识别可预测成功戒烟的戒烟应用程序功能使用模式:利用机器学习对实验数据进行二次分析

JMIR AI Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.2196/51756
L. N. Siegel, Kara P Wiseman, Alexandra Budenz, Yvonne M Prutzman
{"title":"识别可预测成功戒烟的戒烟应用程序功能使用模式:利用机器学习对实验数据进行二次分析","authors":"L. N. Siegel, Kara P Wiseman, Alexandra Budenz, Yvonne M Prutzman","doi":"10.2196/51756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Leveraging free smartphone apps can help expand the availability and use of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions. However, there is a need for additional research investigating how the use of different features within such apps impacts their effectiveness.\n \n \n \n We used observational data collected from an experiment of a publicly available smoking cessation app to develop supervised machine learning (SML) algorithms intended to distinguish the app features that promote successful smoking cessation. We then assessed the extent to which patterns of app feature use accounted for variance in cessation that could not be explained by other known predictors of cessation (eg, tobacco use behaviors).\n \n \n \n Data came from an experiment (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623736) testing the impacts of incentivizing ecological momentary assessments within the National Cancer Institute’s quitSTART app. Participants’ (N=133) app activity, including every action they took within the app and its corresponding time stamp, was recorded. Demographic and baseline tobacco use characteristics were measured at the start of the experiment, and short-term smoking cessation (7-day point prevalence abstinence) was measured at 4 weeks after baseline. Logistic regression SML modeling was used to estimate participants’ probability of cessation from 28 variables reflecting participants’ use of different app features, assigned experimental conditions, and phone type (iPhone [Apple Inc] or Android [Google]). The SML model was first fit in a training set (n=100) and then its accuracy was assessed in a held-aside test set (n=33). Within the test set, a likelihood ratio test (n=30) assessed whether adding individuals’ SML-predicted probabilities of cessation to a logistic regression model that included demographic and tobacco use (eg, polyuse) variables explained additional variance in 4-week cessation.\n \n \n \n The SML model’s sensitivity (0.67) and specificity (0.67) in the held-aside test set indicated that individuals’ patterns of using different app features predicted cessation with reasonable accuracy. The likelihood ratio test showed that the logistic regression, which included the SML model–predicted probabilities, was statistically equivalent to the model that only included the demographic and tobacco use variables (P=.16).\n \n \n \n Harnessing user data through SML could help determine the features of smoking cessation apps that are most useful. This methodological approach could be applied in future research focusing on smoking cessation app features to inform the development and improvement of smoking cessation apps.\n \n \n \n ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623736; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04623736\n","PeriodicalId":73551,"journal":{"name":"JMIR AI","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Patterns of Smoking Cessation App Feature Use That Predict Successful Quitting: Secondary Analysis of Experimental Data Leveraging Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"L. N. Siegel, Kara P Wiseman, Alexandra Budenz, Yvonne M Prutzman\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/51756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Leveraging free smartphone apps can help expand the availability and use of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions. However, there is a need for additional research investigating how the use of different features within such apps impacts their effectiveness.\\n \\n \\n \\n We used observational data collected from an experiment of a publicly available smoking cessation app to develop supervised machine learning (SML) algorithms intended to distinguish the app features that promote successful smoking cessation. We then assessed the extent to which patterns of app feature use accounted for variance in cessation that could not be explained by other known predictors of cessation (eg, tobacco use behaviors).\\n \\n \\n \\n Data came from an experiment (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623736) testing the impacts of incentivizing ecological momentary assessments within the National Cancer Institute’s quitSTART app. Participants’ (N=133) app activity, including every action they took within the app and its corresponding time stamp, was recorded. Demographic and baseline tobacco use characteristics were measured at the start of the experiment, and short-term smoking cessation (7-day point prevalence abstinence) was measured at 4 weeks after baseline. Logistic regression SML modeling was used to estimate participants’ probability of cessation from 28 variables reflecting participants’ use of different app features, assigned experimental conditions, and phone type (iPhone [Apple Inc] or Android [Google]). The SML model was first fit in a training set (n=100) and then its accuracy was assessed in a held-aside test set (n=33). Within the test set, a likelihood ratio test (n=30) assessed whether adding individuals’ SML-predicted probabilities of cessation to a logistic regression model that included demographic and tobacco use (eg, polyuse) variables explained additional variance in 4-week cessation.