{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂对食管胃十二指肠镜检查中胃黏膜可见度和残留胃内容物的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly used in diabetes and obesity management. Although GLP-1RAs delay gastric emptying, their impact on visibility during EGD remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 1:1 matched case-control study was conducted. Individuals undergoing EGD who were taking GLP-1RAs were matched to nonusers based on demographic characteristics and diabetes status. A validated scale (POLPREP) was used to determine gastric mucosal visibility scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 84 pairs (N = 168) were included. GLP-1RA users had significantly lower visibility scores, with a 2.42 times higher likelihood of lower scores compared with nonusers. In addition, GLP-1RA users had a higher incidence of retained gastric contents (13.1% vs 4.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 4.62; <em>P</em> = .025) and aborted procedures due to this issue. No anesthesia-related adverse events were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>GLP-1RA use at the time of endoscopy exhibited higher odds of lower gastric mucosal visibility scores, retained contents, and aborted procedures. Further research is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"100 5","pages":"Pages 923-927"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on gastric mucosal visibility and retained gastric contents during EGD\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly used in diabetes and obesity management. Although GLP-1RAs delay gastric emptying, their impact on visibility during EGD remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 1:1 matched case-control study was conducted. Individuals undergoing EGD who were taking GLP-1RAs were matched to nonusers based on demographic characteristics and diabetes status. A validated scale (POLPREP) was used to determine gastric mucosal visibility scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 84 pairs (N = 168) were included. GLP-1RA users had significantly lower visibility scores, with a 2.42 times higher likelihood of lower scores compared with nonusers. In addition, GLP-1RA users had a higher incidence of retained gastric contents (13.1% vs 4.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 4.62; <em>P</em> = .025) and aborted procedures due to this issue. No anesthesia-related adverse events were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>GLP-1RA use at the time of endoscopy exhibited higher odds of lower gastric mucosal visibility scores, retained contents, and aborted procedures. Further research is warranted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"100 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 923-927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510724032085\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510724032085","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on gastric mucosal visibility and retained gastric contents during EGD
Background and Aims
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly used in diabetes and obesity management. Although GLP-1RAs delay gastric emptying, their impact on visibility during EGD remains uncertain.
Methods
A 1:1 matched case-control study was conducted. Individuals undergoing EGD who were taking GLP-1RAs were matched to nonusers based on demographic characteristics and diabetes status. A validated scale (POLPREP) was used to determine gastric mucosal visibility scores.
Results
A total of 84 pairs (N = 168) were included. GLP-1RA users had significantly lower visibility scores, with a 2.42 times higher likelihood of lower scores compared with nonusers. In addition, GLP-1RA users had a higher incidence of retained gastric contents (13.1% vs 4.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 4.62; P = .025) and aborted procedures due to this issue. No anesthesia-related adverse events were observed.
Conclusions
GLP-1RA use at the time of endoscopy exhibited higher odds of lower gastric mucosal visibility scores, retained contents, and aborted procedures. Further research is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.