未来能源组合的综合生命周期可持续性评估:多种发电技术发展可持续性评估方法综述

IF 4.2 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable Energy Focus Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ref.2024.100581
Mohammad Hemmati, Navid Bayati, Thomas Ebel
{"title":"未来能源组合的综合生命周期可持续性评估:多种发电技术发展可持续性评估方法综述","authors":"Mohammad Hemmati,&nbsp;Navid Bayati,&nbsp;Thomas Ebel","doi":"10.1016/j.ref.2024.100581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One key driver of sustainable goal development is the transition to sustainable electricity resources. The sustainability impact assessment of power production evaluates all potential impacts on society, the environment, and the economy, as well as finds a reasonable solution to shift towards renewable. Given the multitude of quantitative and qualitative methodologies for sustainability analysis, alongside the absence of a unified procedure, selecting an appropriate method poses a significant challenge in conducting this task. Therefore, this paper conducts an extensive review of the methodologies employed for assessing the sustainability of power generation within the future energy mix, as reflected in scientific publications over the past decade (2013–2024). The main objective of this paper is to compare the methodologies and assess their efficiency as suitable tools for analyzing the sustainability of technologies in different geographical regions. The research methodology, following the screening process, selects 102 papers within the study’s scope to undergo a critical examination based on sustainability evaluation approaches. It also provides an overview of novel dynamic methods and the application of artificial intelligence in sustainability assessment. The primary findings indicate a deficiency in a standardized approach for sustainability evaluation within electrical technology. In addressing uncertainties in impact assessment due to various parameters, dynamic methods with multiple temporal accuracies are recommended over a static life cycle. The paper includes a case study comparing methods—multi-criteria decision-making, and ranking, scoring—in the Indonesian context. Considering 15 environmental, social, and economic indicators to evaluate the sustainability in Lombok, results indicate that hydropower, gas, and solar technologies exhibit the highest sustainability scores, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29780,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy Focus","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100581"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008424000450/pdfft?md5=bd0df0beab81f9011c5659d4e0c125ef&pid=1-s2.0-S1755008424000450-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated life cycle sustainability assessment with future energy mix: A review of methodologies for evaluating the sustainability of multiple power generation technologies development\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Hemmati,&nbsp;Navid Bayati,&nbsp;Thomas Ebel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ref.2024.100581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>One key driver of sustainable goal development is the transition to sustainable electricity resources. The sustainability impact assessment of power production evaluates all potential impacts on society, the environment, and the economy, as well as finds a reasonable solution to shift towards renewable. Given the multitude of quantitative and qualitative methodologies for sustainability analysis, alongside the absence of a unified procedure, selecting an appropriate method poses a significant challenge in conducting this task. Therefore, this paper conducts an extensive review of the methodologies employed for assessing the sustainability of power generation within the future energy mix, as reflected in scientific publications over the past decade (2013–2024). The main objective of this paper is to compare the methodologies and assess their efficiency as suitable tools for analyzing the sustainability of technologies in different geographical regions. The research methodology, following the screening process, selects 102 papers within the study’s scope to undergo a critical examination based on sustainability evaluation approaches. It also provides an overview of novel dynamic methods and the application of artificial intelligence in sustainability assessment. The primary findings indicate a deficiency in a standardized approach for sustainability evaluation within electrical technology. In addressing uncertainties in impact assessment due to various parameters, dynamic methods with multiple temporal accuracies are recommended over a static life cycle. The paper includes a case study comparing methods—multi-criteria decision-making, and ranking, scoring—in the Indonesian context. Considering 15 environmental, social, and economic indicators to evaluate the sustainability in Lombok, results indicate that hydropower, gas, and solar technologies exhibit the highest sustainability scores, respectively.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable Energy Focus\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008424000450/pdfft?md5=bd0df0beab81f9011c5659d4e0c125ef&pid=1-s2.0-S1755008424000450-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable Energy Focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008424000450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008424000450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续目标发展的一个关键驱动力是向可持续电力资源过渡。对电力生产的可持续性影响进行评估,就是要评估对社会、环境和经济的所有潜在影响,并找到向可再生能源转变的合理解决方案。由于可持续性分析的定量和定性方法众多,而且缺乏统一的程序,因此选择合适的方法是开展这项工作的重大挑战。因此,本文对过去十年(2013-2024 年)科学出版物中反映的用于评估未来能源组合中发电可持续性的方法进行了广泛综述。本文的主要目的是对这些方法进行比较,并评估其作为分析不同地理区域技术可持续性的合适工具的效率。研究方法经过筛选,在研究范围内选出 102 篇论文,根据可持续性评估方法进行严格审查。研究还概述了新型动态方法和人工智能在可持续性评估中的应用。主要研究结果表明,电气技术的可持续性评估缺乏标准化方法。为解决各种参数对影响评估造成的不确定性,建议在静态生命周期内采用具有多种时间精度的动态方法。本文包括一项案例研究,比较了印尼的多标准决策、排序和评分方法。通过 15 项环境、社会和经济指标对龙目岛的可持续性进行评估,结果表明水电、天然气和太阳能技术的可持续性得分最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrated life cycle sustainability assessment with future energy mix: A review of methodologies for evaluating the sustainability of multiple power generation technologies development

One key driver of sustainable goal development is the transition to sustainable electricity resources. The sustainability impact assessment of power production evaluates all potential impacts on society, the environment, and the economy, as well as finds a reasonable solution to shift towards renewable. Given the multitude of quantitative and qualitative methodologies for sustainability analysis, alongside the absence of a unified procedure, selecting an appropriate method poses a significant challenge in conducting this task. Therefore, this paper conducts an extensive review of the methodologies employed for assessing the sustainability of power generation within the future energy mix, as reflected in scientific publications over the past decade (2013–2024). The main objective of this paper is to compare the methodologies and assess their efficiency as suitable tools for analyzing the sustainability of technologies in different geographical regions. The research methodology, following the screening process, selects 102 papers within the study’s scope to undergo a critical examination based on sustainability evaluation approaches. It also provides an overview of novel dynamic methods and the application of artificial intelligence in sustainability assessment. The primary findings indicate a deficiency in a standardized approach for sustainability evaluation within electrical technology. In addressing uncertainties in impact assessment due to various parameters, dynamic methods with multiple temporal accuracies are recommended over a static life cycle. The paper includes a case study comparing methods—multi-criteria decision-making, and ranking, scoring—in the Indonesian context. Considering 15 environmental, social, and economic indicators to evaluate the sustainability in Lombok, results indicate that hydropower, gas, and solar technologies exhibit the highest sustainability scores, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Energy Focus
Renewable Energy Focus Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Optimal control strategy for enhancing energy efficiency of Pelamis wave energy converter: a Simulink-based simulation approach Management and control strategy of multiple frequency powers in multifrequency microgrid Emerging Trends in Active Distribution Network Fault Detection Advanced control strategies for grid-following inverter fault response: Implementation and analysis in MATLAB for protection studies in medium voltage distribution networks Exploring deep learning methods for solar photovoltaic power output forecasting: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1