探索使用电动助力自行车进行道路锻炼的首选负荷模式和生理强度

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101831
Sheng-Chieh Yang , Yun-Ju Lee
{"title":"探索使用电动助力自行车进行道路锻炼的首选负荷模式和生理强度","authors":"Sheng-Chieh Yang ,&nbsp;Yun-Ju Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Electrically-assisted bicycle (e-bike) riding is associated with health and environmental benefits. Through controlling assistive power and transmission settings, e-bike riders could theoretically manage their physical load to a preferred level under environmental resistance. The study aimed to examine whether using e-bikes for transportation can provide health benefits, despite barriers such as control complexity, and to assess if the physical activity associated with e-bike riding meets the recommended health standards.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A simulated indoor e-bike riding session with disturbances of environmental resistance was conducted to investigate riders' preferred load, control behaviors, and physiological and subjective responses. During the riding session, participants completed seven consecutive 3-min stages with preset resistance changes. They were directed to maintain their preferred resistance by adjusting the e-bike's assistive level and transmission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-three non-athlete participants completed the simulated e-bike riding session. The preferred load ranged from 0.92 to 1.17 W/kg (watts/body mass). It resulted in a moderate heart rate (66.77% maximal heart rate), metabolic equivalent of task (5.41 MET), and rate of perceived exertion (RPE: 12). The participants kept a stable intensity, regardless of higher or lower power output demand induced by the environmental resistance. Most of the e-bike controls take place right after external resistance changes. In contrast, only a tiny amount occurred at the end of each stage, indicating the urgent intent to retain the preferred intensity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The preferred riding load and corresponding intensity were characterized by a stable pattern. An e-bike control strategy with a default assistive mode was suggested to automatically keep the rider's load at 0.92–1.17 W/kg, which might decrease the required manual controls, especially in variegated external resistance situations. Moreover, the moderate physiological responses induced by the self-selected intensity meet the criteria for generating health benefits and support the advocacy of on-road exercising by e-bikes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the preferred load pattern and physiological intensity for on-road exercising with electrically assisted bicycles\",\"authors\":\"Sheng-Chieh Yang ,&nbsp;Yun-Ju Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Electrically-assisted bicycle (e-bike) riding is associated with health and environmental benefits. Through controlling assistive power and transmission settings, e-bike riders could theoretically manage their physical load to a preferred level under environmental resistance. The study aimed to examine whether using e-bikes for transportation can provide health benefits, despite barriers such as control complexity, and to assess if the physical activity associated with e-bike riding meets the recommended health standards.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A simulated indoor e-bike riding session with disturbances of environmental resistance was conducted to investigate riders' preferred load, control behaviors, and physiological and subjective responses. During the riding session, participants completed seven consecutive 3-min stages with preset resistance changes. They were directed to maintain their preferred resistance by adjusting the e-bike's assistive level and transmission.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-three non-athlete participants completed the simulated e-bike riding session. The preferred load ranged from 0.92 to 1.17 W/kg (watts/body mass). It resulted in a moderate heart rate (66.77% maximal heart rate), metabolic equivalent of task (5.41 MET), and rate of perceived exertion (RPE: 12). The participants kept a stable intensity, regardless of higher or lower power output demand induced by the environmental resistance. Most of the e-bike controls take place right after external resistance changes. In contrast, only a tiny amount occurred at the end of each stage, indicating the urgent intent to retain the preferred intensity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The preferred riding load and corresponding intensity were characterized by a stable pattern. An e-bike control strategy with a default assistive mode was suggested to automatically keep the rider's load at 0.92–1.17 W/kg, which might decrease the required manual controls, especially in variegated external resistance situations. Moreover, the moderate physiological responses induced by the self-selected intensity meet the criteria for generating health benefits and support the advocacy of on-road exercising by e-bikes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221414052400077X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221414052400077X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言骑电动助力自行车(电动自行车)对健康和环境有益。通过控制辅助动力和传动设置,电动自行车骑行者理论上可以在环境阻力下将身体负荷控制在理想水平。本研究旨在探讨尽管存在控制复杂性等障碍,但使用电动自行车作为交通工具是否能带来健康益处,并评估与电动自行车骑行相关的体力活动是否符合推荐的健康标准。研究方法进行了一次有环境阻力干扰的模拟室内电动自行车骑行,以调查骑行者的首选负荷、控制行为以及生理和主观反应。在骑行过程中,参与者在预设的阻力变化下连续完成七个3分钟的阶段。结果23 名非运动员参加者完成了模拟电动自行车骑行训练。首选负载从 0.92 到 1.17 W/kg(瓦特/体重)不等。其结果是中等心率(最大心率的 66.77%)、任务代谢当量(5.41 MET)和感知消耗率(RPE:12)。无论环境阻力引起的功率输出需求是高是低,参与者都保持稳定的强度。大部分电动自行车控制都发生在外部阻力变化之后。相比之下,只有极少量的控制发生在每个阶段的末尾,这表明了保持首选强度的迫切意图。建议采用具有默认辅助模式的电动自行车控制策略,自动将骑行者的负荷保持在 0.92-1.17 W/kg 的水平,这可能会减少所需的手动控制,尤其是在外部阻力变化较大的情况下。此外,自选强度所引起的适度生理反应符合产生健康益处的标准,支持倡导使用电动自行车进行道路锻炼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the preferred load pattern and physiological intensity for on-road exercising with electrically assisted bicycles

Introduction

Electrically-assisted bicycle (e-bike) riding is associated with health and environmental benefits. Through controlling assistive power and transmission settings, e-bike riders could theoretically manage their physical load to a preferred level under environmental resistance. The study aimed to examine whether using e-bikes for transportation can provide health benefits, despite barriers such as control complexity, and to assess if the physical activity associated with e-bike riding meets the recommended health standards.

Methods

A simulated indoor e-bike riding session with disturbances of environmental resistance was conducted to investigate riders' preferred load, control behaviors, and physiological and subjective responses. During the riding session, participants completed seven consecutive 3-min stages with preset resistance changes. They were directed to maintain their preferred resistance by adjusting the e-bike's assistive level and transmission.

Results

Twenty-three non-athlete participants completed the simulated e-bike riding session. The preferred load ranged from 0.92 to 1.17 W/kg (watts/body mass). It resulted in a moderate heart rate (66.77% maximal heart rate), metabolic equivalent of task (5.41 MET), and rate of perceived exertion (RPE: 12). The participants kept a stable intensity, regardless of higher or lower power output demand induced by the environmental resistance. Most of the e-bike controls take place right after external resistance changes. In contrast, only a tiny amount occurred at the end of each stage, indicating the urgent intent to retain the preferred intensity.

Conclusions

The preferred riding load and corresponding intensity were characterized by a stable pattern. An e-bike control strategy with a default assistive mode was suggested to automatically keep the rider's load at 0.92–1.17 W/kg, which might decrease the required manual controls, especially in variegated external resistance situations. Moreover, the moderate physiological responses induced by the self-selected intensity meet the criteria for generating health benefits and support the advocacy of on-road exercising by e-bikes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Deciphering the character of public transport participation in subjective well-being: Evidence from Hangzhou, China Health in mobility planning: An assessment of how health is considered in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans New challenges arise from consolidation of gender, health and transport research Incident reporting and data monitoring of sexual violence and harassment on public transport Differences between adolescents' and their parents' perceived benefits and barriers to actively commute to school: The PACO y PACA project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1