\\n \\n \\n \\n The SML model’s sensitivity (0.67) and specificity (0.67) in the held-aside test set indicated that individuals’ patterns of using different app features predicted cessation with reasonable accuracy. The likelihood ratio test showed that the logistic regression, which included the SML model–predicted probabilities, was statistically equivalent to the model that only included the demographic and tobacco use variables (P=.16).\\n \\n \\n \\n Harnessing user data through SML could help determine the features of smoking cessation apps that are most useful. This methodological approach could be applied in future research focusing on smoking cessation app features to inform the development and improvement of smoking cessation apps.\\n \\n \\n \\n ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623736; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04623736\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":73551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR AI\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR AI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/51756\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/51756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用免费的智能手机应用程序有助于扩大循证戒烟干预措施的可用性和使用范围。然而,还需要进行更多的研究,调查此类应用程序中不同功能的使用如何影响其有效性。 我们利用从一个公开的戒烟应用程序实验中收集到的观察数据,开发了有监督的机器学习(SML)算法,旨在区分促进成功戒烟的应用程序功能。然后,我们评估了应用程序功能使用模式在多大程度上解释了其他已知戒烟预测因素(如烟草使用行为)无法解释的戒烟差异。 数据来自一项实验(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623736),该实验测试了在美国国家癌症研究所的戒烟应用程序(quitSTART)中对生态瞬间评估进行激励的影响。参与者(人数=133)的应用活动,包括他们在应用中的每一次操作及其相应的时间戳都被记录下来。在实验开始时测量人口统计学特征和基线烟草使用特征,在基线后 4 周测量短期戒烟情况(7 天点戒烟率)。使用逻辑回归 SML 模型从 28 个变量中估计参与者的戒烟概率,这些变量反映了参与者对不同应用功能的使用情况、指定的实验条件和手机类型(iPhone [Apple Inc] 或 Android [Google])。SML 模型首先在训练集(人数=100)中进行拟合,然后在保留测试集(人数=33)中评估其准确性。在测试集中,似然比测试(n=30)评估了将个人的 SML 预测戒烟概率添加到包含人口统计学和烟草使用(如多用)变量的逻辑回归模型中是否能解释 4 周戒烟率的额外差异。 SML模型在保留边测试集中的灵敏度(0.67)和特异度(0.67)表明,个人使用不同应用功能的模式可以合理准确地预测戒烟情况。似然比检验表明,包含 SML 模型预测概率的逻辑回归与仅包含人口统计学变量和烟草使用变量的模型在统计学上是等效的(P=0.16)。 通过 SML 掌握用户数据有助于确定戒烟应用程序中最有用的功能。这种方法可应用于未来以戒烟应用程序功能为重点的研究中,为戒烟应用程序的开发和改进提供参考。 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623736; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04623736
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying Patterns of Smoking Cessation App Feature Use That Predict Successful Quitting: Secondary Analysis of Experimental Data Leveraging Machine Learning
Leveraging free smartphone apps can help expand the availability and use of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions. However, there is a need for additional research investigating how the use of different features within such apps impacts their effectiveness. We used observational data collected from an experiment of a publicly available smoking cessation app to develop supervised machine learning (SML) algorithms intended to distinguish the app features that promote successful smoking cessation. We then assessed the extent to which patterns of app feature use accounted for variance in cessation that could not be explained by other known predictors of cessation (eg, tobacco use behaviors). Data came from an experiment (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623736) testing the impacts of incentivizing ecological momentary assessments within the National Cancer Institute’s quitSTART app. Participants’ (N=133) app activity, including every action they took within the app and its corresponding time stamp, was recorded. Demographic and baseline tobacco use characteristics were measured at the start of the experiment, and short-term smoking cessation (7-day point prevalence abstinence) was measured at 4 weeks after baseline. Logistic regression SML modeling was used to estimate participants’ probability of cessation from 28 variables reflecting participants’ use of different app features, assigned experimental conditions, and phone type (iPhone [Apple Inc] or Android [Google]). The SML model was first fit in a training set (n=100) and then its accuracy was assessed in a held-aside test set (n=33). Within the test set, a likelihood ratio test (n=30) assessed whether adding individuals’ SML-predicted probabilities of cessation to a logistic regression model that included demographic and tobacco use (eg, polyuse) variables explained additional variance in 4-week cessation. The SML model’s sensitivity (0.67) and specificity (0.67) in the held-aside test set indicated that individuals’ patterns of using different app features predicted cessation with reasonable accuracy. The likelihood ratio test showed that the logistic regression, which included the SML model–predicted probabilities, was statistically equivalent to the model that only included the demographic and tobacco use variables (P=.16). Harnessing user data through SML could help determine the features of smoking cessation apps that are most useful. This methodological approach could be applied in future research focusing on smoking cessation app features to inform the development and improvement of smoking cessation apps. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623736; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04623736
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ensuring Appropriate Representation in Artificial Intelligence-Generated Medical Imagery: Protocol for a Methodological Approach to Address Skin Tone Bias. How Explainable Artificial Intelligence Can Increase or Decrease Clinicians' Trust in AI Applications in Health Care: Systematic Review. Targeting COVID-19 and Human Resources for Health News Information Extraction: Algorithm Development and Validation. Understanding AI's Role in Endometriosis Patient Education and Evaluating Its Information and Accuracy: Systematic Review. Identifying Marijuana Use Behaviors Among Youth Experiencing Homelessness Using a Machine Learning-Based Framework: Development and Evaluation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1