Nilo Guliberto Martins Chavarry, Pedro Villas Boas Abreu, Eduardo Jorge Feres-Filho, Daniele Masterson Tavares Pereira, Lucianne Cople Maia, Rafael Scaf De Molon
{"title":"阿仑膦酸钠对拔牙后牙槽骨愈合的影响:动物研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Nilo Guliberto Martins Chavarry, Pedro Villas Boas Abreu, Eduardo Jorge Feres-Filho, Daniele Masterson Tavares Pereira, Lucianne Cople Maia, Rafael Scaf De Molon","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review was to answer the following question: \"Does alendronate, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, improve or impair alveolar socket healing after tooth extraction in animal models\"? To this end, a systematic review of the literature was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, as well as in the gray literature up to May 2023. Preclinical studies that evaluated alveolar healing after tooth extraction and the intake of sodium alendronate compared with placebo were included. Two investigators were responsible for screening the articles independently, extracting the data, and assessing their quality through the SYRCLE's RoB tool for randomized trials in animal studies. The study selection process, study characteristics, risk of bias in studies, impact of alendronate on bone healing, and certainty of evidence were described in text and table formats. Methodological differences among the studies were restricted to the synthesis methods. The synthesis of qualitative results followed the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline. From the 19 included studies, five were considered to have low risk, three were of unclear risk, and eleven presented a high risk of bias. The studies were considered heterogeneous regarding alendronate posology, including its dosage and route of administration. Furthermore, a variety of animal species, different age ranges, diverse teeth extracted, and exposure or not to ovariectomy contributed to the lack of parity of the selected studies. Our results indicated that alendronate monotherapy negatively affects the early phase of wound healing after tooth extraction in preclinical studies, suggesting that the bone resorption process after tooth extraction in animals treated with alendronate might impair the bone healing process of the extraction socket. In conclusion, alendronate administration restrains bone resorption, thereby delaying alveolar socket healing . Future studies should be conducted to validate these findings and to better understand the effects of alendronate therapy on oral tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"38 ","pages":"e038"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of sodium alendronate on socket healing after tooth extraction: a systematic review of animal studies.\",\"authors\":\"Nilo Guliberto Martins Chavarry, Pedro Villas Boas Abreu, Eduardo Jorge Feres-Filho, Daniele Masterson Tavares Pereira, Lucianne Cople Maia, Rafael Scaf De Molon\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review was to answer the following question: \\\"Does alendronate, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, improve or impair alveolar socket healing after tooth extraction in animal models\\\"? To this end, a systematic review of the literature was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, as well as in the gray literature up to May 2023. Preclinical studies that evaluated alveolar healing after tooth extraction and the intake of sodium alendronate compared with placebo were included. Two investigators were responsible for screening the articles independently, extracting the data, and assessing their quality through the SYRCLE's RoB tool for randomized trials in animal studies. The study selection process, study characteristics, risk of bias in studies, impact of alendronate on bone healing, and certainty of evidence were described in text and table formats. Methodological differences among the studies were restricted to the synthesis methods. The synthesis of qualitative results followed the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline. From the 19 included studies, five were considered to have low risk, three were of unclear risk, and eleven presented a high risk of bias. The studies were considered heterogeneous regarding alendronate posology, including its dosage and route of administration. Furthermore, a variety of animal species, different age ranges, diverse teeth extracted, and exposure or not to ovariectomy contributed to the lack of parity of the selected studies. Our results indicated that alendronate monotherapy negatively affects the early phase of wound healing after tooth extraction in preclinical studies, suggesting that the bone resorption process after tooth extraction in animals treated with alendronate might impair the bone healing process of the extraction socket. In conclusion, alendronate administration restrains bone resorption, thereby delaying alveolar socket healing . Future studies should be conducted to validate these findings and to better understand the effects of alendronate therapy on oral tissues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian oral research\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"e038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376628/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian oral research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本系统综述旨在回答以下问题:"阿仑膦酸钠是一种含氮的双膦酸盐,在动物模型中是否会改善或损害拔牙后牙槽骨的愈合?为此,我们在 PubMed、Scopus、LILACS、Web of Science 以及截至 2023 年 5 月的灰色文献中进行了系统的文献综述。纳入了评估拔牙后牙槽骨愈合以及阿仑膦酸钠摄入量与安慰剂摄入量比较的临床前研究。两名研究人员负责独立筛选文章、提取数据,并通过 SYRCLE 的 RoB 工具评估其质量,该工具适用于动物研究中的随机试验。研究的筛选过程、研究特点、研究的偏倚风险、阿仑膦酸钠对骨愈合的影响以及证据的确定性均以文字和表格的形式进行了描述。各研究在方法上的差异仅限于综合方法。定性结果的综述遵循了无荟萃分析综述(SWiM)报告指南。在纳入的 19 项研究中,5 项被认为风险较低,3 项风险不明确,11 项存在较高的偏倚风险。这些研究被认为在阿仑膦酸钠的体位学方面存在异质性,包括其剂量和给药途径。此外,动物种类不同、年龄范围不同、拔除的牙齿不同、是否暴露于卵巢切除术等因素也导致了所选研究缺乏均等性。我们的研究结果表明,在临床前研究中,阿仑膦酸钠单药治疗对拔牙后伤口愈合的早期阶段有负面影响,这表明使用阿仑膦酸钠治疗的动物拔牙后的骨吸收过程可能会损害拔牙窝的骨愈合过程。总之,阿仑膦酸钠能抑制骨吸收,从而延缓牙槽窝愈合。今后的研究应验证这些发现,并更好地了解阿仑膦酸钠疗法对口腔组织的影响。
The effects of sodium alendronate on socket healing after tooth extraction: a systematic review of animal studies.
The aim of this systematic review was to answer the following question: "Does alendronate, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, improve or impair alveolar socket healing after tooth extraction in animal models"? To this end, a systematic review of the literature was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, as well as in the gray literature up to May 2023. Preclinical studies that evaluated alveolar healing after tooth extraction and the intake of sodium alendronate compared with placebo were included. Two investigators were responsible for screening the articles independently, extracting the data, and assessing their quality through the SYRCLE's RoB tool for randomized trials in animal studies. The study selection process, study characteristics, risk of bias in studies, impact of alendronate on bone healing, and certainty of evidence were described in text and table formats. Methodological differences among the studies were restricted to the synthesis methods. The synthesis of qualitative results followed the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline. From the 19 included studies, five were considered to have low risk, three were of unclear risk, and eleven presented a high risk of bias. The studies were considered heterogeneous regarding alendronate posology, including its dosage and route of administration. Furthermore, a variety of animal species, different age ranges, diverse teeth extracted, and exposure or not to ovariectomy contributed to the lack of parity of the selected studies. Our results indicated that alendronate monotherapy negatively affects the early phase of wound healing after tooth extraction in preclinical studies, suggesting that the bone resorption process after tooth extraction in animals treated with alendronate might impair the bone healing process of the extraction socket. In conclusion, alendronate administration restrains bone resorption, thereby delaying alveolar socket healing . Future studies should be conducted to validate these findings and to better understand the effects of alendronate therapy on oral tissues.