重新安排工作,在原有工作的全面中断与新工作的灵活性和调度成本之间进行权衡

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Omega-international Journal of Management Science Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2024.103114
Rubing Chen , T.C.E. Cheng , C.T. Ng , Jun-Qiang Wang , Hongjun Wei , Jinjiang Yuan
{"title":"重新安排工作,在原有工作的全面中断与新工作的灵活性和调度成本之间进行权衡","authors":"Rubing Chen ,&nbsp;T.C.E. Cheng ,&nbsp;C.T. Ng ,&nbsp;Jun-Qiang Wang ,&nbsp;Hongjun Wei ,&nbsp;Jinjiang Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper we introduce and study the rescheduling problem to trade off between global disruption of the original jobs with flexibility and the scheduling cost of the new jobs. A set of original jobs has been scheduled on a single machine. But before the processing of original jobs begins, a set of new jobs arrives unexpectedly. The scheduler needs to adjust the existing schedule with a view to finding a cost-efficient schedule for the new jobs without causing too much disruption of the original schedule. We make three assumptions that are different from those in the literature: (i) the original jobs are regarded as a unified whole (a big job) and the global disruption of the original jobs is considered, (ii) the original jobs can be split into small pieces in a schedule, which enables effective control of the global disruption, and (iii) the cost of the original jobs depends on the global disruption, while the cost of the new jobs is expressed as a regular scheduling criterion, such as the maximum lateness, the total weighted completion time, and total weighted number of tardy jobs. We analyze the computational complexity of variants of the rescheduling problem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 103114"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rescheduling to trade off between global disruption of original jobs with flexibility and scheduling cost of new jobs\",\"authors\":\"Rubing Chen ,&nbsp;T.C.E. Cheng ,&nbsp;C.T. Ng ,&nbsp;Jun-Qiang Wang ,&nbsp;Hongjun Wei ,&nbsp;Jinjiang Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper we introduce and study the rescheduling problem to trade off between global disruption of the original jobs with flexibility and the scheduling cost of the new jobs. A set of original jobs has been scheduled on a single machine. But before the processing of original jobs begins, a set of new jobs arrives unexpectedly. The scheduler needs to adjust the existing schedule with a view to finding a cost-efficient schedule for the new jobs without causing too much disruption of the original schedule. We make three assumptions that are different from those in the literature: (i) the original jobs are regarded as a unified whole (a big job) and the global disruption of the original jobs is considered, (ii) the original jobs can be split into small pieces in a schedule, which enables effective control of the global disruption, and (iii) the cost of the original jobs depends on the global disruption, while the cost of the new jobs is expressed as a regular scheduling criterion, such as the maximum lateness, the total weighted completion time, and total weighted number of tardy jobs. We analyze the computational complexity of variants of the rescheduling problem.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504832400080X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504832400080X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们介绍并研究了重新调度问题,以在具有灵活性的原始作业的全局中断和新作业的调度成本之间进行权衡。一组原始作业已被调度到一台机器上。但在开始处理原始作业之前,一组新作业突然到来。调度员需要调整现有计划,以便为新工作找到一个经济高效的计划,同时又不会对原有计划造成太大干扰。我们提出了三个与文献不同的假设:(i) 将原有工作视为一个统一的整体(大工作),并考虑原有工作的全局中断;(ii) 在一个计划中,原有工作可以被分割成小块,从而有效控制全局中断;(iii) 原有工作的成本取决于全局中断,而新工作的成本则用常规调度准则来表示,如最大迟到时间、总加权完成时间和总加权迟到工作数。我们分析了重新安排问题变体的计算复杂度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rescheduling to trade off between global disruption of original jobs with flexibility and scheduling cost of new jobs

In this paper we introduce and study the rescheduling problem to trade off between global disruption of the original jobs with flexibility and the scheduling cost of the new jobs. A set of original jobs has been scheduled on a single machine. But before the processing of original jobs begins, a set of new jobs arrives unexpectedly. The scheduler needs to adjust the existing schedule with a view to finding a cost-efficient schedule for the new jobs without causing too much disruption of the original schedule. We make three assumptions that are different from those in the literature: (i) the original jobs are regarded as a unified whole (a big job) and the global disruption of the original jobs is considered, (ii) the original jobs can be split into small pieces in a schedule, which enables effective control of the global disruption, and (iii) the cost of the original jobs depends on the global disruption, while the cost of the new jobs is expressed as a regular scheduling criterion, such as the maximum lateness, the total weighted completion time, and total weighted number of tardy jobs. We analyze the computational complexity of variants of the rescheduling problem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
期刊最新文献
Economically viable reshoring of supply chains under ripple effect The role of hubs and economies of scale in network expansion Evolutive multi-attribute decision making with online consumer reviews Managing supply disruptions for risk-averse buyers: Diversified sourcing vs. disruption prevention Elevating the corporate social responsibility level: A media supervision mechanism based on the Stackelberg-Evolutionary game model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1