{"title":"入侵树种对温带森林中橡树和松树的地上生物量增长没有影响","authors":"Sebastian Bury, Marcin K. Dyderski","doi":"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Prunus serotina</em> and <em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em> are the most widespread invasive trees in Central Europe. In addition, according to climate models, decreased growth of many economically and ecologically important native trees will likely be observed in the future. We aimed to assess the impact of these two neophytes, which differ in the biomass range and nitrogen-fixing abilities observed in Central European conditions, on the relative aboveground biomass increments of native oaks <em>Quercus robur</em> and <em>Q. petraea</em> and Scots pine <em>Pinus sylvestris</em>. We aimed to increase our understanding of the relationship between facilitation and competition between woody alien species and overstory native trees. We established 72 circular plots (0.05 ha) in two different forest habitat types and stands varying in age in western Poland. We chose plots with different abundances of the studied neophytes to determine how effects scaled along the quantitative invasion gradient. Furthermore, we collected growth cores of the studied native species, and we calculated aboveground biomass increments at the tree and stand levels. Then, we used generalized linear mixed-effects models to assess the impact of invasive species abundances on relative aboveground biomass increments of native tree species. We did not find a biologically or statistically significant impact of invasive <em>R. pseudoacacia</em> or <em>P. serotina</em> on the relative aboveground biomass increments of native oaks and pines along the quantitative gradient of invader biomass or on the proportion of total stand biomass accounted for by invaders. The neophytes did not act as native tree growth stimulators but also did not compete with them for resources, which would escalate the negative impact of climate change on pines and oaks. The neophytes should not significantly modify the carbon sequestration capacity of the native species. Our work combines elements of the <em>per capita</em> effect of invasion with research on mixed forest management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54270,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecosystems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S219756202400037X/pdfft?md5=08e196de16b467b2050c028fe80bfeb0&pid=1-s2.0-S219756202400037X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No effect of invasive tree species on aboveground biomass increments of oaks and pines in temperate forests\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Bury, Marcin K. Dyderski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Prunus serotina</em> and <em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em> are the most widespread invasive trees in Central Europe. In addition, according to climate models, decreased growth of many economically and ecologically important native trees will likely be observed in the future. We aimed to assess the impact of these two neophytes, which differ in the biomass range and nitrogen-fixing abilities observed in Central European conditions, on the relative aboveground biomass increments of native oaks <em>Quercus robur</em> and <em>Q. petraea</em> and Scots pine <em>Pinus sylvestris</em>. We aimed to increase our understanding of the relationship between facilitation and competition between woody alien species and overstory native trees. We established 72 circular plots (0.05 ha) in two different forest habitat types and stands varying in age in western Poland. We chose plots with different abundances of the studied neophytes to determine how effects scaled along the quantitative invasion gradient. Furthermore, we collected growth cores of the studied native species, and we calculated aboveground biomass increments at the tree and stand levels. Then, we used generalized linear mixed-effects models to assess the impact of invasive species abundances on relative aboveground biomass increments of native tree species. We did not find a biologically or statistically significant impact of invasive <em>R. pseudoacacia</em> or <em>P. serotina</em> on the relative aboveground biomass increments of native oaks and pines along the quantitative gradient of invader biomass or on the proportion of total stand biomass accounted for by invaders. The neophytes did not act as native tree growth stimulators but also did not compete with them for resources, which would escalate the negative impact of climate change on pines and oaks. The neophytes should not significantly modify the carbon sequestration capacity of the native species. Our work combines elements of the <em>per capita</em> effect of invasion with research on mixed forest management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecosystems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S219756202400037X/pdfft?md5=08e196de16b467b2050c028fe80bfeb0&pid=1-s2.0-S219756202400037X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S219756202400037X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S219756202400037X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
樱桃树和刺槐是中欧最普遍的入侵树木。此外,根据气候模型,许多在经济和生态方面具有重要意义的本地树木在未来可能会生长减缓。我们的目的是评估这两种在中欧条件下观察到的生物量范围和固氮能力不同的新物种对本地橡树(Quercus robur和Q. petraea)和苏格兰松树(Pinus sylvestris)相对地上生物量增量的影响。我们的目的是进一步了解木本外来物种与上层本地树木之间的促进和竞争关系。我们在波兰西部两种不同的森林栖息地类型和不同树龄的林分中建立了 72 个圆形小区(0.05 公顷)。我们选择了所研究的新生物丰度不同的地块,以确定影响如何沿着数量入侵梯度扩展。此外,我们还收集了所研究的本地物种的生长核心,并计算了树木和林分层面的地上生物量增量。然后,我们使用广义线性混合效应模型来评估入侵物种丰度对本地树种相对地上生物量增量的影响。我们没有发现入侵的 R. pseudoacacia 或 P. serotina 对沿入侵者生物量定量梯度的本地橡树和松树的相对地上生物量增量或入侵者占林木总生物量的比例有生物学或统计学上的显著影响。新生物不会刺激本地树木的生长,但也不会与本地树木争夺资源,这将加剧气候变化对松树和橡树的负面影响。新生物不会明显改变本地树种的固碳能力。我们的研究将入侵的人均效应与混交林管理研究相结合。
No effect of invasive tree species on aboveground biomass increments of oaks and pines in temperate forests
Prunus serotina and Robinia pseudoacacia are the most widespread invasive trees in Central Europe. In addition, according to climate models, decreased growth of many economically and ecologically important native trees will likely be observed in the future. We aimed to assess the impact of these two neophytes, which differ in the biomass range and nitrogen-fixing abilities observed in Central European conditions, on the relative aboveground biomass increments of native oaks Quercus robur and Q. petraea and Scots pine Pinus sylvestris. We aimed to increase our understanding of the relationship between facilitation and competition between woody alien species and overstory native trees. We established 72 circular plots (0.05 ha) in two different forest habitat types and stands varying in age in western Poland. We chose plots with different abundances of the studied neophytes to determine how effects scaled along the quantitative invasion gradient. Furthermore, we collected growth cores of the studied native species, and we calculated aboveground biomass increments at the tree and stand levels. Then, we used generalized linear mixed-effects models to assess the impact of invasive species abundances on relative aboveground biomass increments of native tree species. We did not find a biologically or statistically significant impact of invasive R. pseudoacacia or P. serotina on the relative aboveground biomass increments of native oaks and pines along the quantitative gradient of invader biomass or on the proportion of total stand biomass accounted for by invaders. The neophytes did not act as native tree growth stimulators but also did not compete with them for resources, which would escalate the negative impact of climate change on pines and oaks. The neophytes should not significantly modify the carbon sequestration capacity of the native species. Our work combines elements of the per capita effect of invasion with research on mixed forest management.
Forest EcosystemsEnvironmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1115
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecosystems is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing scientific communications from any discipline that can provide interesting contributions about the structure and dynamics of "natural" and "domesticated" forest ecosystems, and their services to people. The journal welcomes innovative science as well as application oriented work that will enhance understanding of woody plant communities. Very specific studies are welcome if they are part of a thematic series that provides some holistic perspective that is of general interest.