加强人工智能在医疗机构中的应用:兼顾合规性和患者安全。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocae119
Mark P Sendak, Vincent X Liu, Ashley Beecy, David E Vidal, Keo Shaw, Mark A Lifson, Danny Tobey, Alexandra Valladares, Brenna Loufek, Murtaza Mogri, Suresh Balu
{"title":"加强人工智能在医疗机构中的应用:兼顾合规性和患者安全。","authors":"Mark P Sendak, Vincent X Liu, Ashley Beecy, David E Vidal, Keo Shaw, Mark A Lifson, Danny Tobey, Alexandra Valladares, Brenna Loufek, Murtaza Mogri, Suresh Balu","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocae119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Surface the urgent dilemma that healthcare delivery organizations (HDOs) face navigating the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) final guidance on the use of clinical decision support (CDS) software.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We use sepsis as a case study to highlight the patient safety and regulatory compliance tradeoffs that 6129 hospitals in the United States must navigate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sepsis CDS remains in broad, routine use. There is no commercially available sepsis CDS system that is FDA cleared as a medical device. There is no public disclosure of an HDO turning off sepsis CDS due to regulatory compliance concerns. And there is no public disclosure of FDA enforcement action against an HDO for using sepsis CDS that is not cleared as a medical device.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>We present multiple policy interventions that would relieve the current tension to enable HDOs to utilize artificial intelligence to improve patient care while also addressing FDA concerns about product safety, efficacy, and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":"1622-1627"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11187419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengthening the use of artificial intelligence within healthcare delivery organizations: balancing regulatory compliance and patient safety.\",\"authors\":\"Mark P Sendak, Vincent X Liu, Ashley Beecy, David E Vidal, Keo Shaw, Mark A Lifson, Danny Tobey, Alexandra Valladares, Brenna Loufek, Murtaza Mogri, Suresh Balu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocae119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Surface the urgent dilemma that healthcare delivery organizations (HDOs) face navigating the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) final guidance on the use of clinical decision support (CDS) software.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We use sepsis as a case study to highlight the patient safety and regulatory compliance tradeoffs that 6129 hospitals in the United States must navigate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sepsis CDS remains in broad, routine use. There is no commercially available sepsis CDS system that is FDA cleared as a medical device. There is no public disclosure of an HDO turning off sepsis CDS due to regulatory compliance concerns. And there is no public disclosure of FDA enforcement action against an HDO for using sepsis CDS that is not cleared as a medical device.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>We present multiple policy interventions that would relieve the current tension to enable HDOs to utilize artificial intelligence to improve patient care while also addressing FDA concerns about product safety, efficacy, and equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1622-1627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11187419/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae119\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:揭示医疗机构(HDOs)在美国食品药品管理局(FDA)临床决策支持(CDS)软件使用最终指南中面临的紧迫困境:我们以败血症为案例,强调了美国 6129 家医院必须在患者安全和合规性之间做出权衡:结果:脓毒症 CDS 仍在广泛、常规使用。目前还没有商业化的脓毒症 CDS 系统被 FDA 批准为医疗设备。没有公开披露过 HDO 因合规问题而关闭脓毒症 CDS 的情况。也没有公开披露美国食品及药物管理局对使用未被批准为医疗设备的败血症病理诊断系统的人类发展组织采取执法行动:我们提出了多种政策干预措施,以缓解当前的紧张局势,使人类发展组织能够利用人工智能改善患者护理,同时解决 FDA 对产品安全性、有效性和公平性的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strengthening the use of artificial intelligence within healthcare delivery organizations: balancing regulatory compliance and patient safety.

Objectives: Surface the urgent dilemma that healthcare delivery organizations (HDOs) face navigating the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) final guidance on the use of clinical decision support (CDS) software.

Materials and methods: We use sepsis as a case study to highlight the patient safety and regulatory compliance tradeoffs that 6129 hospitals in the United States must navigate.

Results: Sepsis CDS remains in broad, routine use. There is no commercially available sepsis CDS system that is FDA cleared as a medical device. There is no public disclosure of an HDO turning off sepsis CDS due to regulatory compliance concerns. And there is no public disclosure of FDA enforcement action against an HDO for using sepsis CDS that is not cleared as a medical device.

Discussion and conclusion: We present multiple policy interventions that would relieve the current tension to enable HDOs to utilize artificial intelligence to improve patient care while also addressing FDA concerns about product safety, efficacy, and equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of the mLab App: a randomized clinical trial for increasing HIV testing uptake using mobile technology. Machine learning-based prediction models in medical decision-making in kidney disease: patient, caregiver, and clinician perspectives on trust and appropriate use. Research for all: building a diverse researcher community for the All of Us Research Program. Learning health system linchpins: information exchange and a common data model. Oncointerpreter.ai enables interactive, personalized summarization of cancer diagnostics data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1