饲粮对鲦鱼幼体 7 天亚慢性生长终点的影响:全氟辛烷磺酸案例研究。

IF 3.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s00244-024-01068-8
Jonna Boyda, David Moore, Paige Krupa, Ashley Kimble, Thomas Biber, Lauren May, Alan Kennedy
{"title":"饲粮对鲦鱼幼体 7 天亚慢性生长终点的影响:全氟辛烷磺酸案例研究。","authors":"Jonna Boyda,&nbsp;David Moore,&nbsp;Paige Krupa,&nbsp;Ashley Kimble,&nbsp;Thomas Biber,&nbsp;Lauren May,&nbsp;Alan Kennedy","doi":"10.1007/s00244-024-01068-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The larval fathead minnow, <i>Pimephales promelas</i>, 7-day subchronic survival and growth standard toxicity test method is commonly used for research and regulatory testing of effluents and compounds, including emerging contaminants such as Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS). Existing feeding guidelines for testing are described in multiple methods but are open to interpretation. The current study sought to determine the impact of feeding ration on <i>P. promelas</i> survival and biomass during a subchronic exposure to PFOS. The study was conducted in two phases: (1) a control experiment to determine the most significant feeding ration factors that maximize biomass, with consideration to laboratory logistics, and (2) application of down-selected feeding rations in a PFOS exposure to determine toxicity reference values. The control optimization study supported that feeding ration and feeding frequency were significant factors in fish biomass. In the subsequent PFOS study, fish were fed a high or low ration of <i>Artemia</i> twice daily, while exposed to 0.3 to 3.4 mg/L PFOS. Fish fed a high ration of <i>Artemia</i> had significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) greater biomass than fish fed a low ration in all exposure concentrations except 3.4 mg/L, where survival was low in both treatments. The feeding ration was not a significant factor on the survival endpoint for either treatment, but the PFOS concentration was (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) (high ration LC<sub>50</sub> = 2.44 mg/L; low ration LC<sub>50</sub> = 2.25 mg/L). These findings contribute to a better understanding of the impact feeding ration has in toxicity assessments and downstream regulatory decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8377,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11142975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feeding Ration Impacts Larval Pimephales Promelas 7-Day Subchronic Growth Endpoint: Case Study with Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid\",\"authors\":\"Jonna Boyda,&nbsp;David Moore,&nbsp;Paige Krupa,&nbsp;Ashley Kimble,&nbsp;Thomas Biber,&nbsp;Lauren May,&nbsp;Alan Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00244-024-01068-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The larval fathead minnow, <i>Pimephales promelas</i>, 7-day subchronic survival and growth standard toxicity test method is commonly used for research and regulatory testing of effluents and compounds, including emerging contaminants such as Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS). Existing feeding guidelines for testing are described in multiple methods but are open to interpretation. The current study sought to determine the impact of feeding ration on <i>P. promelas</i> survival and biomass during a subchronic exposure to PFOS. The study was conducted in two phases: (1) a control experiment to determine the most significant feeding ration factors that maximize biomass, with consideration to laboratory logistics, and (2) application of down-selected feeding rations in a PFOS exposure to determine toxicity reference values. The control optimization study supported that feeding ration and feeding frequency were significant factors in fish biomass. In the subsequent PFOS study, fish were fed a high or low ration of <i>Artemia</i> twice daily, while exposed to 0.3 to 3.4 mg/L PFOS. Fish fed a high ration of <i>Artemia</i> had significantly (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) greater biomass than fish fed a low ration in all exposure concentrations except 3.4 mg/L, where survival was low in both treatments. The feeding ration was not a significant factor on the survival endpoint for either treatment, but the PFOS concentration was (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) (high ration LC<sub>50</sub> = 2.44 mg/L; low ration LC<sub>50</sub> = 2.25 mg/L). These findings contribute to a better understanding of the impact feeding ration has in toxicity assessments and downstream regulatory decisions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11142975/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00244-024-01068-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00244-024-01068-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黑头鲦鱼幼体 7 天亚慢性存活和生长标准毒性测试方法常用于对污水和化合物(包括全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)等新出现的污染物)进行研究和监管测试。