Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1007/s00244-025-01169-y
Douglas B Sims, Joshua R Monk, Desta Woldetsadik, Andressa C Buch, Amanda C Hudson, Mark C Garner, Joseph Piacentini, Christopher Cohu, Chris S Duvall, Jasmine Krause, Meaghan E Hickey, Matthew Glazewski, Nathan Marshall, Michael Fisher, Paul J Guernsey, Terry Dial, W Geoffrey Spaulding, Duane P Moser
Wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents represent the main source of pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs (PIDs) in river systems in the U.S. Moreover, pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs (PIDs) contamination due to unsheltered homelessness, as is characterized by tents or sleeping bags along rivers and other waterways, could be another pressuring factor, but it has been scarcely studied. This study investigated the occurrence of PIDs in effluent and unsheltered homelessness-impacted sites in river systems in the U.S. In addition, potential ecological risks posed by selected pharmaceuticals to aquatic ecosystems were assessed based on risk quotients (RQs). Analyses were performed using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Several PIDs were found to be ubiquitous in the effluent-impacted sites (e.g. lidocaine, metoprolol tartrate, diclofenac acid and methamphetamine). Results also showed that PIDs contamination is ubiquitous in unsheltered homelessness-impacted sites. For example, the methamphetamine concentrations in Santa Cruz River ranged from 83.5 to 450 ng L-1. Antibiotics (6.94-626 ng L-1) were also detected in higher concentrations in Santa Cruz River. Pharmaceuticals except sulfamethoxazole were detected at concentrations far below Predicted-no effect concentration (PNEC) values across all effluent and unsheltered homelessness-impacted river systems, indicating negligible (low) or moderate ecological risks to algae and crustaceans. However, relying solely on single-compound risk assessment might underestimate cumulative ecological risk.
污水处理厂(WWTP)流出物是美国河流系统中药品和非法药物(PIDs)的主要来源。此外,由于无家可归者(以河流和其他水道的帐篷或睡袋为特征)造成的药品和非法药物(PIDs)污染可能是另一个压力因素,但很少研究。本研究调查了美国河流系统中污水和无庇护的无家可归者影响地点的pid发生情况。此外,基于风险商(RQs)评估了选定药物对水生生态系统构成的潜在生态风险。采用液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)进行分析。在污水影响部位发现了几种PIDs(如利多卡因、酒石酸美托洛尔、双氯芬酸和甲基苯丙胺)。结果还表明,在无庇护的无家可归者影响地区,pid污染普遍存在。例如,圣克鲁斯河中的甲基苯丙胺浓度为83.5至450纳克每升。圣克鲁斯河中抗生素浓度较高(6.94 ~ 626 ng L-1)。除磺胺甲恶唑外,在所有污水和无家可归者影响的河流系统中,检测到的药物浓度远低于预测的无影响浓度(PNEC)值,表明对藻类和甲壳类动物的生态风险可以忽略不计(低)或中等。然而,单纯依赖单一复合风险评估可能会低估累积生态风险。
{"title":"Occurrence and Ecotoxicological Risks of Pharmaceuticals and Illicit Drugs in Effluent and Unsheltered Homelessness-Impacted River Systems.","authors":"Douglas B Sims, Joshua R Monk, Desta Woldetsadik, Andressa C Buch, Amanda C Hudson, Mark C Garner, Joseph Piacentini, Christopher Cohu, Chris S Duvall, Jasmine Krause, Meaghan E Hickey, Matthew Glazewski, Nathan Marshall, Michael Fisher, Paul J Guernsey, Terry Dial, W Geoffrey Spaulding, Duane P Moser","doi":"10.1007/s00244-025-01169-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-025-01169-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents represent the main source of pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs (PIDs) in river systems in the U.S. Moreover, pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs (PIDs) contamination due to unsheltered homelessness, as is characterized by tents or sleeping bags along rivers and other waterways, could be another pressuring factor, but it has been scarcely studied. This study investigated the occurrence of PIDs in effluent and unsheltered homelessness-impacted sites in river systems in the U.S. In addition, potential ecological risks posed by selected pharmaceuticals to aquatic ecosystems were assessed based on risk quotients (RQs). Analyses were performed using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Several PIDs were found to be ubiquitous in the effluent-impacted sites (e.g. lidocaine, metoprolol tartrate, diclofenac acid and methamphetamine). Results also showed that PIDs contamination is ubiquitous in unsheltered homelessness-impacted sites. For example, the methamphetamine concentrations in Santa Cruz River ranged from 83.5 to 450 ng L<sup>-1</sup>. Antibiotics (6.94-626 ng L<sup>-1</sup>) were also detected in higher concentrations in Santa Cruz River. Pharmaceuticals except sulfamethoxazole were detected at concentrations far below Predicted-no effect concentration (PNEC) values across all effluent and unsheltered homelessness-impacted river systems, indicating negligible (low) or moderate ecological risks to algae and crustaceans. However, relying solely on single-compound risk assessment might underestimate cumulative ecological risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":8377,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology","volume":"90 2","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146111698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1007/s00244-025-01173-2
