不可逆压实对枯竭储层二氧化碳封存影响的耦合地质力学分析

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104158
Ying Xin , Hwajung Yoo , Ki-Bok Min , Jonny Rutqvist
{"title":"不可逆压实对枯竭储层二氧化碳封存影响的耦合地质力学分析","authors":"Ying Xin ,&nbsp;Hwajung Yoo ,&nbsp;Ki-Bok Min ,&nbsp;Jonny Rutqvist","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The utilization of depleted gas reservoirs for carbon storage offers substantial advantages. However, it raises concerns related to the geomechanical effects of historic gas extraction on the CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration operation. In this study, a coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical investigation is conducted on a multi-layered sedimentary system that includes sealed bounding faults. Our simulations exhibit various levels of reservoir compaction during gas extraction under different pre-consolidation conditions of the sediments, highlighting the pivotal role of reservoir compaction in geomechanical analysis. The results demonstrate the occurrence of strain-hardening compaction behavior in the reservoir during post-yield depletion. This compaction is accompanied by a significant reduction in porosity and permeability, as well as irreversible surface subsidence. Hysteresis in the stress state is induced by the aforementioned irreversible reservoir compaction through two primary mechanisms: poro-elastoplastic stressing and differential compaction on each side of the sealing fault. These mechanisms alter the magnitude and orientation of stress inside and outside the depleted reservoir. Moreover, caprock compaction is impeded and delayed by the irreversible reservoir compaction owing to poro-elastoplastic stressing. This implies that conventional methods relying on the poro-elasticity theory alone may overestimate pressure required to fracture the caprock by approximately 2 MPa. When considering the combined effect of poro-elastoplastic stressing and differential compaction, neglecting irreversible reservoir compaction may lead to underestimation of the critical pressure for inducing fault slip by up to 4.9 MPa. Additionally, regardless of whether plastic void compaction is considered, we recommend increased attention be focused on the sub-vertical faults to mitigate the risk of significant slip that potentially could also lead to upward CO<sub>2</sub> leakage. In scenarios where a slip event occurs in a fault during reservoir depletion, the results show that a subsequent CO<sub>2</sub> injection operation tends to stabilize the faults. Nevertheless, it is crucial to consider that fault stability could deteriorate rapidly over time, potentially leading to a second slip event during carbon sequestration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 104158"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coupled geomechanical analysis of irreversible compaction impact on CO2 storage in a depleted reservoir\",\"authors\":\"Ying Xin ,&nbsp;Hwajung Yoo ,&nbsp;Ki-Bok Min ,&nbsp;Jonny Rutqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The utilization of depleted gas reservoirs for carbon storage offers substantial advantages. However, it raises concerns related to the geomechanical effects of historic gas extraction on the CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration operation. In this study, a coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical investigation is conducted on a multi-layered sedimentary system that includes sealed bounding faults. Our simulations exhibit various levels of reservoir compaction during gas extraction under different pre-consolidation conditions of the sediments, highlighting the pivotal role of reservoir compaction in geomechanical analysis. The results demonstrate the occurrence of strain-hardening compaction behavior in the reservoir during post-yield depletion. This compaction is accompanied by a significant reduction in porosity and permeability, as well as irreversible surface subsidence. Hysteresis in the stress state is induced by the aforementioned irreversible reservoir compaction through two primary mechanisms: poro-elastoplastic stressing and differential compaction on each side of the sealing fault. These mechanisms alter the magnitude and orientation of stress inside and outside the depleted reservoir. Moreover, caprock compaction is impeded and delayed by the irreversible reservoir compaction owing to poro-elastoplastic stressing. This implies that conventional methods relying on the poro-elasticity theory alone may overestimate pressure required to fracture the caprock by approximately 2 MPa. When considering