{"title":"蒙特利尔(加拿大)的协同工作空间:超越传统的选址模式","authors":"Priscilla Ananian , Richard Shearmur , Marie-Axelle Borde , Ugo Lachapelle , Florence Paulhiac , Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay , Tobi Rodrigue","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using location theory as a starting point, this paper aims to understand how coworking spaces (CSs) locate within the city and how they reacted to the stress of COVID-19. <strong>Through a case study of the city of Montreal (Canada), we show that</strong> most CSs locate in areas of high transit accessibility and in central districts, but there is a trend – possibly accelerated by COVID – towards more suburban locations. These location strategies follow logics similar to those of Knowledge intensive services (KIS), including the tendency of some to agglomerate and of others to disperse. For some CSs, there is also heightened sensitivity to interactions with, and contributions to, the local community. <strong>Hence</strong>, faced with COVID, CSs in transit-accessible places combine an <em>inward strategy,</em> centralizing their activities around members, with a <em>networking strategy</em>, pooling some services and developing partnerships with local or other nearby CSs. <strong>Furthermore</strong>, CSs in <em>peri</em>-central neighbourhoods are the most vulnerable and have adopted <em>retraction strategies</em>. In contrast, CSs located in low accessibility districts outside the agglomeration adopt an <em>expansion strategy,</em> opening new branches near suburban residential areas to attract nearby workers. As hybrid work <strong>evolves</strong>, these results can help urban planners better understand the location rationales of CSs, <strong>how they adapt, and to what extent they bring added value to local urban development.</strong></p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 104016"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524000770/pdfft?md5=84b11a8777b8b97cad1cce55845aaf2e&pid=1-s2.0-S0016718524000770-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coworking spaces in Montreal (Canada): Moving beyond classic location patterns\",\"authors\":\"Priscilla Ananian , Richard Shearmur , Marie-Axelle Borde , Ugo Lachapelle , Florence Paulhiac , Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay , Tobi Rodrigue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using location theory as a starting point, this paper aims to understand how coworking spaces (CSs) locate within the city and how they reacted to the stress of COVID-19. <strong>Through a case study of the city of Montreal (Canada), we show that</strong> most CSs locate in areas of high transit accessibility and in central districts, but there is a trend – possibly accelerated by COVID – towards more suburban locations. These location strategies follow logics similar to those of Knowledge intensive services (KIS), including the tendency of some to agglomerate and of others to disperse. For some CSs, there is also heightened sensitivity to interactions with, and contributions to, the local community. <strong>Hence</strong>, faced with COVID, CSs in transit-accessible places combine an <em>inward strategy,</em> centralizing their activities around members, with a <em>networking strategy</em>, pooling some services and developing partnerships with local or other nearby CSs. <strong>Furthermore</strong>, CSs in <em>peri</em>-central neighbourhoods are the most vulnerable and have adopted <em>retraction strategies</em>. In contrast, CSs located in low accessibility districts outside the agglomeration adopt an <em>expansion strategy,</em> opening new branches near suburban residential areas to attract nearby workers. As hybrid work <strong>evolves</strong>, these results can help urban planners better understand the location rationales of CSs, <strong>how they adapt, and to what extent they bring added value to local urban development.</strong></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524000770/pdfft?md5=84b11a8777b8b97cad1cce55845aaf2e&pid=1-s2.0-S0016718524000770-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524000770\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524000770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Coworking spaces in Montreal (Canada): Moving beyond classic location patterns
Using location theory as a starting point, this paper aims to understand how coworking spaces (CSs) locate within the city and how they reacted to the stress of COVID-19. Through a case study of the city of Montreal (Canada), we show that most CSs locate in areas of high transit accessibility and in central districts, but there is a trend – possibly accelerated by COVID – towards more suburban locations. These location strategies follow logics similar to those of Knowledge intensive services (KIS), including the tendency of some to agglomerate and of others to disperse. For some CSs, there is also heightened sensitivity to interactions with, and contributions to, the local community. Hence, faced with COVID, CSs in transit-accessible places combine an inward strategy, centralizing their activities around members, with a networking strategy, pooling some services and developing partnerships with local or other nearby CSs. Furthermore, CSs in peri-central neighbourhoods are the most vulnerable and have adopted retraction strategies. In contrast, CSs located in low accessibility districts outside the agglomeration adopt an expansion strategy, opening new branches near suburban residential areas to attract nearby workers. As hybrid work evolves, these results can help urban planners better understand the location rationales of CSs, how they adapt, and to what extent they bring added value to local urban development.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.