聚合物电解质燃料电池热电联产系统、锂离子电池和光伏发电混合系统组合和运行的环境影响评估,考虑性能退化问题

IF 5.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Engineering and Technology Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1016/j.clet.2024.100756
Kenta Mandai, Shan Miao, Kiyoshi Dowaki
{"title":"聚合物电解质燃料电池热电联产系统、锂离子电池和光伏发电混合系统组合和运行的环境影响评估,考虑性能退化问题","authors":"Kenta Mandai,&nbsp;Shan Miao,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Dowaki","doi":"10.1016/j.clet.2024.100756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, fuel cell co-generation systems (FC-CGS) have attracted attention for contributing to the environment and are becoming increasingly popular. Considering the current situation, technical specifications for general FC-CGS environmental impact assessments have been published by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Technical Committee 105 Working Group 14 (TC105WG14). Additionally, several combinations of renewable energy systems, energy storage, and energy-saving technologies have been proposed to obtain more environmental benefits. In this study, several scenarios for combining a polymer electrolyte fuel cell co-generation system (PEFC-CGS) with a battery and PV were created, system operation was discussed, and an environmental impact assessment was conducted. The evaluation was based on IEC standards, considering performance degradation during the usage phase. As a result, it was found that a system in which PEFC-CGS operated in load-following mode, combined with battery and PV, could reduce global warming potential (GWP) by about 36%. There was almost no difference in the PEFC-CGS degradation rate owing to the difference in the operating methods. However, the battery degradation rate showed approximately a 45% difference depending on the scenario. In addition, an environmental gain of <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mi>e</mi><mi>c</mi><mi>o</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>g</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> was proposed that expresses the reduction rate from the BAU scenario. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by changing the weather conditions. The results showed that even when solar radiation was varied, eco-gain was much better than when PV was not installed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34618,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000363/pdfft?md5=4ffe3115bb1d092d4334f30b8e4658d6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666790824000363-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental impact assessment on polymer electrolyte fuel cell co-generation system, lithium-ion battery, and photovoltaic hybrid system combination and operation, considering performance degradation\",\"authors\":\"Kenta Mandai,&nbsp;Shan Miao,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Dowaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clet.2024.100756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In recent years, fuel cell co-generation systems (FC-CGS) have attracted attention for contributing to the environment and are becoming increasingly popular. Considering the current situation, technical specifications for general FC-CGS environmental impact assessments have been published by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Technical Committee 105 Working Group 14 (TC105WG14). Additionally, several combinations of renewable energy systems, energy storage, and energy-saving technologies have been proposed to obtain more environmental benefits. In this study, several scenarios for combining a polymer electrolyte fuel cell co-generation system (PEFC-CGS) with a battery and PV were created, system operation was discussed, and an environmental impact assessment was conducted. The evaluation was based on IEC standards, considering performance degradation during the usage phase. As a result, it was found that a system in which PEFC-CGS operated in load-following mode, combined with battery and PV, could reduce global warming potential (GWP) by about 36%. There was almost no difference in the PEFC-CGS degradation rate owing to the difference in the operating methods. However, the battery degradation rate showed approximately a 45% difference depending on the scenario. In addition, an environmental gain of <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mi>e</mi><mi>c</mi><mi>o</mi><mo>−</mo><mi>g</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> was proposed that expresses the reduction rate from the BAU scenario. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by changing the weather conditions. The results showed that even when solar radiation was varied, eco-gain was much better than when PV was not installed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000363/pdfft?md5=4ffe3115bb1d092d4334f30b8e4658d6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666790824000363-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,燃料电池热电联产系统(FC-CGS)因其对环境的贡献而备受关注,并越来越受欢迎。考虑到当前形势,国际电工委员会(IEC)第 105 技术委员会第 14 工作组(TC105WG14)发布了一般 FC-CGS 环境影响评估技术规范。此外,还提出了几种可再生能源系统、储能和节能技术的组合,以获得更多的环境效益。在本研究中,提出了几种将聚合物电解质燃料电池联合发电系统(PEFC-CGS)与电池和光伏相结合的方案,讨论了系统运行问题,并进行了环境影响评估。评估以 IEC 标准为基础,考虑了使用阶段的性能衰减。结果发现,PEFC-CGS 以负载跟随模式运行的系统与电池和光伏相结合,可将全球升温潜能值(GWP)降低约 36%。由于运行方式不同,PEFC-CGS 的降解率几乎没有差异。然而,电池降解率则因方案不同而有约 45% 的差异。此外,还提出了一个环境增益 ηeco-gain,表示与 BAU 情景相比的降解率。最后,通过改变天气条件进行了敏感性分析。结果表明,即使太阳辐射不同,生态增益也比不安装光伏发电设备时要好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Environmental impact assessment on polymer electrolyte fuel cell co-generation system, lithium-ion battery, and photovoltaic hybrid system combination and operation, considering performance degradation

In recent years, fuel cell co-generation systems (FC-CGS) have attracted attention for contributing to the environment and are becoming increasingly popular. Considering the current situation, technical specifications for general FC-CGS environmental impact assessments have been published by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Technical Committee 105 Working Group 14 (TC105WG14). Additionally, several combinations of renewable energy systems, energy storage, and energy-saving technologies have been proposed to obtain more environmental benefits. In this study, several scenarios for combining a polymer electrolyte fuel cell co-generation system (PEFC-CGS) with a battery and PV were created, system operation was discussed, and an environmental impact assessment was conducted. The evaluation was based on IEC standards, considering performance degradation during the usage phase. As a result, it was found that a system in which PEFC-CGS operated in load-following mode, combined with battery and PV, could reduce global warming potential (GWP) by about 36%. There was almost no difference in the PEFC-CGS degradation rate owing to the difference in the operating methods. However, the battery degradation rate showed approximately a 45% difference depending on the scenario. In addition, an environmental gain of ηecogain was proposed that expresses the reduction rate from the BAU scenario. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by changing the weather conditions. The results showed that even when solar radiation was varied, eco-gain was much better than when PV was not installed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Cleaner Engineering and Technology Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Graph theory-enhanced integrated distribution network reconfiguration and distributed generation planning: A comparative techno-economic and environmental impacts analysis Assessing the durability of diverse leather tanning techniques for the manufacturing of leather goods through artificial aging processes Microfibres and coliforms determination and removal from wastewater treatment effluent Cloud point extraction of phenolics from sugarcane juice improves its usability as a carbon source in bioprocessing of lipids from Rhodosporidium kratochvilovae MTCC247 Assessment of CO2 capture and storage onboard LNG vessels driven by energy recovery from engine exhaust
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1