现代早期西班牙的友谊诗学:唐纳德-吉尔伯特-桑塔玛丽亚著的《文学形式研究》(评论)

IF 0.3 4区 艺术学 Q2 Arts and Humanities BULLETIN OF THE COMEDIANTES Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1353/boc.2022.a927770
Shai Zamir
{"title":"现代早期西班牙的友谊诗学:唐纳德-吉尔伯特-桑塔玛丽亚著的《文学形式研究》(评论)","authors":"Shai Zamir","doi":"10.1353/boc.2022.a927770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Poetics of Friendship in Early Modern Spain: A Study in Literary Form</em> by Donald Gilbert-Santamaría <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Shai Zamir </li> </ul> Donald Gilbert-Santamaría. <em>The Poetics of Friendship in Early Modern Spain: A Study in Literary Form</em> EDINBURGH UP, 2020. 248 PP. <p><strong>THIS STUDY</strong> explores literary representations of ideal friendships and friends. The author argues that such representations were part of a poetic form that emphasized the impossible quest to achieve such sublime relationships in actual, lived human experience. A growing awareness of the scriptedness of literary friendships pushed Spanish writers to question longstanding notions of such ties. Cervantes's novella \"El curioso impertinente,\" intercalated in <em>Don Quijote, Parte 1</em>, delivered the ultimate blow to this tradition: \"The betrayal and death of the two friends, Anselmo and Lotario, and the attendant destruction of the tale of two friends paradigm, may be read … as a symbolic act designed to clear the way for the new literary order of the novel's main narrative\" (10).</p> <p>The book begins with a compelling introduction to the fundamental questions and canonical texts related to friendship, above all Aristotle's <em>Ethics</em> and Cicero's more skeptical responses to it. While Aristotle portrayed friendship as an idealized relationship between the <em>good</em>, Cicero suggested a more pragmatic vision, in which friendships change over time, and friends must adjust themselves accordingly. Such a realist approach allowed Cicero to escape the more general \"problem of epistemological alienation\" described by Gilbert-Santamaría (15): that too perfect of a friendship, for the sake of the friend alone, will lead us to say nothing of importance about the friend, because the friend who is loved for his particular attributes will not be loved for himself (the paradigmatic friend in this tradition is male). The perfect friend is therefore known through acts of self-sacrifice. Cicero, however, chose a different path. In his epistolary writings, he was able to combine the ideals of perfect friendship with the instrumentalist practices of epistolary and gift exchange; one could enjoy friendship and benefit from it aesthetically and rhetorically without giving up on the entire enterprise of virtuous friendship.</p> <p>The plot thickens: Petrarch brought Ciceronian friendship to the attention of early moderns, who practiced the writing and reading of intimate letters in imitation of both him and Cicero. In chapter 1, Gilbert-Santamaría <strong>[End Page 413]</strong> demonstrates that Petrarch's friend, Boccaccio, while at first glance seeming to simply write his own version of perfect friendship in the <em>Decameron</em>, was in fact somewhat satirical. In the story of Gisippus and Titus, what Boccaccio presents as the \"law of human friendship\" might surrender to the \"laws of love\" (39), as when the beautiful Sophronia stands between the two male friends. Even when the two friends commit ultimate acts of self-sacrifice for each other, they still give voice to obstacles to friendship such as passion. Boccaccio's perfect friendship is stained by \"the practical idiosyncrasies of human desire\" (41).