EXPRESS:独特性效应:跨国差异如何影响治理决策

IF 5.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Strategic Organization Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1177/14761270241254756
Ilya R. P. Cuypers, G. Ertug, Niels Noorderhaven, K. Kavuşan
{"title":"EXPRESS:独特性效应:跨国差异如何影响治理决策","authors":"Ilya R. P. Cuypers, G. Ertug, Niels Noorderhaven, K. Kavuşan","doi":"10.1177/14761270241254756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transaction cost theory (TCT) is one of the most commonly used theories to explain how firms govern their economic activities. In the context of cross-border collaborations, TCT proposes that dissimilarities between the partners’ home countries, which constitute a key source of behavioral uncertainty, affect how collaborations are governed (i.e., whether firms opt for equity joint ventures or non-equity alliances). Although many firms are likely to face more than one dimension of dissimilarity – for example in terms language and religion, as well as culture – studies in TCT typically focus on how each source of dissimilarity impacts governance choices independently, in isolation. We integrate insights from research on decision-making and social psychology into the logic of TCT to theorize about how multiple dimensions of dissimilarity interactively impact governance choices in collaborative agreements, such that the influence of a given level of dissimilarity is not independent of the level of dissimilarity in other dimensions. Specifically, we propose that the impact of dissimilarity on a given dimension on these governance choices will be lower, i.e. negatively moderated, when dissimilarities on other dimensions are higher. For example, a given level of cultural distance will have a greater impact on governance choice when linguistic distance is low (because cultural distance becomes more distinctive) as compared to a case when linguistic distance is not low. Our analysis of 21,951 cross-border non-equity alliances and equity joint ventures yields support for our predictions.","PeriodicalId":22087,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: The Distinctiveness Effect: How Cross-Country Dissimilarities Influence Governance Decisions\",\"authors\":\"Ilya R. P. Cuypers, G. Ertug, Niels Noorderhaven, K. Kavuşan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14761270241254756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Transaction cost theory (TCT) is one of the most commonly used theories to explain how firms govern their economic activities. In the context of cross-border collaborations, TCT proposes that dissimilarities between the partners’ home countries, which constitute a key source of behavioral uncertainty, affect how collaborations are governed (i.e., whether firms opt for equity joint ventures or non-equity alliances). Although many firms are likely to face more than one dimension of dissimilarity – for example in terms language and religion, as well as culture – studies in TCT typically focus on how each source of dissimilarity impacts governance choices independently, in isolation. We integrate insights from research on decision-making and social psychology into the logic of TCT to theorize about how multiple dimensions of dissimilarity interactively impact governance choices in collaborative agreements, such that the influence of a given level of dissimilarity is not independent of the level of dissimilarity in other dimensions. Specifically, we propose that the impact of dissimilarity on a given dimension on these governance choices will be lower, i.e. negatively moderated, when dissimilarities on other dimensions are higher. For example, a given level of cultural distance will have a greater impact on governance choice when linguistic distance is low (because cultural distance becomes more distinctive) as compared to a case when linguistic distance is not low. Our analysis of 21,951 cross-border non-equity alliances and equity joint ventures yields support for our predictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Organization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270241254756\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270241254756","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交易成本理论(TCT)是解释企业如何管理其经济活动的最常用理论之一。就跨国合作而言,交易成本理论认为,合作伙伴母国之间的差异是行为不确定性的主要来源,会影响合作的管理方式(即企业是选择股权合资企业还是非股权联盟)。尽管许多企业可能面临不止一个维度的差异--例如在语言和宗教以及文化方面--但TCT的研究通常集中于每种差异来源如何独立、孤立地影响治理选择。我们将决策和社会心理学研究的见解与 TCT 的逻辑相结合,从理论上探讨多个维度的差异如何交互影响合作协议中的治理选择,从而使特定差异水平的影响与其他维度的差异水平无关。具体来说,我们认为,当其他维度的差异程度较高时,某一维度的差异对这些治理选择的影响会较低,即负调节作用。例如,与语言距离并不低的情况相比,当语言距离较低时(因为文化距离变得更加独特),给定水平的文化距离对治理选择的影响会更大。我们对 21951 家跨国非股权联盟和股权合资企业的分析支持了我们的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS: The Distinctiveness Effect: How Cross-Country Dissimilarities Influence Governance Decisions
Transaction cost theory (TCT) is one of the most commonly used theories to explain how firms govern their economic activities. In the context of cross-border collaborations, TCT proposes that dissimilarities between the partners’ home countries, which constitute a key source of behavioral uncertainty, affect how collaborations are governed (i.e., whether firms opt for equity joint ventures or non-equity alliances). Although many firms are likely to face more than one dimension of dissimilarity – for example in terms language and religion, as well as culture – studies in TCT typically focus on how each source of dissimilarity impacts governance choices independently, in isolation. We integrate insights from research on decision-making and social psychology into the logic of TCT to theorize about how multiple dimensions of dissimilarity interactively impact governance choices in collaborative agreements, such that the influence of a given level of dissimilarity is not independent of the level of dissimilarity in other dimensions. Specifically, we propose that the impact of dissimilarity on a given dimension on these governance choices will be lower, i.e. negatively moderated, when dissimilarities on other dimensions are higher. For example, a given level of cultural distance will have a greater impact on governance choice when linguistic distance is low (because cultural distance becomes more distinctive) as compared to a case when linguistic distance is not low. Our analysis of 21,951 cross-border non-equity alliances and equity joint ventures yields support for our predictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.20%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Strategic Organization is devoted to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed, discipline-grounded conceptual and empirical research of interest to researchers, teachers, students, and practitioners of strategic management and organization. The journal also aims to be of considerable interest to senior managers in government, industry, and particularly the growing management consulting industry. Strategic Organization provides an international, interdisciplinary forum designed to improve our understanding of the interrelated dynamics of strategic and organizational processes and outcomes.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Researchers convening dialogue to address grand challenges: Affordances, tensions, and the shift to deep dialogue EXPRESS: From Seller to Broker: When and How Issue Sellers Engage with External Stakeholders to Sell Issues Inside Organizations EXPRESS: Reflections on Deep Academic-Practitioner Partnering for Generative Societal Impact EXPRESS: Communities for impact: Empowering early-career researchers in the pursuit of impact EXPRESS: The increasing value of status in low-performing organizations: Evidence from the video game industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1