MET 和 ESR 基因的共表达对乳腺癌预后指标和临床结果的影响:对 METABRIC 数据集的分析

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1155/2024/2582341
Nehad M. Ayoub, Ghaith M. Al-Taani, Amer E. Alkhalifa, Dalia R. Ibrahim, Aymen Shatnawi
{"title":"MET 和 ESR 基因的共表达对乳腺癌预后指标和临床结果的影响:对 METABRIC 数据集的分析","authors":"Nehad M. Ayoub,&nbsp;Ghaith M. Al-Taani,&nbsp;Amer E. Alkhalifa,&nbsp;Dalia R. Ibrahim,&nbsp;Aymen Shatnawi","doi":"10.1155/2024/2582341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Purpose</i>. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Exploring new prognostic and therapeutic targets in patients with breast cancer is essential. This study investigated the expression of MET, ESR1, and ESR2 genes and their association with clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with breast cancer. <i>Methods</i>. The METABRIC dataset for breast cancer was obtained from the cBioPortal public domain. Gene expression data for <i>MET</i>, <i>ESR1</i>, and <i>ESR2</i>, as well as the putative copy number alterations (CNAs) for <i>MET</i> were retrieved. <i>Results</i>. The <i>MET</i> mRNA expression levels correlated inversely with the expression levels of <i>ESR1</i> and positively with the expression levels of <i>ESR2</i> (<i>r</i> = −0.379, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and <i>r</i> = 0.066, and <i>p</i> = 0.004, respectively). The <i>ESR1</i> mRNA expression was significantly different among <i>MET</i> CNAs groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Patients with high <i>MET</i>/<i>ESR1</i> coexpression had favorable clinicopathologic tumor characteristics and prognosticators compared to low <i>MET/ESR1</i> coexpression in terms of greater age at diagnosis, reduced Nottingham Prognostic Index, lower tumor grade, hormone receptor positivity, HER2-negative status, and luminal subtype (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In contrast, patients with high <i>MET</i>/<i>ESR2</i> coexpression had unfavorable tumor features and advanced prognosticators compared to patients with low <i>MET</i>/<i>ESR2</i> coexpression (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). No significant difference in overall survival was observed based on the <i>MET/ESR</i> coexpression status. However, when data were stratified based on the treatment type (chemotherapy and hormonal therapy), survival was significantly different based on the coexpression status of <i>MET/ESR</i>. <i>Conclusions</i>. Findings from our study add to the growing evidence on the potential crosstalk between MET and estrogen receptors in breast cancer. The expression of the MET/ESR genes could be a novel prognosticator and calls for future studies to evaluate the impact of combinational treatment approaches with MET inhibitors and endocrine drugs in breast cancer.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2582341","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of the Coexpression of MET and ESR Genes on Prognosticators and Clinical Outcomes of Breast Cancer: An Analysis for the METABRIC Dataset\",\"authors\":\"Nehad M. Ayoub,&nbsp;Ghaith M. Al-Taani,&nbsp;Amer E. Alkhalifa,&nbsp;Dalia R. Ibrahim,&nbsp;Aymen Shatnawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/2582341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Purpose</i>. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Exploring new prognostic and therapeutic targets in patients with breast cancer is essential. This study investigated the expression of MET, ESR1, and ESR2 genes and their association with clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with breast cancer. <i>Methods</i>. The METABRIC dataset for breast cancer was obtained from the cBioPortal public domain. Gene expression data for <i>MET</i>, <i>ESR1</i>, and <i>ESR2</i>, as well as the putative copy number alterations (CNAs) for <i>MET</i> were retrieved. <i>Results</i>. The <i>MET</i> mRNA expression levels correlated inversely with the expression levels of <i>ESR1</i> and positively with the expression levels of <i>ESR2</i> (<i>r</i> = −0.379, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and <i>r</i> = 0.066, and <i>p</i> = 0.004, respectively). The <i>ESR1</i> mRNA expression was significantly different among <i>MET</i> CNAs groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Patients with high <i>MET</i>/<i>ESR1</i> coexpression had favorable clinicopathologic tumor characteristics and prognosticators compared to low <i>MET/ESR1</i> coexpression in terms of greater age at diagnosis, reduced Nottingham Prognostic Index, lower tumor grade, hormone receptor positivity, HER2-negative status, and luminal subtype (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In contrast, patients with high <i>MET</i>/<i>ESR2</i> coexpression had unfavorable tumor features and advanced prognosticators compared to patients with low <i>MET</i>/<i>ESR2</i> coexpression (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). No significant difference in overall survival was observed based on the <i>MET/ESR</i> coexpression status. However, when data were stratified based on the treatment type (chemotherapy and hormonal therapy), survival was significantly different based on the coexpression status of <i>MET/ESR</i>. <i>Conclusions</i>. Findings from our study add to the growing evidence on the potential crosstalk between MET and estrogen receptors in breast cancer. The expression of the MET/ESR genes could be a novel prognosticator and calls for future studies to evaluate the impact of combinational treatment approaches with MET inhibitors and endocrine drugs in breast cancer.