = .009). Within the target cohorts, tractography improved depression scores at 1 year for both MFB and SCC, though significance was met only at the α = 0.1 level (SCC: β = 15.8%, p = .09; MFB: β = 52.4%, p = .10). Within the tractography cohort, patients with MFB tractography showed greater improvement than patients with SCC tractography (72.42 ± 7.17% vs. 54.78 ± 4.08%) at 1 year (p = .044).

Conclusions

Our findings underscore the promise of tractography in deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression as a method for personalization of therapy, supporting its inclusion in future trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
247
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging is an official journal of the Society for Biological Psychiatry, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal focuses on studies using the tools and constructs of cognitive neuroscience, including the full range of non-invasive neuroimaging and human extra- and intracranial physiological recording methodologies. It publishes both basic and clinical studies, including those that incorporate genetic data, pharmacological challenges, and computational modeling approaches. The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents In This Issue Peak Alpha Frequency in Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Healthy Volunteers: Associations With Visual Information Processing and Cognition Macrostructural Brain Morphology as Moderator of the Relationship Between Pandemic-Related Stress and Internalizing Symptomology During COVID-19 in High-Risk Adolescents Impairment of Visual Fixation and Preparatory Saccade Control in Borderline Personality Disorder With and Without Comorbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1