为全民医保筹资:保费还是工资税?

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS European Economic Review Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104755
Hans Fehr , Maria Feldman
{"title":"为全民医保筹资:保费还是工资税?","authors":"Hans Fehr ,&nbsp;Maria Feldman","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a stochastic overlapping generations model with endogenous health investment to study the transition from the existing hybrid health insurance system in Germany towards a uniform system, financed by either funded or unfunded premiums or payroll taxes.</p><p>Our simulation results highlight the insurance properties of payroll taxes, but also their cost in terms of labor supply distortions and moral hazard. We find that compulsory deductibles decrease aggregate welfare in Germany, although they reduce moral hazard and increase private health investment. Reform models with premiums also induce precautionary behavior and increase labor supply, but at the same time increase exposure to productivity risk. Since the introduction of a funded system is costly for transitional cohorts, unfunded premiums provide the highest efficiency gains in our framework.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financing universal health care: Premiums or payroll taxes?\",\"authors\":\"Hans Fehr ,&nbsp;Maria Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents a stochastic overlapping generations model with endogenous health investment to study the transition from the existing hybrid health insurance system in Germany towards a uniform system, financed by either funded or unfunded premiums or payroll taxes.</p><p>Our simulation results highlight the insurance properties of payroll taxes, but also their cost in terms of labor supply distortions and moral hazard. We find that compulsory deductibles decrease aggregate welfare in Germany, although they reduce moral hazard and increase private health investment. Reform models with premiums also induce precautionary behavior and increase labor supply, but at the same time increase exposure to productivity risk. Since the introduction of a funded system is costly for transitional cohorts, unfunded premiums provide the highest efficiency gains in our framework.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Economic Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292124000849\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292124000849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个具有内生健康投资的随机世代重叠模型,以研究德国从现有的混合医疗保险制度向统一制度过渡的问题,统一制度的资金来源是有资金或无资金保障的保险费或工资税。我们发现,在德国,强制性免赔额降低了总体福利,尽管它们减少了道德风险并增加了私人医疗投资。有保费的改革模式也会诱发预防行为,增加劳动力供给,但同时也会增加生产风险。由于引入资助制度对过渡人群来说成本高昂,因此在我们的框架中,无资助保费的效率收益最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Financing universal health care: Premiums or payroll taxes?

This paper presents a stochastic overlapping generations model with endogenous health investment to study the transition from the existing hybrid health insurance system in Germany towards a uniform system, financed by either funded or unfunded premiums or payroll taxes.

Our simulation results highlight the insurance properties of payroll taxes, but also their cost in terms of labor supply distortions and moral hazard. We find that compulsory deductibles decrease aggregate welfare in Germany, although they reduce moral hazard and increase private health investment. Reform models with premiums also induce precautionary behavior and increase labor supply, but at the same time increase exposure to productivity risk. Since the introduction of a funded system is costly for transitional cohorts, unfunded premiums provide the highest efficiency gains in our framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: The European Economic Review (EER) started publishing in 1969 as the first research journal specifically aiming to contribute to the development and application of economics as a science in Europe. As a broad-based professional and international journal, the EER welcomes submissions of applied and theoretical research papers in all fields of economics. The aim of the EER is to contribute to the development of the science of economics and its applications, as well as to improve communication between academic researchers, teachers and policy makers across the European continent and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Regional variations in corporate tax responsiveness: Evidence from Switzerland Editorial Board Effects of extending paid parental leave on children’s socio-emotional skills and well-being in adolescence Identifying and quantifying the extraterritorial effects of sanctions Targeted monetary policy, dual rates, and bank risk-taking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1