Kholoud Maswadi, Ali Alhazmi, Faisal Alshanketi, Christopher Ifeanyi Eke
{"title":"利用浅层学习和深度学习模型对用于灾难响应的推文分类系统进行实证研究","authors":"Kholoud Maswadi, Ali Alhazmi, Faisal Alshanketi, Christopher Ifeanyi Eke","doi":"10.1007/s12652-024-04807-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Disaster-based tweets during an emergency consist of a variety of information on people who have been hurt or killed, people who are lost or discovered, infrastructure and utilities destroyed; this information can assist governmental and humanitarian organizations in prioritizing their aid and rescue efforts. It is crucial to build a model that can categorize these tweets into distinct types due to their massive volume so as to better organize rescue and relief effort and save lives. In this study, Twitter data of 2013 Queensland flood and 2015 Nepal earthquake has been classified as disaster or non-disaster by employing three classes of models. The first model is performed using the lexical feature based on Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF). The classification was performed using five classification algorithms such as DT, LR, SVM, RF, while Ensemble Voting was used to produce the outcome of the models. The second model uses shallow classifiers in conjunction with several features, including lexical (TF-IDF), hashtag, POS, and GloVe embedding. The third set of the model utilized deep learning algorithms including LSTM, LSTM, and GRU, using BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) for constructing semantic word embedding to learn the context. The key performance evaluation metrics such as accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision were employed to measure and compare the three sets of models for disaster response classification on two publicly available Twitter datasets. By performing a comprehensive empirical evaluation of the tweet classification technique across different disaster kinds, the predictive performance shows that the best accuracy was achieved with DT algorithm which attained the highest performance accuracy followed by Bi-LSTM models for disaster response classification by attaining the best accuracy of 96.46% and 96.40% on the Queensland flood dataset; DT algorithm also attained 78.3% accuracy on the Nepal earthquake dataset based on the majority-voting ensemble respectively. Thus, this research contributes by investigating the integration of deep and shallow learning models effectively in a tweet classification system designed for disaster response. Examining the ways that these two methods work seamlessly offers insights into how to best utilize their complimentary advantages to increase the robustness and accuracy of locating suitable data in disaster crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The empirical study of tweet classification system for disaster response using shallow and deep learning models\",\"authors\":\"Kholoud Maswadi, Ali Alhazmi, Faisal Alshanketi, Christopher Ifeanyi Eke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12652-024-04807-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Disaster-based tweets during an emergency consist of a variety of information on people who have been hurt or killed, people who are lost or discovered, infrastructure and utilities destroyed; this information can assist governmental and humanitarian organizations in prioritizing their aid and rescue efforts. It is crucial to build a model that can categorize these tweets into distinct types due to their massive volume so as to better organize rescue and relief effort and save lives. In this study, Twitter data of 2013 Queensland flood and 2015 Nepal earthquake has been classified as disaster or non-disaster by employing three classes of models. The first model is performed using the lexical feature based on Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF). The classification was performed using five classification algorithms such as DT, LR, SVM, RF, while Ensemble Voting was used to produce the outcome of the models. The second model uses shallow classifiers in conjunction with several features, including lexical (TF-IDF), hashtag, POS, and GloVe embedding. The third set of the model utilized deep learning algorithms including LSTM, LSTM, and GRU, using BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) for constructing semantic word embedding to learn the context. The key performance evaluation metrics such as accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision were employed to measure and compare the three sets of models for disaster response classification on two publicly available Twitter datasets. By performing a comprehensive empirical evaluation of the tweet classification technique across different disaster kinds, the predictive performance shows that the best accuracy was achieved with DT algorithm which attained the highest performance accuracy followed by Bi-LSTM models for disaster response classification by attaining the best accuracy of 96.46% and 96.40% on the Queensland flood dataset; DT algorithm also attained 78.3% accuracy on the Nepal earthquake dataset based on the majority-voting ensemble respectively. Thus, this research contributes by investigating the integration of deep and shallow learning models effectively in a tweet classification system designed for disaster response. Examining the ways that these two methods work seamlessly offers insights into how to best utilize their complimentary advantages to increase the robustness and accuracy of locating suitable data in disaster crisis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-024-04807-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-024-04807-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
The empirical study of tweet classification system for disaster response using shallow and deep learning models
Disaster-based tweets during an emergency consist of a variety of information on people who have been hurt or killed, people who are lost or discovered, infrastructure and utilities destroyed; this information can assist governmental and humanitarian organizations in prioritizing their aid and rescue efforts. It is crucial to build a model that can categorize these tweets into distinct types due to their massive volume so as to better organize rescue and relief effort and save lives. In this study, Twitter data of 2013 Queensland flood and 2015 Nepal earthquake has been classified as disaster or non-disaster by employing three classes of models. The first model is performed using the lexical feature based on Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF). The classification was performed using five classification algorithms such as DT, LR, SVM, RF, while Ensemble Voting was used to produce the outcome of the models. The second model uses shallow classifiers in conjunction with several features, including lexical (TF-IDF), hashtag, POS, and GloVe embedding. The third set of the model utilized deep learning algorithms including LSTM, LSTM, and GRU, using BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) for constructing semantic word embedding to learn the context. The key performance evaluation metrics such as accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision were employed to measure and compare the three sets of models for disaster response classification on two publicly available Twitter datasets. By performing a comprehensive empirical evaluation of the tweet classification technique across different disaster kinds, the predictive performance shows that the best accuracy was achieved with DT algorithm which attained the highest performance accuracy followed by Bi-LSTM models for disaster response classification by attaining the best accuracy of 96.46% and 96.40% on the Queensland flood dataset; DT algorithm also attained 78.3% accuracy on the Nepal earthquake dataset based on the majority-voting ensemble respectively. Thus, this research contributes by investigating the integration of deep and shallow learning models effectively in a tweet classification system designed for disaster response. Examining the ways that these two methods work seamlessly offers insights into how to best utilize their complimentary advantages to increase the robustness and accuracy of locating suitable data in disaster crisis.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of JAIHC is to provide a high profile, leading edge forum for academics, industrial professionals, educators and policy makers involved in the field to contribute, to disseminate the most innovative researches and developments of all aspects of ambient intelligence and humanized computing, such as intelligent/smart objects, environments/spaces, and systems. The journal discusses various technical, safety, personal, social, physical, political, artistic and economic issues. The research topics covered by the journal are (but not limited to):
Pervasive/Ubiquitous Computing and Applications
Cognitive wireless sensor network
Embedded Systems and Software
Mobile Computing and Wireless Communications
Next Generation Multimedia Systems
Security, Privacy and Trust
Service and Semantic Computing
Advanced Networking Architectures
Dependable, Reliable and Autonomic Computing
Embedded Smart Agents
Context awareness, social sensing and inference
Multi modal interaction design
Ergonomics and product prototyping
Intelligent and self-organizing transportation networks & services
Healthcare Systems
Virtual Humans & Virtual Worlds
Wearables sensors and actuators