在开放和受限的设计任务中,研究物理原型和数字原型的大脑活动差异

H. Dybvik, Adam McClenaghan, Mariya Stefanova Stoyanova Bond, Asbjørn Svergja, Tripp Shealy, Chris Snider, P. Aalto, Martin Steinert, M. Goudswaard
{"title":"在开放和受限的设计任务中,研究物理原型和数字原型的大脑活动差异","authors":"H. Dybvik, Adam McClenaghan, Mariya Stefanova Stoyanova Bond, Asbjørn Svergja, Tripp Shealy, Chris Snider, P. Aalto, Martin Steinert, M. Goudswaard","doi":"10.1017/pds.2024.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an fNIRS experiment investigating cognitive differences between physical and digital prototyping methods in designers (N=25) engaged in open and constrained design tasks. Initial results suggest that physical prototyping yields increased hemodynamic response (i.e., brain activity) compared to digital design, and that constrained design yields increased hemodynamic response compared to open design, in the prefrontal cortex. Further work will seek to triangulate results by investigating potential correlations to design processes and design outputs.","PeriodicalId":489438,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating differences in brain activity between physical and digital prototyping in open and constrained design tasks\",\"authors\":\"H. Dybvik, Adam McClenaghan, Mariya Stefanova Stoyanova Bond, Asbjørn Svergja, Tripp Shealy, Chris Snider, P. Aalto, Martin Steinert, M. Goudswaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/pds.2024.97\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents an fNIRS experiment investigating cognitive differences between physical and digital prototyping methods in designers (N=25) engaged in open and constrained design tasks. Initial results suggest that physical prototyping yields increased hemodynamic response (i.e., brain activity) compared to digital design, and that constrained design yields increased hemodynamic response compared to open design, in the prefrontal cortex. Further work will seek to triangulate results by investigating potential correlations to design processes and design outputs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Design Society\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Design Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.97\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Design Society","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一项 fNIRS 实验,研究物理原型设计和数字原型设计方法在参与开放式和受限式设计任务的设计师(25 人)中的认知差异。初步结果表明,与数字设计相比,物理原型设计会增加前额叶皮层的血液动力学反应(即大脑活动);与开放设计相比,受限设计会增加前额叶皮层的血液动力学反应。下一步工作将通过研究与设计过程和设计产出之间的潜在关联,寻求对结果进行三角测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating differences in brain activity between physical and digital prototyping in open and constrained design tasks
This article presents an fNIRS experiment investigating cognitive differences between physical and digital prototyping methods in designers (N=25) engaged in open and constrained design tasks. Initial results suggest that physical prototyping yields increased hemodynamic response (i.e., brain activity) compared to digital design, and that constrained design yields increased hemodynamic response compared to open design, in the prefrontal cortex. Further work will seek to triangulate results by investigating potential correlations to design processes and design outputs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing lab-on-a-chip systems with attribute dependency graphs Implementing an open innovation process in the premium marine industry Variability in complex product/system design: case study in automotive industry Computing solution spaces for gear box design Machine learning-based virtual sensors for reduced energy consumption in frost-free refrigerators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1