</p> <p>In this genealogy, Cervantes's <em>La Galatea</em> (1585), discussed in chapter 2, continues Boccaccio's parody by showing that \"representations of the chaos, unpredictability, and complexity of everyday life repeatedly disrupt the fulfillment of the orthodoxy of perfect friendship\" (56). <em>La Galatea</em> mocks the heroic and selfless acts of pure friendship with typical Cervantine humor. When the friend Timbrio wishes to turn himself in to the authorities to save his friend, he is warned that no one is interested in such gesture, and that the priests who arrested his friend would only get more annoyed by this dramatic act of amity. Gilbert-Santamaría guides the reader to identify several other moments within the plot as the friends deviate from what is expected of them as <em>perfect friends</em>, as when Silerio has to accept a marriage to Blanca, Timbrio's wife's sister. Instead of using the scene to support the notion of the friend as a <em>second self</em> and friendship as a loving act of free will, Cervantes shows how friendship forced Silerio to compromise his true feelings for Timbrio's wife. Friendship stops being the autonomous site of authentic expression.</p> <p>Silerio and Timbrio, like the two friends of the later \"El curioso impertinente\" discussed...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":42292,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF THE COMEDIANTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Poetics of Friendship in Early Modern Spain: A Study in Literary Form by Donald Gilbert-Santamaría (review)\",\"authors\":\"Shai Zamir\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/boc.2022.a927770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Poetics of Friendship in Early Modern Spain: A Study in Literary Form</em> by Donald Gilbert-Santamaría <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Shai Zamir </li> </ul> Donald Gilbert-Santamaría. <em>The Poetics of Friendship in Early Modern Spain: A Study in Literary Form</em> EDINBURGH UP, 2020. 248 PP. <p><strong>THIS STUDY</strong> explores literary representations of ideal friendships and friends. The author argues that such representations were part of a poetic form that emphasized the impossible quest to achieve such sublime relationships in actual, lived human experience. A growing awareness of the scriptedness of literary friendships pushed Spanish writers to question longstanding notions of such ties. Cervantes's novella \\\"El curioso impertinente,\\\" intercalated in <em>Don Quijote, Parte 1</em>, delivered the ultimate blow to this tradition: \\\"The betrayal and death of the two friends, Anselmo and Lotario, and the attendant destruction of the tale of two friends paradigm, may be read … as a symbolic act designed to clear the way for the new literary order of the novel's main narrative\\\" (10).</p> <p>The book begins with a compelling introduction to the fundamental questions and canonical texts related to friendship, above all Aristotle's <em>Ethics</em> and Cicero's more skeptical responses to it. While Aristotle portrayed friendship as an idealized relationship between the <em>good</em>, Cicero suggested a more pragmatic vision, in which friendships change over time, and friends must adjust themselves accordingly. Such a realist approach allowed Cicero to escape the more general \\\"problem of epistemological alienation\\\" described by Gilbert-Santamaría (15): that too perfect of a friendship, for the sake of the friend alone, will lead us to say nothing of importance about the friend, because the friend who is loved for his particular attributes will not be loved for himself (the paradigmatic friend in this tradition is male). The perfect friend is therefore known through acts of self-sacrifice. Cicero, however, chose a different path. In his epistolary writings, he was able to combine the ideals of perfect friendship with the instrumentalist practices of epistolary and gift exchange; one could enjoy friendship and benefit from it aesthetically and rhetorically without giving up on the entire enterprise of virtuous friendship.</p> <p>The plot thickens: Petrarch brought Ciceronian friendship to the attention of early moderns, who practiced the writing and reading of intimate letters in imitation of both him and Cicero. In chapter 1, Gilbert-Santamaría <strong>[End Page 413]</strong> demonstrates that Petrarch's friend, Boccaccio, while at first glance seeming to simply write his own version of perfect friendship in the <em>Decameron</em>, was in fact somewhat satirical. In the story of Gisippus and Titus, what Boccaccio presents as the \\\"law of human friendship\\\" might surrender to the \\\"laws of love\\\" (39), as when the beautiful Sophronia stands between the two male friends. Even when the two friends commit ultimate acts of self-sacrifice for each other, they still give voice to obstacles to friendship such as passion. Boccaccio's perfect friendship is stained by \\\"the practical idiosyncrasies of human desire\\\" (41).