通过限制压缩区实现 GFRP RC 梁延展性的实验研究

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Advances in Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1155/2024/4268615
Erfan Tahrirchi, Farshid J. Alaee, Meysam Jalali
{"title":"通过限制压缩区实现 GFRP RC 梁延展性的实验研究","authors":"Erfan Tahrirchi, Farshid J. Alaee, Meysam Jalali","doi":"10.1155/2024/4268615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, building structures in corrosive environments requires some considerations. Being lightweight, high tensile strength, and corrosion resistance are the features that make fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) bars an alternative component for longitudinal steel reinforcement of concrete. On the other hand, the linear elastic behavior of FRP bars, alongside the brittle behavior of concrete, makes brittle members without considerable ductility. In this paper, the effect of compression region confinement with CFRP sheets on the FRP-reinforced concrete beams was experimentally investigated. Eight GFRP reinforced beams with 2 m length, including one reference beam and seven confined beams, were constructed and tested under a four-point bending test. Based on the type of confinement, specimens are categorized into four groups. Flexural behavior improvements, including load carry capacity, energy dissipation capacity, and ductility, were observed in at least one specimen of each confined group. According to the results, the specimen that was spirally confined with a 30 mm ribbon width and angle of 10° had the best total energy absorption up to about 110% improvement in comparison to the unconfined specimen. On the other hand, vertically confined specimens with 50 mm ribbon width showed the highest improvement in ductility indices and load carrying capacity up to 60% and 11% in comparison to unconfined specimens, respectively. Due to concrete compression zone fractures in flexural failure mode, the over-reinforce method is considered the design philosophy. Results indicate that regardless of the confinement type (discrete vertical, discrete spiral, or continuous spiral confinement), there is an optimal amount for width, blank space between ribbons, and depth of confinement to achieve the best flexural behavior.","PeriodicalId":7242,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Investigation of Ductility in GFRP RC Beams by Confining the Compression Zone\",\"authors\":\"Erfan Tahrirchi, Farshid J. Alaee, Meysam Jalali\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/4268615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays, building structures in corrosive environments requires some considerations. Being lightweight, high tensile strength, and corrosion resistance are the features that make fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) bars an alternative component for longitudinal steel reinforcement of concrete. On the other hand, the linear elastic behavior of FRP bars, alongside the brittle behavior of concrete, makes brittle members without considerable ductility. In this paper, the effect of compression region confinement with CFRP sheets on the FRP-reinforced concrete beams was experimentally investigated. Eight GFRP reinforced beams with 2 m length, including one reference beam and seven confined beams, were constructed and tested under a four-point bending test. Based on the type of confinement, specimens are categorized into four groups. Flexural behavior improvements, including load carry capacity, energy dissipation capacity, and ductility, were observed in at least one specimen of each confined group. According to the results, the specimen that was spirally confined with a 30 mm ribbon width and angle of 10° had the best total energy absorption up to about 110% improvement in comparison to the unconfined specimen. On the other hand, vertically confined specimens with 50 mm ribbon width showed the highest improvement in ductility indices and load carrying capacity up to 60% and 11% in comparison to unconfined specimens, respectively. Due to concrete compression zone fractures in flexural failure mode, the over-reinforce method is considered the design philosophy. Results indicate that regardless of the confinement type (discrete vertical, discrete spiral, or continuous spiral confinement), there is an optimal amount for width, blank space between ribbons, and depth of confinement to achieve the best flexural behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4268615\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4268615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,在腐蚀性环境中建造结构需要考虑一些因素。纤维增强塑料(FRP)钢筋重量轻、抗拉强度高、耐腐蚀,这些特点使其成为混凝土纵向钢筋的替代材料。另一方面,玻璃纤维增强塑料条的线弹性行为与混凝土的脆性行为相结合,使得脆性构件没有相当的延展性。本文通过实验研究了 CFRP 片材受压区域约束对 FRP 加固混凝土梁的影响。研究人员建造了八根长度为 2 米的 GFRP 加固梁,其中包括一根基准梁和七根约束梁,并对其进行了四点弯曲试验。根据约束类型,试样被分为四组。每个约束组中至少有一个试样的挠曲性能有所改善,包括承载能力、能量耗散能力和延展性。结果表明,与无约束试样相比,螺旋约束试样(带宽 30 毫米,夹角 10°)的总能量吸收能力最好,提高了约 110%。另一方面,带宽为 50 毫米的垂直约束试样与非约束试样相比,延性指数和承载能力的改善幅度最大,分别达到 60% 和 11%。由于混凝土受压区在挠曲破坏模式下会出现断裂,因此采用了超筋法作为设计理念。结果表明,无论采用哪种限制类型(离散垂直限制、离散螺旋限制或连续螺旋限制),都有一个最佳的限制宽度、限制带之间的空白空间和限制深度,以实现最佳的抗弯行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental Investigation of Ductility in GFRP RC Beams by Confining the Compression Zone
Nowadays, building structures in corrosive environments requires some considerations. Being lightweight, high tensile strength, and corrosion resistance are the features that make fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) bars an alternative component for longitudinal steel reinforcement of concrete. On the other hand, the linear elastic behavior of FRP bars, alongside the brittle behavior of concrete, makes brittle members without considerable ductility. In this paper, the effect of compression region confinement with CFRP sheets on the FRP-reinforced concrete beams was experimentally investigated. Eight GFRP reinforced beams with 2 m length, including one reference beam and seven confined beams, were constructed and tested under a four-point bending test. Based on the type of confinement, specimens are categorized into four groups. Flexural behavior improvements, including load carry capacity, energy dissipation capacity, and ductility, were observed in at least one specimen of each confined group. According to the results, the specimen that was spirally confined with a 30 mm ribbon width and angle of 10° had the best total energy absorption up to about 110% improvement in comparison to the unconfined specimen. On the other hand, vertically confined specimens with 50 mm ribbon width showed the highest improvement in ductility indices and load carrying capacity up to 60% and 11% in comparison to unconfined specimens, respectively. Due to concrete compression zone fractures in flexural failure mode, the over-reinforce method is considered the design philosophy. Results indicate that regardless of the confinement type (discrete vertical, discrete spiral, or continuous spiral confinement), there is an optimal amount for width, blank space between ribbons, and depth of confinement to achieve the best flexural behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Civil Engineering
Advances in Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
612
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Civil Engineering publishes papers in all areas of civil engineering. The journal welcomes submissions across a range of disciplines, and publishes both theoretical and practical studies. Contributions from academia and from industry are equally encouraged. Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to): -Structural mechanics and engineering- Structural design and construction management- Structural analysis and computational mechanics- Construction technology and implementation- Construction materials design and engineering- Highway and transport engineering- Bridge and tunnel engineering- Municipal and urban engineering- Coastal, harbour and offshore engineering-- Geotechnical and earthquake engineering Engineering for water, waste, energy, and environmental applications- Hydraulic engineering and fluid mechanics- Surveying, monitoring, and control systems in construction- Health and safety in a civil engineering setting. Advances in Civil Engineering also publishes focused review articles that examine the state of the art, identify emerging trends, and suggest future directions for developing fields.
期刊最新文献
Application of Ecofriendly Geopolymer Binder to Enhance the Strength and Swelling Properties of Expansive Soils Application of Fully Connected Neural Network-Based PyTorch in Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction Influence of Mechanical and Microscopic Properties of Red Sandstone Modified by Different Solid Waste Materials A Comparative Study of Subsurface Profile Using Bore Log Data and Geophysical Method at Mandideep Region, India Mapping Longitudinal and Transverse Displacements of a Dam Crest Based on the Synergy of High-Precision Remote Sensing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1