蒙特利尔(加拿大)的协同工作空间:超越传统的选址模式

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2024-05-19 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104016
Priscilla Ananian , Richard Shearmur , Marie-Axelle Borde , Ugo Lachapelle , Florence Paulhiac , Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay , Tobi Rodrigue
{"title":"蒙特利尔(加拿大)的协同工作空间:超越传统的选址模式","authors":"Priscilla Ananian ,&nbsp;Richard Shearmur ,&nbsp;Marie-Axelle Borde ,&nbsp;Ugo Lachapelle ,&nbsp;Florence Paulhiac ,&nbsp;Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay ,&nbsp;Tobi Rodrigue","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using location theory as a starting point, this paper aims to understand how coworking spaces (CSs) locate within the city and how they reacted to the stress of COVID-19. <strong>Through a case study of the city of Montreal (Canada), we show that</strong> most CSs locate in areas of high transit accessibility and in central districts, but there is a trend – possibly accelerated by COVID – towards more suburban locations. These location strategies follow logics similar to those of Knowledge intensive services (KIS), including the tendency of some to agglomerate and of others to disperse. For some CSs, there is also heightened sensitivity to interactions with, and contributions to, the local community. <strong>Hence</strong>, faced with COVID, CSs in transit-accessible places combine an <em>inward strategy,</em> centralizing their activities around members, with a <em>networking strategy</em>, pooling some services and developing partnerships with local or other nearby CSs. <strong>Furthermore</strong>, CSs in <em>peri</em>-central neighbourhoods are the most vulnerable and have adopted <em>retraction strategies</em>. In contrast, CSs located in low accessibility districts outside the agglomeration adopt an <em>expansion strategy,</em> opening new branches near suburban residential areas to attract nearby workers. As hybrid work <strong>evolves</strong>, these results can help urban planners better understand the location rationales of CSs, <strong>how they adapt, and to what extent they bring added value to local urban development.</strong></p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 104016"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524000770/pdfft?md5=84b11a8777b8b97cad1cce55845aaf2e&pid=1-s2.0-S0016718524000770-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coworking spaces in Montreal (Canada): Moving beyond classic location patterns\",\"authors\":\"Priscilla Ananian ,&nbsp;Richard Shearmur ,&nbsp;Marie-Axelle Borde ,&nbsp;Ugo Lachapelle ,&nbsp;Florence Paulhiac ,&nbsp;Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay ,&nbsp;Tobi Rodrigue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using location theory as a starting point, this paper aims to understand how coworking spaces (CSs) locate within the city and how they reacted to the stress of COVID-19. <strong>Through a case study of the city of Montreal (Canada), we show that</strong> most CSs locate in areas of high transit accessibility and in central districts, but there is a trend – possibly accelerated by COVID – towards more suburban locations. These location strategies follow logics similar to those of Knowledge intensive services (KIS), including the tendency of some to agglomerate and of others to disperse. For some CSs, there is also heightened sensitivity to interactions with, and contributions to, the local community. <strong>Hence</strong>, faced with COVID, CSs in transit-accessible places combine an <em>inward strategy,</em> centralizing their activities around members, with a <em>networking strategy</em>, pooling some services and developing partnerships with local or other nearby CSs. <strong>Furthermore</strong>, CSs in <em>peri</em>-central neighbourhoods are the most vulnerable and have adopted <em>retraction strategies</em>. In contrast, CSs located in low accessibility districts outside the agglomeration adopt an <em>expansion strategy,</em> opening new branches near suburban residential areas to attract nearby workers. As hybrid work <strong>evolves</strong>, these results can help urban planners better understand the location rationales of CSs, <strong>how they adapt, and to what extent they bring added value to local urban development.</strong></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524000770/pdfft?md5=84b11a8777b8b97cad1cce55845aaf2e&pid=1-s2.0-S0016718524000770-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524000770\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524000770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以区位理论为出发点,旨在了解协同工作空间(CSs)在城市中的区位,以及它们如何应对 COVID-19 的压力。通过对蒙特利尔市(加拿大)的案例研究,我们发现大多数协同工作空间都位于交通便利的地区和中心区,但也有一种趋势(可能是 COVID 加速了这一趋势)是向郊区转移。这些选址策略遵循与知识密集型服务(KIS)类似的逻辑,包括一些企业倾向于聚集,另一些则倾向于分散。对于某些企业服务来说,与当地社区的互动和对当地社区的贡献也是非常重要的。因此,面对 COVID,过境便利地区的民间社会组织将内向型战略与网络型战略结合起来,内向型战略是以成员为中心开展活动,而网络型战略则是将一些服务集中起来,并与当地或附近的其他民间社会组织建立伙伴关系。此外,位于近中心街区的民间社会组织最为脆弱,因此采取了收缩战略。与此相反,位于城市群外交通不便地区的企业则采取扩张战略,在郊区住宅区附近开设新的分店,以吸引附近的工人。随着混合工作的发展,这些结果可以帮助城市规划者更好地理解企业社会责任的选址依据、适应方式以及在多大程度上为当地城市发展带来附加值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coworking spaces in Montreal (Canada): Moving beyond classic location patterns

Using location theory as a starting point, this paper aims to understand how coworking spaces (CSs) locate within the city and how they reacted to the stress of COVID-19. Through a case study of the city of Montreal (Canada), we show that most CSs locate in areas of high transit accessibility and in central districts, but there is a trend – possibly accelerated by COVID – towards more suburban locations. These location strategies follow logics similar to those of Knowledge intensive services (KIS), including the tendency of some to agglomerate and of others to disperse. For some CSs, there is also heightened sensitivity to interactions with, and contributions to, the local community. Hence, faced with COVID, CSs in transit-accessible places combine an inward strategy, centralizing their activities around members, with a networking strategy, pooling some services and developing partnerships with local or other nearby CSs. Furthermore, CSs in peri-central neighbourhoods are the most vulnerable and have adopted retraction strategies. In contrast, CSs located in low accessibility districts outside the agglomeration adopt an expansion strategy, opening new branches near suburban residential areas to attract nearby workers. As hybrid work evolves, these results can help urban planners better understand the location rationales of CSs, how they adapt, and to what extent they bring added value to local urban development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the spatial and temporal patterns of housing instability in Malmö Of ships and soundboxes: Contrapuntal explorations of hydrocoloniality and the materiality of music Creative production in the digital age: A network analysis of the digital game industry in China New directions for resilience research: The significance of volume and verticality “Renovate to rent” as a spatio-temporal fix under state entrepreneurialism: Urban renewal through long-term rental apartment development in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1