</p> <p>In this genealogy, Cervantes's <em>La Galatea</em> (1585), discussed in chapter 2, continues Boccaccio's parody by showing that \\\"representations of the chaos, unpredictability, and complexity of everyday life repeatedly disrupt the fulfillment of the orthodoxy of perfect friendship\\\" (56). <em>La Galatea</em> mocks the heroic and selfless acts of pure friendship with typical Cervantine humor. When the friend Timbrio wishes to turn himself in to the authorities to save his friend, he is warned that no one is interested in such gesture, and that the priests who arrested his friend would only get more annoyed by this dramatic act of amity. Gilbert-Santamaría guides the reader to identify several other moments within the plot as the friends deviate from what is expected of them as <em>perfect friends</em>, as when Silerio has to accept a marriage to Blanca, Timbrio's wife's sister. Instead of using the scene to support the notion of the friend as a <em>second self</em> and friendship as a loving act of free will, Cervantes shows how friendship forced Silerio to compromise his true feelings for Timbrio's wife. Friendship stops being the autonomous site of authentic expression.</p> <p>Silerio and Timbrio, like the two friends of the later \\\"El curioso impertinente\\\" discussed...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BULLETIN OF THE COMEDIANTES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BULLETIN OF THE COMEDIANTES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/boc.2022.a927770\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF THE COMEDIANTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/boc.2022.a927770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 现代早期西班牙的友谊诗学》:唐纳德-吉尔伯特-桑塔玛丽亚 著,文学形式研究 沙伊-扎米尔 译 唐纳德-吉尔伯特-桑塔玛丽亚。现代早期西班牙的友谊诗学》:现代早期西班牙的友谊诗学:文学形式研究》(The Poetics of Friendship in Early Modern Spain: A Study in Literary Form),爱丁堡大学出版社,2020 年。248 PP.本研究探讨了理想友谊和朋友的文学表述。作者认为,这种表述是诗歌形式的一部分,它强调的是在实际的人类生活经验中实现这种崇高关系的不可能的追求。西班牙作家越来越意识到文学友谊的剧本性,从而对这种关系的长期观念提出质疑。塞万提斯的长篇小说《无礼的好奇心》(El curioso impertinente)被插叙在《堂吉诃德》第一部中,对这一传统造成了终极打击:"安塞尔莫和洛塔里奥这两个朋友的背叛和死亡,以及随之而来的两个朋友范例故事的毁灭,可以被解读为......旨在为小说主要叙事的新文学秩序扫清道路的象征性行为"(10)。本书一开始就引人入胜地介绍了与友谊有关的基本问题和经典文本,首先是亚里士多德的《伦理学》和西塞罗对友谊持怀疑态度的回应。亚里士多德将友谊描绘成一种理想化的善者之间的关系,而西塞罗则提出了一种更为务实的观点,即友谊会随着时间的推移而发生变化,朋友必须相应地调整自己。这种现实主义的方法让西塞罗摆脱了吉尔伯特-桑塔玛丽亚(Gilbert-Santamaría)(15)所描述的更为普遍的 "认识论异化问题":过于完美的友谊,仅仅是为了朋友,会导致我们对朋友的重要意义只字不提,因为因其特殊属性而被爱的朋友不会因其自身而被爱(这一传统中的典型朋友是男性)。因此,完美的朋友是通过自我牺牲的行为而为人所知的。然而,西塞罗选择了一条不同的道路。在他的书信体著作中,他能够将完美友谊的理想与书信和礼物交换的工具主义实践结合起来;人们可以享受友谊,并在美学和修辞上从中受益,而不会放弃整个良性友谊事业。情节更加复杂:彼特拉克将西塞罗式的友谊带入了早期现代人的视野,他们模仿彼特拉克和西塞罗,练习书写和阅读亲密信件。在第 1 章中,吉尔伯特-桑塔玛丽亚 [尾页 413]指出,彼特拉克的朋友薄伽丘在《十日谈》中写下的完美友谊,乍一看似乎只是他自己的版本,但实际上却带有一定的讽刺意味。在吉西普斯和提图斯的故事中,薄伽丘笔下的 "人类友谊法则 "可能会屈服于 "爱情法则"(39),就像美丽的索芙罗妮娅站在两个男性朋友中间一样。即使这两位朋友为彼此做出了终极的自我牺牲,他们仍然为激情等友谊的障碍发出了声音。薄伽丘笔下的完美友谊被 "人类欲望的实际怪癖 "所玷污(41)。在这一谱系中,第 2 章讨论的塞万提斯的《加拉蒂亚》(1585 年)延续了薄伽丘的戏仿风格,表现出 "日常生活的混乱、不可预测性和复杂性一再破坏完美友谊正统观念的实现"(56)。加拉蒂亚》以典型的塞万提斯式幽默嘲弄了纯洁友谊的英雄主义和无私奉献行为。当朋友 Timbrio 希望向当局自首以拯救他的朋友时,他被警告说,没有人会对这种举动感兴趣,逮捕他朋友的牧师只会对这种戏剧性的友好行为更加恼火。吉尔伯特-桑塔玛丽亚引导读者找出情节中的其他几个时刻,因为朋友们偏离了人们对他们作为完美朋友的期望,比如西莱里奥不得不接受与布兰卡的婚姻,布兰卡是蒂姆布里奥妻子的妹妹。塞万提斯没有用这个场景来支持朋友是第二个自我、友谊是自由意志的爱的行为这一概念,而是展示了友谊是如何迫使西莱里奥向廷布里奥妻子的真实感情妥协的。友谊不再是真实表达的自主场所。西莱里奥和廷布里奥,就像后来的《无礼的好奇心》中所讨论的两位朋友一样......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Poetics of Friendship in Early Modern Spain: A Study in Literary Form by Donald Gilbert-Santamaría (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The Poetics of Friendship in Early Modern Spain: A Study in Literary Form by Donald Gilbert-Santamaría
  • Shai Zamir
Donald Gilbert-Santamaría. The Poetics of Friendship in Early Modern Spain: A Study in Literary Form EDINBURGH UP, 2020. 248 PP.

