R. T. Dave, J. R. Burr, M. C. Ross, C. F. Lietz, J. W. Bennewitz
{"title":"基于爆炸的火箭推进系统的特征时标","authors":"R. T. Dave, J. R. Burr, M. C. Ross, C. F. Lietz, J. W. Bennewitz","doi":"10.1007/s00193-024-01174-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Characteristic timescales for rotating detonation rocket engines (RDREs) are described in this study. Traveling detonations within RDREs create a complex reacting flow field involving processes spanning a range of timescales. Specifically, characteristic times associated with combustion kinetics (detonation and deflagration), injection (e.g., flow recovery), flow (e.g., mixture residence time), and acoustic modes are quantified using first-principle analyses to characterize the RDRE-relevant physics. Three fuels are investigated including methane, hydrogen, and rocket-grade kerosene RP-2 for equivalence ratios from 0.25 to 3 and chamber pressures from 0.51 to 10.13 MPa, as well as for a case study with a standard RDRE geometry. Detonation chemical timescales range from 0.05 to 1000 ns for the induction and reaction times; detonation-based chemical equilibrium, however, spans a larger range from approximately 0.5 to <span>\\(200~\\upmu \\)</span>s for the flow condition and fuel. This timescale sensitivity has implications regarding maximizing detonative heat release, especially with pre-detonation deflagration in real systems. Representative synthetic detonation wave profiles are input into a simplified injector model that describes the periodic choking/unchoking process and shows that injection timescales typically range from 5 to <span>\\(50~\\upmu \\)</span>s depending on injector stiffness; for detonations and low-stiffness injectors, target reactant flow rates may not recover prior to the next wave arrival, preventing uniform mixing. This partially explains the detonation velocity deficit observed in RDREs, as with the standard RDRE analyzed in this study. Finally, timescales tied to chamber geometry including residence time are on the order of 100–10,000 <span>\\(\\upmu \\)</span>s and acoustic resonance times are 10–<span>\\(1000~\\upmu \\)</span>s. Overall, this work establishes characteristic time and length scales for the relevant physics, a valuable step in developing tools to optimize future RDRE designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":775,"journal":{"name":"Shock Waves","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristic timescales for detonation-based rocket propulsion systems\",\"authors\":\"R. T. Dave, J. R. Burr, M. C. Ross, C. F. Lietz, J. W. Bennewitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00193-024-01174-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Characteristic timescales for rotating detonation rocket engines (RDREs) are described in this study. Traveling detonations within RDREs create a complex reacting flow field involving processes spanning a range of timescales. Specifically, characteristic times associated with combustion kinetics (detonation and deflagration), injection (e.g., flow recovery), flow (e.g., mixture residence time), and acoustic modes are quantified using first-principle analyses to characterize the RDRE-relevant physics. Three fuels are investigated including methane, hydrogen, and rocket-grade kerosene RP-2 for equivalence ratios from 0.25 to 3 and chamber pressures from 0.51 to 10.13 MPa, as well as for a case study with a standard RDRE geometry. Detonation chemical timescales range from 0.05 to 1000 ns for the induction and reaction times; detonation-based chemical equilibrium, however, spans a larger range from approximately 0.5 to <span>\\\\(200~\\\\upmu \\\\)</span>s for the flow condition and fuel. This timescale sensitivity has implications regarding maximizing detonative heat release, especially with pre-detonation deflagration in real systems. Representative synthetic detonation wave profiles are input into a simplified injector model that describes the periodic choking/unchoking process and shows that injection timescales typically range from 5 to <span>\\\\(50~\\\\upmu \\\\)</span>s depending on injector stiffness; for detonations and low-stiffness injectors, target reactant flow rates may not recover prior to the next wave arrival, preventing uniform mixing. This partially explains the detonation velocity deficit observed in RDREs, as with the standard RDRE analyzed in this study. Finally, timescales tied to chamber geometry including residence time are on the order of 100–10,000 <span>\\\\(\\\\upmu \\\\)</span>s and acoustic resonance times are 10–<span>\\\\(1000~\\\\upmu \\\\)</span>s. Overall, this work establishes characteristic time and length scales for the relevant physics, a valuable step in developing tools to optimize future RDRE designs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shock Waves\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shock Waves\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-024-01174-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock Waves","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-024-01174-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characteristic timescales for detonation-based rocket propulsion systems
Characteristic timescales for rotating detonation rocket engines (RDREs) are described in this study. Traveling detonations within RDREs create a complex reacting flow field involving processes spanning a range of timescales. Specifically, characteristic times associated with combustion kinetics (detonation and deflagration), injection (e.g., flow recovery), flow (e.g., mixture residence time), and acoustic modes are quantified using first-principle analyses to characterize the RDRE-relevant physics. Three fuels are investigated including methane, hydrogen, and rocket-grade kerosene RP-2 for equivalence ratios from 0.25 to 3 and chamber pressures from 0.51 to 10.13 MPa, as well as for a case study with a standard RDRE geometry. Detonation chemical timescales range from 0.05 to 1000 ns for the induction and reaction times; detonation-based chemical equilibrium, however, spans a larger range from approximately 0.5 to \(200~\upmu \)s for the flow condition and fuel. This timescale sensitivity has implications regarding maximizing detonative heat release, especially with pre-detonation deflagration in real systems. Representative synthetic detonation wave profiles are input into a simplified injector model that describes the periodic choking/unchoking process and shows that injection timescales typically range from 5 to \(50~\upmu \)s depending on injector stiffness; for detonations and low-stiffness injectors, target reactant flow rates may not recover prior to the next wave arrival, preventing uniform mixing. This partially explains the detonation velocity deficit observed in RDREs, as with the standard RDRE analyzed in this study. Finally, timescales tied to chamber geometry including residence time are on the order of 100–10,000 \(\upmu \)s and acoustic resonance times are 10–\(1000~\upmu \)s. Overall, this work establishes characteristic time and length scales for the relevant physics, a valuable step in developing tools to optimize future RDRE designs.
期刊介绍:
Shock Waves provides a forum for presenting and discussing new results in all fields where shock and detonation phenomena play a role. The journal addresses physicists, engineers and applied mathematicians working on theoretical, experimental or numerical issues, including diagnostics and flow visualization.
The research fields considered include, but are not limited to, aero- and gas dynamics, acoustics, physical chemistry, condensed matter and plasmas, with applications encompassing materials sciences, space sciences, geosciences, life sciences and medicine.
Of particular interest are contributions which provide insights into fundamental aspects of the techniques that are relevant to more than one specific research community.
The journal publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles and short notes, as well as comments on papers already published in this journal. Occasionally concise meeting reports of interest to the Shock Waves community are published.