印度达克希纳卡纳达 COVID-19 康复患者的心血管自律性评估和体脂肪分析。

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-04-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1081_23
Grrishma Balakrishnan, Shobith Bangera, Kalpana Balasubramaniyam, Padmini Thalanjeri, Nabeel Beeran, Gurunandan Uppinakudru, Anwar Amemar Soofi
{"title":"印度达克希纳卡纳达 COVID-19 康复患者的心血管自律性评估和体脂肪分析。","authors":"Grrishma Balakrishnan, Shobith Bangera, Kalpana Balasubramaniyam, Padmini Thalanjeri, Nabeel Beeran, Gurunandan Uppinakudru, Anwar Amemar Soofi","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1081_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pandemic, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to a heavy toll on the human health. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of body fat distribution, evolving long-term effect on autonomic function, and its correlation with Chalder Fatigue Severity Score in post-COVID-19-recovered individuals of Indian ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>A case-control study was conducted in the Department of Physiology on 31 cases and 29 age- and gender-matched controls. Cardiovascular evaluation including heart rate variability (HRV), galvanic skin response (GSR), body fat analysis, and Chalder Fatigue Severity Score was performed on the study participants. The continuous variables of basal anthropometric parameters, GSR values, HRV indices, and body fat parameters are expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was significantly increased among cases (<i>P</i> = 0.04). GSR (average) for cases is higher when compared to controls and was borderline significant (<i>P</i> = 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the HRV parameters. Cases showed significantly higher body fat distribution as compared to the control group indicating increased susceptibility of the obese population to COVID-19. Chalder's post-COVID-19 Fatigue Severity Score of cases showed a negative correlation with LF:HF and RMSSD but it was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, we conclude that there was a significant increase in DBP and GSR (average) with significantly higher visceral fat percentage, body fat percentage, subcutaneous fat percentage, skeletal muscle percentage, and trunk fat percentage in cases as compared to the control group suggestive of higher propensity of obese individuals suffering from COVID-19 and resulting in dysautonomia as compared to the controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular autonomic evaluation and body fat analysis in COVID-19-recovered patients in Dakshina Kannada, India.\",\"authors\":\"Grrishma Balakrishnan, Shobith Bangera, Kalpana Balasubramaniyam, Padmini Thalanjeri, Nabeel Beeran, Gurunandan Uppinakudru, Anwar Amemar Soofi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1081_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pandemic, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to a heavy toll on the human health. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of body fat distribution, evolving long-term effect on autonomic function, and its correlation with Chalder Fatigue Severity Score in post-COVID-19-recovered individuals of Indian ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>A case-control study was conducted in the Department of Physiology on 31 cases and 29 age- and gender-matched controls. Cardiovascular evaluation including heart rate variability (HRV), galvanic skin response (GSR), body fat analysis, and Chalder Fatigue Severity Score was performed on the study participants. The continuous variables of basal anthropometric parameters, GSR values, HRV indices, and body fat parameters are expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was significantly increased among cases (<i>P</i> = 0.04). GSR (average) for cases is higher when compared to controls and was borderline significant (<i>P</i> = 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the HRV parameters. Cases showed significantly higher body fat distribution as compared to the control group indicating increased susceptibility of the obese population to COVID-19. Chalder's post-COVID-19 Fatigue Severity Score of cases showed a negative correlation with LF:HF and RMSSD but it was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, we conclude that there was a significant increase in DBP and GSR (average) with significantly higher visceral fat percentage, body fat percentage, subcutaneous fat percentage, skeletal muscle percentage, and trunk fat percentage in cases as compared to the control group suggestive of higher propensity of obese individuals suffering from COVID-19 and resulting in dysautonomia as compared to the controls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114587/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1081_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1081_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给人类健康造成了严重损失。本研究旨在确定体脂分布的影响、对自律神经功能的长期演变影响及其与印度裔 COVID-19 后康复者 Chalder 疲劳严重程度评分的相关性:生理学系对 31 例病例和 29 例年龄与性别匹配的对照组进行了病例对照研究。对研究参与者进行了心血管评估,包括心率变异性(HRV)、皮肤电反应(GSR)、体脂分析和 Chalder 疲劳严重程度评分。基础人体测量参数、GSR 值、心率变异指数和体脂肪参数等连续变量以平均值和标准差(SD)表示:结果:病例的舒张压(DBP)明显升高(P = 0.04)。与对照组相比,病例的 GSR(平均值)较高,且具有边缘显著性(P = 0.05)。心率变异参数在统计学上没有明显差异。与对照组相比,病例的体脂分布明显更高,这表明肥胖人群对 COVID-19 的易感性更高。病例的 Chalder's COVID-19 后疲劳严重程度评分与 LF:HF 和 RMSSD 呈负相关,但无统计学意义:在我们的研究中,我们得出的结论是,与对照组相比,病例的 DBP 和 GSR(平均值)显著增加,内脏脂肪百分比、体脂百分比、皮下脂肪百分比、骨骼肌百分比和躯干脂肪百分比显著增加,这表明与对照组相比,肥胖者患 COVID-19 并导致自律神经失调的倾向性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiovascular autonomic evaluation and body fat analysis in COVID-19-recovered patients in Dakshina Kannada, India.

Background: The pandemic, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to a heavy toll on the human health. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of body fat distribution, evolving long-term effect on autonomic function, and its correlation with Chalder Fatigue Severity Score in post-COVID-19-recovered individuals of Indian ethnicity.

Materials and method: A case-control study was conducted in the Department of Physiology on 31 cases and 29 age- and gender-matched controls. Cardiovascular evaluation including heart rate variability (HRV), galvanic skin response (GSR), body fat analysis, and Chalder Fatigue Severity Score was performed on the study participants. The continuous variables of basal anthropometric parameters, GSR values, HRV indices, and body fat parameters are expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD).

Results: Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was significantly increased among cases (P = 0.04). GSR (average) for cases is higher when compared to controls and was borderline significant (P = 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the HRV parameters. Cases showed significantly higher body fat distribution as compared to the control group indicating increased susceptibility of the obese population to COVID-19. Chalder's post-COVID-19 Fatigue Severity Score of cases showed a negative correlation with LF:HF and RMSSD but it was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: In our study, we conclude that there was a significant increase in DBP and GSR (average) with significantly higher visceral fat percentage, body fat percentage, subcutaneous fat percentage, skeletal muscle percentage, and trunk fat percentage in cases as compared to the control group suggestive of higher propensity of obese individuals suffering from COVID-19 and resulting in dysautonomia as compared to the controls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of training nursing process using the concept map on caring self-efficacy of nursing students in pediatric departments. Ethical and moral principles for oncology healthcare workers: A brief report from a Bioethics consortium emphasizing on need for education. Evaluation of antenatal care utilization and its effects on obstetric and newborn outcomes at a public and private hospital of Karnataka: A comparative study. Factors influencing knowledge sharing between scientific specialists in knowledge networks and communities of practice: A systematic literature review. Home-based supportive and health care services based on functional ability in older adults in Iran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1