THIS STUDY explores literary representations of ideal friendships and friends. The author argues that such representations were part of a poetic form that emphasized the impossible quest to achieve such sublime relationships in actual, lived human experience. A growing awareness of the scriptedness of literary friendships pushed Spanish writers to question longstanding notions of such ties. Cervantes's novella "El curioso impertinente," intercalated in Don Quijote, Parte 1, delivered the ultimate blow to this tradition: "The betrayal and death of the two friends, Anselmo and Lotario, and the attendant destruction of the tale of two friends paradigm, may be read … as a symbolic act designed to clear the way for the new literary order of the novel's main narrative" (10).

The book begins with a compelling introduction to the fundamental questions and canonical texts related to friendship, above all Aristotle's Ethics and Cicero's more skeptical responses to it. While Aristotle portrayed friendship as an idealized relationship between the good, Cicero suggested a more pragmatic vision, in which friendships change over time, and friends must adjust themselves accordingly. Such a realist approach allowed Cicero to escape the more general "problem of epistemological alienation" described by Gilbert-Santamaría (15): that too perfect of a friendship, for the sake of the friend alone, will lead us to say nothing of importance about the friend, because the friend who is loved for his particular attributes will not be loved for himself (the paradigmatic friend in this tradition is male). The perfect friend is therefore known through acts of self-sacrifice. Cicero, however, chose a different path. In his epistolary writings, he was able to combine the ideals of perfect friendship with the instrumentalist practices of epistolary and gift exchange; one could enjoy friendship and benefit from it aesthetically and rhetorically without giving up on the entire enterprise of virtuous friendship.

The plot thickens: Petrarch brought Ciceronian friendship to the attention of early moderns, who practiced the writing and reading of intimate letters in imitation of both him and Cicero. In chapter 1, Gilbert-Santamaría [End Page 413] demonstrates that Petrarch's friend, Boccaccio, while at first glance seeming to simply write his own version of perfect friendship in the Decameron, was in fact somewhat satirical. In the story of Gisippus and Titus, what Boccaccio presents as the "law of human friendship" might surrender to the "laws of love" (39), as when the beautiful Sophronia stands between the two male friends. Even when the two friends commit ultimate acts of self-sacrifice for each other, they still give voice to obstacles to friendship such as passion. Boccaccio's perfect friendship is stained by "the practical idiosyncrasies of human desire" (41).

In this genealogy, Cervantes's La Galatea (1585), discussed in chapter 2, continues Boccaccio's parody by showing that "representations of the chaos, unpredictability, and complexity of everyday life repeatedly disrupt the fulfillment of the orthodoxy of perfect friendship" (56). La Galatea mocks the heroic and selfless acts of pure friendship with typical Cervantine humor. When the friend Timbrio wishes to turn himself in to the authorities to save his friend, he is warned that no one is interested in such gesture, and that the priests who arrested his friend would only get more annoyed by this dramatic act of amity. Gilbert-Santamaría guides the reader to identify several other moments within the plot as the friends deviate from what is expected of them as perfect friends, as when Silerio has to accept a marriage to Blanca, Timbrio's wife's sister. Instead of using the scene to support the notion of the friend as a second self and friendship as a loving act of free will, Cervantes shows how friendship forced Silerio to compromise his true feelings for Timbrio's wife. Friendship stops being the autonomous site of authentic expression.

Silerio and Timbrio, like the two friends of the later "El curioso impertinente" discussed...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Published semiannually by the Comediantes, an international group of scholars interested in early modern Hispanic theater, the Bulletin welcomes articles and notes in Spanish and English dealing with sixteenth- and seventeenth-century peninsular and colonial Latin American drama. Submissions are refereed by at least two specialists in the field. In order to expedite a decision.
期刊最新文献
Sonido y afecto en Calderón. Un estudio de las asonancias by Simon Kroll (review) Arms and Letters: Military Life Writing in Early Modern Spain by Faith S. Harden (review) James A. Parr, sin par (1936–2022): Editor, Bulletin of the Comediantes 1973–98 PART II "¡A ver la comeria nueva / que la negla representa!": Villancicos de negros en la Bogotá virreinal Afrodescendientes que hablan quechua: Risa, agencia y resistencia en dos entremeses del convento de Santa Teresa (Villa Imperial de Potosí)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1