the combined effect of poro-elastoplastic stressing and differential compaction, neglecting irreversible reservoir compaction may lead to underestimation of the critical pressure for inducing fault slip by up to 4.9 MPa. Additionally, regardless of whether plastic void compaction is considered, we recommend increased attention be focused on the sub-vertical faults to mitigate the risk of significant slip that potentially could also lead to upward CO<sub>2</sub> leakage. In scenarios where a slip event occurs in a fault during reservoir depletion, the results show that a subsequent CO<sub>2</sub> injection operation tends to stabilize the faults. Nevertheless, it is crucial to consider that fault stability could deteriorate rapidly over time, potentially leading to a second slip event during carbon sequestration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用枯竭气藏进行碳封存具有巨大优势。然而,这也引发了人们对历史上天然气开采对二氧化碳封存操作的地质力学影响的担忧。在本研究中,我们对一个包含密封边界断层的多层沉积系统进行了热-水-力学耦合研究。我们的模拟结果表明,在不同的沉积物预固结条件下,天然气开采过程中会出现不同程度的储层压实,这凸显了储层压实在地质力学分析中的关键作用。结果表明,在后产状耗竭过程中,储层出现了应变硬化压实行为。这种压实伴随着孔隙度和渗透率的显著降低,以及不可逆的地表下沉。上述不可逆的储层压实通过两种主要机制诱发应力状态的滞后:孔隙弹性应力和封隔断层两侧的差异压实。这些机制改变了枯竭储层内外应力的大小和方向。此外,由于孔隙-弹塑性应力作用造成的不可逆储层压实,毛岩压实受到阻碍和延迟。这意味着,仅仅依靠孔隙弹性理论的传统方法可能会将压裂盖层所需的压力高估约 2 兆帕。在考虑孔隙弹性应力和差异压实的综合效应时,如果忽略不可逆的储层压实,可能会导致诱发断层滑动的临界压力被低估达 4.9 兆帕。此外,无论是否考虑塑性空隙压实,我们都建议加强对次垂直断层的关注,以减少可能导致二氧化碳向上泄漏的重大滑动风险。在储层枯竭期间断层发生滑动的情况下,结果表明随后的二氧化碳注入作业往往会使断层趋于稳定。尽管如此,必须考虑到断层稳定性可能会随着时间的推移而迅速恶化,从而可能导致碳封存过程中的第二次滑动事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coupled geomechanical analysis of irreversible compaction impact on CO2 storage in a depleted reservoir

The utilization of depleted gas reservoirs for carbon storage offers substantial advantages. However, it raises concerns related to the geomechanical effects of historic gas extraction on the CO2 sequestration operation. In this study, a coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical investigation is conducted on a multi-layered sedimentary system that includes sealed bounding faults. Our simulations exhibit various levels of reservoir compaction during gas extraction under different pre-consolidation conditions of the sediments, highlighting the pivotal role of reservoir compaction in geomechanical analysis. The results demonstrate the occurrence of strain-hardening compaction behavior in the reservoir during post-yield depletion. This compaction is accompanied by a significant reduction in porosity and permeability, as well as irreversible surface subsidence. Hysteresis in the stress state is induced by the aforementioned irreversible reservoir compaction through two primary mechanisms: poro-elastoplastic stressing and differential compaction on each side of the sealing fault. These mechanisms alter the magnitude and orientation of stress inside and outside the depleted reservoir. Moreover, caprock compaction is impeded and delayed by the irreversible reservoir compaction owing to poro-elastoplastic stressing. This implies that conventional methods relying on the poro-elasticity theory alone may overestimate pressure required to fracture the caprock by approximately 2 MPa. When considering the combined effect of poro-elastoplastic stressing and differential compaction, neglecting irreversible reservoir compaction may lead to underestimation of the critical pressure for inducing fault slip by up to 4.9 MPa. Additionally, regardless of whether plastic void compaction is considered, we recommend increased attention be focused on the sub-vertical faults to mitigate the risk of significant slip that potentially could also lead to upward CO2 leakage. In scenarios where a slip event occurs in a fault during reservoir depletion, the results show that a subsequent CO2 injection operation tends to stabilize the faults. Nevertheless, it is crucial to consider that fault stability could deteriorate rapidly over time, potentially leading to a second slip event during carbon sequestration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
期刊最新文献
Putting the genie back in the bottle: Decarbonizing petroleum with direct air capture and enhanced oil recovery A conceptual evaluation of the use of Ca(OH)2 for attaining carbon capture rates of 99% in the calcium looping process Determining the dominant factors controlling mineralization in three-dimensional fracture networks Conceptual design and evaluation of membrane gas separation-based CO2 recovery unit for CO2 electrolyzers employing anion exchange membranes Enhanced cation release via acid pretreatment for gigaton-scale geologic CO2 sequestration in basalt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1