儿童的 5 种爱的语言》(查普曼;坎贝尔,2017 年):其两大原则对于定性研究和教师培训是否具有学术有效性?

Lilian Bohn, Clóvis Trezzi, Vera Lucia Felicetti
{"title":"儿童的 5 种爱的语言》(查普曼;坎贝尔,2017 年):其两大原则对于定性研究和教师培训是否具有学术有效性?","authors":"Lilian Bohn, Clóvis Trezzi, Vera Lucia Felicetti","doi":"10.51359/2525-7668.2024.262001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a qualitative analysis of seven quantitative academic studies on two main concepts from Gary Chapman's five love languages theory, the foundation of “The 5 love languages of children”. These studies were selected from a literature review conducted in 2021 through the State of Knowledge methodology. The texts were analyzed using the Discursive Textual Analysis technique. This article aims to show what has been studied on Chapman’s theory outside Brazil. Three of the studies confirmed the empirical validity of each of the five love languages as proposed in Chapman’s thesis. Additionally, two academic works empirically validated the primary love language hypothesis. Findings indicate both of Chapman’s claims as empirically valid concepts through quantitative research. Results suggest that these principles in the realm of childhood could be meaningful to qualitative research – on education and teacher training – to improve both teaching and learning processes.","PeriodicalId":507369,"journal":{"name":"Interritórios","volume":"3 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 5 love languages of children (Chapman; Campbell, 2017): are its two main principles academically valid for qualitative research and teacher training?\",\"authors\":\"Lilian Bohn, Clóvis Trezzi, Vera Lucia Felicetti\",\"doi\":\"10.51359/2525-7668.2024.262001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a qualitative analysis of seven quantitative academic studies on two main concepts from Gary Chapman's five love languages theory, the foundation of “The 5 love languages of children”. These studies were selected from a literature review conducted in 2021 through the State of Knowledge methodology. The texts were analyzed using the Discursive Textual Analysis technique. This article aims to show what has been studied on Chapman’s theory outside Brazil. Three of the studies confirmed the empirical validity of each of the five love languages as proposed in Chapman’s thesis. Additionally, two academic works empirically validated the primary love language hypothesis. Findings indicate both of Chapman’s claims as empirically valid concepts through quantitative research. Results suggest that these principles in the realm of childhood could be meaningful to qualitative research – on education and teacher training – to improve both teaching and learning processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interritórios\",\"volume\":\"3 45\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interritórios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51359/2525-7668.2024.262001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interritórios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51359/2525-7668.2024.262001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文对加里-查普曼(Gary Chapman)的五种爱的语言理论("儿童的五种爱的语言 "的基础)中的两个主要概念的七项定量学术研究进行了定性分析。这些研究是从 2021 年通过 "知识状态 "方法进行的文献综述中挑选出来的。文章采用辨证文本分析技术对这些文本进行了分析。本文旨在介绍巴西以外对查普曼理论的研究情况。其中三项研究证实了查普曼论文中提出的五种爱情语言的实证有效性。此外,两部学术著作从经验上验证了主要爱情语言假设。研究结果表明,通过定量研究,查普曼的这两种说法都是经验上有效的概念。研究结果表明,童年领域的这些原则对定性研究--教育和教师培训--都很有意义,可以改善教学和学习过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The 5 love languages of children (Chapman; Campbell, 2017): are its two main principles academically valid for qualitative research and teacher training?
This paper presents a qualitative analysis of seven quantitative academic studies on two main concepts from Gary Chapman's five love languages theory, the foundation of “The 5 love languages of children”. These studies were selected from a literature review conducted in 2021 through the State of Knowledge methodology. The texts were analyzed using the Discursive Textual Analysis technique. This article aims to show what has been studied on Chapman’s theory outside Brazil. Three of the studies confirmed the empirical validity of each of the five love languages as proposed in Chapman’s thesis. Additionally, two academic works empirically validated the primary love language hypothesis. Findings indicate both of Chapman’s claims as empirically valid concepts through quantitative research. Results suggest that these principles in the realm of childhood could be meaningful to qualitative research – on education and teacher training – to improve both teaching and learning processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Formação continuada de professores no contexto dos planos decenais (2014-2025) pela análise da produção acadêmico-científica Gestão democrática: a construção de uma escola inclusiva Mulher, educação e participação política: o caso pernambucano (1947-2022) Experiências socioeconômicas de mulheres em áreas de conservação ambiental: percepções e perspectivas de desenvolvimento, educação e empoderamento A atuação dos aparelhos privados de hegemonia na formação continuada dos professores da Educação Básica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1