现有的喂养测试准则在多种方法中均有描述,但解释不一。本研究旨在确定在亚慢性接触全氟辛烷磺酸期间,饲喂量对海鲈存活率和生物量的影响。研究分两个阶段进行:(1) 对照实验,在考虑到实验室物流的情况下,确定可最大限度提高生物量的最重要饲粮因素;(2) 在接触全氟辛烷磺酸的情况下,应用向下选择的饲粮,以确定毒性参考值。对照优化研究证明,饲喂量和饲喂频率是影响鱼类生物量的重要因素。在随后的全氟辛烷磺酸研究中,每天两次给鱼喂食高剂量或低剂量的鲍鱼,同时暴露于 0.3 至 3.4 毫克/升的全氟辛烷磺酸。喂食高比例蒿鱼的鱼类对全氟辛烷磺酸的摄入量显著增加(p 50 = 2.44 mg/L;低比例 LC50 = 2.25 mg/L)。这些发现有助于更好地了解饲喂量对毒性评估和下游监管决策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feeding Ration Impacts Larval Pimephales Promelas 7-Day Subchronic Growth Endpoint: Case Study with Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid

The larval fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas, 7-day subchronic survival and growth standard toxicity test method is commonly used for research and regulatory testing of effluents and compounds, including emerging contaminants such as Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS). Existing feeding guidelines for testing are described in multiple methods but are open to interpretation. The current study sought to determine the impact of feeding ration on P. promelas survival and biomass during a subchronic exposure to PFOS. The study was conducted in two phases: (1) a control experiment to determine the most significant feeding ration factors that maximize biomass, with consideration to laboratory logistics, and (2) application of down-selected feeding rations in a PFOS exposure to determine toxicity reference values. The control optimization study supported that feeding ration and feeding frequency were significant factors in fish biomass. In the subsequent PFOS study, fish were fed a high or low ration of Artemia twice daily, while exposed to 0.3 to 3.4 mg/L PFOS. Fish fed a high ration of Artemia had significantly (p < 0.05) greater biomass than fish fed a low ration in all exposure concentrations except 3.4 mg/L, where survival was low in both treatments. The feeding ration was not a significant factor on the survival endpoint for either treatment, but the PFOS concentration was (p < 0.0001) (high ration LC50 = 2.44 mg/L; low ration LC50 = 2.25 mg/L). These findings contribute to a better understanding of the impact feeding ration has in toxicity assessments and downstream regulatory decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology provides a place for the publication of timely, detailed, and definitive scientific studies pertaining to the source, transport, fate and / or effects of contaminants in the environment. The journal will consider submissions dealing with new analytical and toxicological techniques that advance our understanding of the source, transport, fate and / or effects of contaminants in the environment. AECT will now consider mini-reviews (where length including references is less than 5,000 words), which highlight case studies, a geographic topic of interest, or a timely subject of debate. AECT will also consider Special Issues on subjects of broad interest. The journal strongly encourages authors to ensure that their submission places a strong emphasis on ecosystem processes; submissions limited to technical aspects of such areas as toxicity testing for single chemicals, wastewater effluent characterization, human occupation exposure, or agricultural phytotoxicity are unlikely to be considered.
期刊最新文献
Determining the Exposure Routes and Risk Assessment of Isocyanates in Indoor Environments. Radionuclides' Dispersion from Coal-Fired Brick Kilns: Geo-Environmental Processes, Potential Risks and Management. Examining Bald Eagle Contaminant Exposure and Reproductive Risk Above and Below Dams on Great Lakes Tributaries. Role of Organic Fertilizer in the Transfer of Lead to Vegetables Produced in Tropical Mountain Agroecosystems. Decoupling Sources of Anthropogenic Influences on Sediments of the Visovac Lake (Krka National Park, Croatia) Using Multiparametric Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1