H L Vanderlip, K D Hughes, D M Orihel, V L Friesen, S R de Solla, R J Letcher, P A Martin, R A Lavoie, M L Eng, J F Provencher
Halogenated flame retardants (HFRs) are chemical additives used in many household and commercial products. Due to their persistence, long-range transport, bioaccumulative potential, and toxicity, several HFRs were listed for elimination or restrictions under the international Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (SC-POPs). To understand how levels of HFRs in the environment have changed since being listed under the SC-POPs, herring gull (Larus argentatus) eggs were collected from 17 colonies across Canada (Laurentian Great Lakes, Niagara and St. Lawrence rivers, and Atlantic and Arctic regions) from 2008-2023. Eggs were analyzed for SC-POPs-listed HFRs; total-α-hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD), Σpolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs; sum concentration of 11 tri- to hepta-BDE congeners), BDE-209, and ΣDechlorane Plus (DP; sum concentration of syn- and anti-isomers). Overall, no significant temporal changes in concentrations of the four target classes of HFRs were found for most comparisons across colonies (75%, 51/68). Significant declines were found for 13% of class-colony comparisons while BDE-209 concentrations increased significantly at one colony. Evidence of a significant influence of the SC-POPs on concentrations was equivocal, with 6% of trends declining with the year of nomination, year of listing, or before the year of nomination, and 4% of trends showing increases. Despite more than a decade of regulation for some of these compounds, herring gulls continue to be exposed to HFRs, presumably from sources such as stockpiles, discarded products, or re-release from environmental reservoirs. Continued multi-site monitoring of HFRs is required to fully assess the effectiveness of regulations that may take several decades to show consistent evidence of reduced exposure in gulls.
{"title":"Effect of Stockholm Convention Listing on Temporal Trends of Halogenated Flame Retardants in Herring Gull Eggs in Canada (2008-2023).","authors":"H L Vanderlip, K D Hughes, D M Orihel, V L Friesen, S R de Solla, R J Letcher, P A Martin, R A Lavoie, M L Eng, J F Provencher","doi":"10.1007/s00244-025-01173-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00244-025-01173-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Halogenated flame retardants (HFRs) are chemical additives used in many household and commercial products. Due to their persistence, long-range transport, bioaccumulative potential, and toxicity, several HFRs were listed for elimination or restrictions under the international Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (SC-POPs). To understand how levels of HFRs in the environment have changed since being listed under the SC-POPs, herring gull (Larus argentatus) eggs were collected from 17 colonies across Canada (Laurentian Great Lakes, Niagara and St. Lawrence rivers, and Atlantic and Arctic regions) from 2008-2023. Eggs were analyzed for SC-POPs-listed HFRs; total-α-hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD), Σpolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs; sum concentration of 11 tri- to hepta-BDE congeners), BDE-209, and ΣDechlorane Plus (DP; sum concentration of syn- and anti-isomers). Overall, no significant temporal changes in concentrations of the four target classes of HFRs were found for most comparisons across colonies (75%, 51/68). Significant declines were found for 13% of class-colony comparisons while BDE-209 concentrations increased significantly at one colony. Evidence of a significant influence of the SC-POPs on concentrations was equivocal, with 6% of trends declining with the year of nomination, year of listing, or before the year of nomination, and 4% of trends showing increases. Despite more than a decade of regulation for some of these compounds, herring gulls continue to be exposed to HFRs, presumably from sources such as stockpiles, discarded products, or re-release from environmental reservoirs. Continued multi-site monitoring of HFRs is required to fully assess the effectiveness of regulations that may take several decades to show consistent evidence of reduced exposure in gulls.</p>","PeriodicalId":8377,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology","volume":"90 2","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12864295/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146104004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}