Irene Gélvez-Zúñiga, Fernanda V. Costa, Alberto L. Teixido, Lorena Ashworth, Ramiro Aguilar, G. Wilson Fernandes
{"title":"访花者网络:蜂鸟授粉物种的拮抗剂导致繁殖成功率降低","authors":"Irene Gélvez-Zúñiga, Fernanda V. Costa, Alberto L. Teixido, Lorena Ashworth, Ramiro Aguilar, G. Wilson Fernandes","doi":"10.1111/btp.13342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flower–animal interactions encompass a <i>continuum</i> of mutualistic to antagonistic behaviors. Although the importance of pollinators in interaction networks has been widely reported, the role of floral antagonists remains overlooked. In <i>Collaea cipoensis</i>, an endemic shrub from southeastern Brazil, we modeled an individual-based network assessing the flower visitors' functional behavior and tested if plant centrality increases fitness. Centrality indicates how well-connected a given plant is with the rest of the conspecifics through shared flower visitors. Specifically, we tested if flower visitor interactions are amplified by many-flowered individuals, and whether the relationship between centrality and plant fitness encompasses the effects of mutualists or antagonists. Subsequently, we quantified each visiting species' effectiveness. Antagonistic interactions were the most frequent in the network (97% of visits), primarily conducted by the nectar-robbing bee <i>Trigona spinipes</i> (66%), which was also the most central species and detrimental antagonist. The hummingbirds <i>Colibri serrirostris</i> and <i>Eupatomena macroura</i> were the most efficient pollinators, with a high contribution to the quantity—floral visitation—and the quality—viable seeds—components, respectively. Many-flowered plants showed greater centrality, which boosted the plant's cohesion in the network and increased flower visitation. Accordingly, many-flowered plants were better connected, mainly due to antagonistic visitors. Thus, centrality increases were not positively translated into more reproductive success. Our results reinforce the dynamic scenarios of flower–animal interactions, with consequences to plant reproductive ecology. We highlight the importance of incorporating distinct types of interactions to unveil the complexity of interacting systems, that when not explored, hide potential evolutionary consequences for plant reproductive success.</p><p>Abstract in Portuguese is available with online material.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flower visitor networks: Reduced reproductive success driven by antagonists in a hummingbird-pollinated species\",\"authors\":\"Irene Gélvez-Zúñiga, Fernanda V. Costa, Alberto L. Teixido, Lorena Ashworth, Ramiro Aguilar, G. Wilson Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/btp.13342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Flower–animal interactions encompass a <i>continuum</i> of mutualistic to antagonistic behaviors. Although the importance of pollinators in interaction networks has been widely reported, the role of floral antagonists remains overlooked. In <i>Collaea cipoensis</i>, an endemic shrub from southeastern Brazil, we modeled an individual-based network assessing the flower visitors' functional behavior and tested if plant centrality increases fitness. Centrality indicates how well-connected a given plant is with the rest of the conspecifics through shared flower visitors. Specifically, we tested if flower visitor interactions are amplified by many-flowered individuals, and whether the relationship between centrality and plant fitness encompasses the effects of mutualists or antagonists. Subsequently, we quantified each visiting species' effectiveness. Antagonistic interactions were the most frequent in the network (97% of visits), primarily conducted by the nectar-robbing bee <i>Trigona spinipes</i> (66%), which was also the most central species and detrimental antagonist. The hummingbirds <i>Colibri serrirostris</i> and <i>Eupatomena macroura</i> were the most efficient pollinators, with a high contribution to the quantity—floral visitation—and the quality—viable seeds—components, respectively. Many-flowered plants showed greater centrality, which boosted the plant's cohesion in the network and increased flower visitation. Accordingly, many-flowered plants were better connected, mainly due to antagonistic visitors. Thus, centrality increases were not positively translated into more reproductive success. Our results reinforce the dynamic scenarios of flower–animal interactions, with consequences to plant reproductive ecology. We highlight the importance of incorporating distinct types of interactions to unveil the complexity of interacting systems, that when not explored, hide potential evolutionary consequences for plant reproductive success.</p><p>Abstract in Portuguese is available with online material.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotropica\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotropica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.13342\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.13342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flower visitor networks: Reduced reproductive success driven by antagonists in a hummingbird-pollinated species
Flower–animal interactions encompass a continuum of mutualistic to antagonistic behaviors. Although the importance of pollinators in interaction networks has been widely reported, the role of floral antagonists remains overlooked. In Collaea cipoensis, an endemic shrub from southeastern Brazil, we modeled an individual-based network assessing the flower visitors' functional behavior and tested if plant centrality increases fitness. Centrality indicates how well-connected a given plant is with the rest of the conspecifics through shared flower visitors. Specifically, we tested if flower visitor interactions are amplified by many-flowered individuals, and whether the relationship between centrality and plant fitness encompasses the effects of mutualists or antagonists. Subsequently, we quantified each visiting species' effectiveness. Antagonistic interactions were the most frequent in the network (97% of visits), primarily conducted by the nectar-robbing bee Trigona spinipes (66%), which was also the most central species and detrimental antagonist. The hummingbirds Colibri serrirostris and Eupatomena macroura were the most efficient pollinators, with a high contribution to the quantity—floral visitation—and the quality—viable seeds—components, respectively. Many-flowered plants showed greater centrality, which boosted the plant's cohesion in the network and increased flower visitation. Accordingly, many-flowered plants were better connected, mainly due to antagonistic visitors. Thus, centrality increases were not positively translated into more reproductive success. Our results reinforce the dynamic scenarios of flower–animal interactions, with consequences to plant reproductive ecology. We highlight the importance of incorporating distinct types of interactions to unveil the complexity of interacting systems, that when not explored, hide potential evolutionary consequences for plant reproductive success.
Abstract in Portuguese is available with online material.
期刊介绍:
Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.