经颅磁刺激线圈定向的新视角:有针对性的叙述性综述。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.04.018
{"title":"经颅磁刺激线圈定向的新视角:有针对性的叙述性综述。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.04.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to treat several neuropsychiatric disorders including depression, where it is effective in approximately one half of patients for whom pharmacological approaches have failed. Treatment response is related to stimulation parameters such as the stimulation frequency, pattern, intensity, location, total number of pulses and sessions applied, and target brain network engagement. One critical but underexplored component of the stimulation procedure is the orientation or yaw angle of the commonly used figure-of-eight TMS coil, which is known to impact neuronal response to TMS. However, coil orientation has remained largely unchanged since TMS was first used to treat depression and continues to be based on motor cortex anatomy, which may not be optimal for the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex treatment site. In this targeted narrative review, we evaluate experimental, clinical, and computational evidence indicating that optimizing coil orientation may improve TMS treatment outcomes. The properties of the electric field induced by TMS, the changes to this field caused by the differing conductivities of head tissues, and the interaction between coil orientation and the underlying cortical anatomy are summarized. We describe evidence that the magnitude and site of cortical activation, surrogate markers of TMS dosing and brain network targeting considered central in clinical response to TMS, are influenced by coil orientation. We suggest that coil orientation should be considered when applying therapeutic TMS and propose several approaches to optimizing this potentially important treatment parameter.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54231,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","volume":"9 8","pages":"Pages 744-753"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224001204/pdfft?md5=5e9f5e4014fc26be9013b5e0bb4d53c3&pid=1-s2.0-S2451902224001204-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Angle on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil Orientation: A Targeted Narrative Review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.04.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to treat several neuropsychiatric disorders including depression, where it is effective in approximately one half of patients for whom pharmacological approaches have failed. Treatment response is related to stimulation parameters such as the stimulation frequency, pattern, intensity, location, total number of pulses and sessions applied, and target brain network engagement. One critical but underexplored component of the stimulation procedure is the orientation or yaw angle of the commonly used figure-of-eight TMS coil, which is known to impact neuronal response to TMS. However, coil orientation has remained largely unchanged since TMS was first used to treat depression and continues to be based on motor cortex anatomy, which may not be optimal for the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex treatment site. In this targeted narrative review, we evaluate experimental, clinical, and computational evidence indicating that optimizing coil orientation may improve TMS treatment outcomes. The properties of the electric field induced by TMS, the changes to this field caused by the differing conductivities of head tissues, and the interaction between coil orientation and the underlying cortical anatomy are summarized. We describe evidence that the magnitude and site of cortical activation, surrogate markers of TMS dosing and brain network targeting considered central in clinical response to TMS, are influenced by coil orientation. We suggest that coil orientation should be considered when applying therapeutic TMS and propose several approaches to optimizing this potentially important treatment parameter.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"9 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 744-753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224001204/pdfft?md5=5e9f5e4014fc26be9013b5e0bb4d53c3&pid=1-s2.0-S2451902224001204-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224001204\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224001204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经颅磁刺激(TMS)用于治疗包括抑郁症在内的多种神经精神疾病,对大约一半药物治疗无效的患者有效。治疗反应与刺激参数有关,如刺激频率、模式、强度、位置、脉冲总数和应用疗程,以及目标脑网络参与度。刺激过程中一个关键但未被充分探索的因素是常用的八字形 TMS 线圈的方向或偏航角,众所周知,这将影响神经元对 TMS 的反应。然而,自 TMS 首次用于治疗抑郁症以来,线圈的方向基本保持不变,并继续以运动皮层解剖学为基础,这可能不是背外侧前额叶皮层治疗部位的最佳方向。这篇有针对性的叙述性综述评估了实验、临床和计算证据,这些证据表明,优化线圈方向有可能改善 TMS 治疗效果。文中总结了 TMS 所诱导电场的特性、头部组织的不同电导率所引起的电场变化,以及线圈方向与皮层底层解剖结构之间的相互作用。我们描述了皮质激活的程度和部位受线圈方向影响的证据,线圈方向是 TMS 剂量和脑网络靶向的替代标记,被认为是 TMS 临床反应的核心。我们建议在应用治疗性 TMS 时应考虑线圈方向,并提出了几种优化这一潜在重要治疗参数的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A New Angle on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil Orientation: A Targeted Narrative Review

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to treat several neuropsychiatric disorders including depression, where it is effective in approximately one half of patients for whom pharmacological approaches have failed. Treatment response is related to stimulation parameters such as the stimulation frequency, pattern, intensity, location, total number of pulses and sessions applied, and target brain network engagement. One critical but underexplored component of the stimulation procedure is the orientation or yaw angle of the commonly used figure-of-eight TMS coil, which is known to impact neuronal response to TMS. However, coil orientation has remained largely unchanged since TMS was first used to treat depression and continues to be based on motor cortex anatomy, which may not be optimal for the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex treatment site. In this targeted narrative review, we evaluate experimental, clinical, and computational evidence indicating that optimizing coil orientation may improve TMS treatment outcomes. The properties of the electric field induced by TMS, the changes to this field caused by the differing conductivities of head tissues, and the interaction between coil orientation and the underlying cortical anatomy are summarized. We describe evidence that the magnitude and site of cortical activation, surrogate markers of TMS dosing and brain network targeting considered central in clinical response to TMS, are influenced by coil orientation. We suggest that coil orientation should be considered when applying therapeutic TMS and propose several approaches to optimizing this potentially important treatment parameter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
247
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging is an official journal of the Society for Biological Psychiatry, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal focuses on studies using the tools and constructs of cognitive neuroscience, including the full range of non-invasive neuroimaging and human extra- and intracranial physiological recording methodologies. It publishes both basic and clinical studies, including those that incorporate genetic data, pharmacological challenges, and computational modeling approaches. The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents In This Issue Peak Alpha Frequency in Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Healthy Volunteers: Associations With Visual Information Processing and Cognition Macrostructural Brain Morphology as Moderator of the Relationship Between Pandemic-Related Stress and Internalizing Symptomology During COVID-19 in High-Risk Adolescents Impairment of Visual Fixation and Preparatory Saccade Control in Borderline Personality Disorder With and Without Comorbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1