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Journal\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2582341\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2582341\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2582341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的乳腺癌是一种异质性疾病。探索乳腺癌患者新的预后和治疗靶点至关重要。本研究调查了乳腺癌患者中 MET、ESR1 和 ESR2 基因的表达及其与临床病理特征和临床预后的关系。研究方法乳腺癌 METABRIC 数据集来自 cBioPortal 公共领域。检索了 MET、ESR1 和 ESR2 的基因表达数据以及 MET 的假定拷贝数改变 (CNA)。结果MET mRNA的表达水平与ESR1的表达水平成反比,与ESR2的表达水平成正比(分别为r = -0.379和r = 0.066)。ESR1 mRNA 的表达在 MET CNAs 组间存在显著差异。与低 MET/ESR1 共表达患者相比,高 MET/ESR1 共表达患者的临床病理肿瘤特征和预后较好,如诊断时年龄较大、诺丁汉预后指数降低、肿瘤分级较低、激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性和管腔亚型等。相反,与低 MET/ESR2 共表达的患者相比,高 MET/ESR2 共表达的患者具有不利的肿瘤特征和高级预后指标。根据 MET/ESR 共表达状态,总生存率没有明显差异。然而,如果根据治疗类型(化疗和激素治疗)对数据进行分层,则生存率会因MET/ESR的共表达状态而有显著差异。结论。我们的研究结果为乳腺癌中MET和雌激素受体之间的潜在串扰提供了更多证据。MET/ESR基因的表达可能是一种新的预后指标,需要在未来的研究中评估MET抑制剂和内分泌药物联合治疗方法对乳腺癌的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of the Coexpression of MET and ESR Genes on Prognosticators and Clinical Outcomes of Breast Cancer: An Analysis for the METABRIC Dataset

Purpose. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Exploring new prognostic and therapeutic targets in patients with breast cancer is essential. This study investigated the expression of MET, ESR1, and ESR2 genes and their association with clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with breast cancer. Methods. The METABRIC dataset for breast cancer was obtained from the cBioPortal public domain. Gene expression data for MET, ESR1, and ESR2, as well as the putative copy number alterations (CNAs) for MET were retrieved. Results. The MET mRNA expression levels correlated inversely with the expression levels of ESR1 and positively with the expression levels of ESR2 (r = −0.379, p < 0.001 and r = 0.066, and p = 0.004, respectively). The ESR1 mRNA expression was significantly different among MET CNAs groups (p < 0.001). Patients with high MET/ESR1 coexpression had favorable clinicopathologic tumor characteristics and prognosticators compared to low MET/ESR1 coexpression in terms of greater age at diagnosis, reduced Nottingham Prognostic Index, lower tumor grade, hormone receptor positivity, HER2-negative status, and luminal subtype (p < 0.001). In contrast, patients with high MET/ESR2 coexpression had unfavorable tumor features and advanced prognosticators compared to patients with low MET/ESR2 coexpression (p < 0.001). No significant difference in overall survival was observed based on the MET/ESR coexpression status. However, when data were stratified based on the treatment type (chemotherapy and hormonal therapy), survival was significantly different based on the coexpression status of MET/ESR. Conclusions. Findings from our study add to the growing evidence on the potential crosstalk between MET and estrogen receptors in breast cancer. The expression of the MET/ESR genes could be a novel prognosticator and calls for future studies to evaluate the impact of combinational treatment approaches with MET inhibitors and endocrine drugs in breast cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Journal
Breast Journal 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Breast Journal is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary source devoted exclusively to all facets of research, diagnosis, and treatment of breast disease. The Breast Journal encompasses the latest news and technologies from the many medical specialties concerned with breast disease care in order to address the disease within the context of an integrated breast health care. This editorial philosophy recognizes the special social, sexual, and psychological considerations that distinguish cancer, and breast cancer in particular, from other serious diseases. Topics specifically within the scope of The Breast Journal include: Risk Factors Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis and Therapy Psychological Issues Quality of Life Biology of Breast Cancer.
期刊最新文献
Intramammary Tumor Location and Ipsilateral Lymphatic Spread in Early Breast Cancer Patients Using One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) Assay Relationship Between Mitochondrial Biological Function and Breast Cancer Unveiling miRNA30b’s Role in Suppressing ADAM12 to Combat Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Effect of Estrogen Receptor on the Relationship Between HER2 Immunohistochemistry Score and Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1