H. Dybvik, Adam McClenaghan, Mariya Stefanova Stoyanova Bond, Asbjørn Svergja, Tripp Shealy, Chris Snider, P. Aalto, Martin Steinert, M. Goudswaard
{"title":"在开放和受限的设计任务中,研究物理原型和数字原型的大脑活动差异","authors":"H. Dybvik, Adam McClenaghan, Mariya Stefanova Stoyanova Bond, Asbjørn Svergja, Tripp Shealy, Chris Snider, P. Aalto, Martin Steinert, M. Goudswaard","doi":"10.1017/pds.2024.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an fNIRS experiment investigating cognitive differences between physical and digital prototyping methods in designers (N=25) engaged in open and constrained design tasks. Initial results suggest that physical prototyping yields increased hemodynamic response (i.e., brain activity) compared to digital design, and that constrained design yields increased hemodynamic response compared to open design, in the prefrontal cortex. Further work will seek to triangulate results by investigating potential correlations to design processes and design outputs.","PeriodicalId":489438,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Design Society","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating differences in brain activity between physical and digital prototyping in open and constrained design tasks\",\"authors\":\"H. Dybvik, Adam McClenaghan, Mariya Stefanova Stoyanova Bond, Asbjørn Svergja, Tripp Shealy, Chris Snider, P. Aalto, Martin Steinert, M. Goudswaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/pds.2024.97\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents an fNIRS experiment investigating cognitive differences between physical and digital prototyping methods in designers (N=25) engaged in open and constrained design tasks. Initial results suggest that physical prototyping yields increased hemodynamic response (i.e., brain activity) compared to digital design, and that constrained design yields increased hemodynamic response compared to open design, in the prefrontal cortex. Further work will seek to triangulate results by investigating potential correlations to design processes and design outputs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Design Society\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Design Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.97\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Design Society","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2024.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating differences in brain activity between physical and digital prototyping in open and constrained design tasks
This article presents an fNIRS experiment investigating cognitive differences between physical and digital prototyping methods in designers (N=25) engaged in open and constrained design tasks. Initial results suggest that physical prototyping yields increased hemodynamic response (i.e., brain activity) compared to digital design, and that constrained design yields increased hemodynamic response compared to open design, in the prefrontal cortex. Further work will seek to triangulate results by investigating potential correlations to design processes and design outputs.