尤利西斯》和《奥德赛》中的时间与身份》,斯蒂芬妮-尼尔森著(评论)

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1353/jjq.2023.a927928
Stephen Sicari
{"title":"尤利西斯》和《奥德赛》中的时间与身份》,斯蒂芬妮-尼尔森著(评论)","authors":"Stephen Sicari","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2023.a927928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Time and Identity in \"Ulysses\" and the \"Odyssey,\"</em> by Stephanie Nelson <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Stephen Sicari (bio) </li> </ul> <em>TIME AND IDENTITY IN \"ULYSSES\" AND THE \"ODYSSEY,\"</em> by Stephanie Nelson. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2022. xii + 282 pp. $85.00 cloth. <p>When I read in the introduction to Stephanie Nelson's <em>Time and Identity in \"Ulysses\" and the \"Odyssey\"</em> that \"there has been no full-length study of the two together\" (2), I admit I was surprised. Surely Joyce scholars have been pursuing the relation of the two works even before a copy of <em>Ulysses</em> was printed for Joyce's fortieth birthday. Upon reflection, I realized that Nelson's assertion may in fact be true, especially when she explains that she does not seek anything new to say about the Homeric correspondences (in fact, she rightly calls them \"Joyce's superficial play with Homer\"—2), but pursues different ends: \"This book, then, compares two works concerned with similar themes\" (3). Putting the two together in a \"full-length study\" is, for Nelson, not the usual one-way street of using Homer to explain Joyce; rather, they illuminate one another: \"Just as the <em>Odyssey</em> helps us think through <em>Ulysses</em>, so <em>Ulysses</em> brings out aspects of the <em>Odyssey</em> that many layers of interpretive varnish have obscured\" (3). She wants to bring to light what she calls \"the complex of associations that the <em>Odyssey</em> and <em>Ulysses</em> share\" (106). It takes until page 151 for her to say this clearly: \"[T]he <em>Odyssey</em> does not provide a key that unlocks <em>Ulysses</em>. Rather, it points us to where the issues lie, as does <em>Ulysses</em> for the <em>Odyssey</em>.\"</p> <p>Nelson indeed identifies many such issues and associations in her study. While her title states that \"Time and Identity\" are her main emphases, within any one chapter (which she more or less organizes according to correspondences between characters in the two texts), one will find many sub-themes. For instance, in chapter 1, one finds: \"Homer's Kinds of Time: Mythic and Ordinary,\" \"Joyce's Kinds of Time: Internal and External,\" \"Fluid and Fixed Identities,\" and \"The Epic Tradition and the Use of Time.\" Within these sections are subsections, and at times the sheer array of such associations and issues can feel overwhelming. This is a list of some of the other themes: from chapter 2, \"Problems with Property,\" \"Problems with Family,\" and \"The Displaced Son\"; from chapter 3, \"Names and Identities\" and \"The Role of Storytelling\"; and from chapter 4, \"The Passive Hero,\" <strong>[End Page 174]</strong> \"Deeds and Imposing Identity,\" and \"The Place of War and the Open-ended.\" The remaining two chapters also have several such headings with sub-sections. This list is intended to provide a sense of the array of associations and issues to be encountered.</p> <p>My overall impression is that the author is more successful in using <em>Ulysses</em> to think about the <em>Odyssey</em> than the other way around. Nelson is a Classics scholar (her previous scholarship includes a book on Hesiod and Vergil and another on Aristophanes<sup>1</sup>) who brings that formidable body of knowledge to this study. Not being a Classics scholar myself, I found what she has to say about the <em>Odyssey</em> provocative and new (new to me, at least). And if this is how she came to her insights about the various themes she discusses, then her placing them next to one another is at least a partial success. My own sense of the <em>Odyssey</em> has certainly been enlarged and enhanced.</p> <p>Dedicated readers of <em>Ulysses</em> might find her persistent emphasis on the family dynamics in the <em>Odyssey</em> illuminating in themselves and provocative in thinking about the family situations of both Bloom and Stephen. Perhaps it was her reading of Joyce that led her to describe the <em>Odyssey</em> as quite modern, if not modernist. Nelson presents the relationship between Penelope and Telemachus as more tense and complicated than I had assumed. In her handling, Penelope has to keep Telemachus a dependent child if she is to be able to avoid ceding him the authority to oversee the household, which would free her to marry, which she may or may not actually desire. When Nelson says, \"For Telemachus [waiting for Odysseus's return] means...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":42413,"journal":{"name":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time and Identity in \\\"Ulysses\\\" and the \\\"Odyssey,\\\" by Stephanie Nelson (review)\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Sicari\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jjq.2023.a927928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Time and Identity in \\\"Ulysses\\\" and the \\\"Odyssey,\\\"</em> by Stephanie Nelson <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Stephen Sicari (bio) </li> </ul> <em>TIME AND IDENTITY IN \\\"ULYSSES\\\" AND THE \\\"ODYSSEY,\\\"</em> by Stephanie Nelson. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2022. xii + 282 pp. $85.00 cloth. <p>When I read in the introduction to Stephanie Nelson's <em>Time and Identity in \\\"Ulysses\\\" and the \\\"Odyssey\\\"</em> that \\\"there has been no full-length study of the two together\\\" (2), I admit I was surprised. Surely Joyce scholars have been pursuing the relation of the two works even before a copy of <em>Ulysses</em> was printed for Joyce's fortieth birthday. Upon reflection, I realized that Nelson's assertion may in fact be true, especially when she explains that she does not seek anything new to say about the Homeric correspondences (in fact, she rightly calls them \\\"Joyce's superficial play with Homer\\\"—2), but pursues different ends: \\\"This book, then, compares two works concerned with similar themes\\\" (3). Putting the two together in a \\\"full-length study\\\" is, for Nelson, not the usual one-way street of using Homer to explain Joyce; rather, they illuminate one another: \\\"Just as the <em>Odyssey</em> helps us think through <em>Ulysses</em>, so <em>Ulysses</em> brings out aspects of the <em>Odyssey</em> that many layers of interpretive varnish have obscured\\\" (3). She wants to bring to light what she calls \\\"the complex of associations that the <em>Odyssey</em> and <em>Ulysses</em> share\\\" (106). It takes until page 151 for her to say this clearly: \\\"[T]he <em>Odyssey</em> does not provide a key that unlocks <em>Ulysses</em>. Rather, it points us to where the issues lie, as does <em>Ulysses</em> for the <em>Odyssey</em>.\\\"</p> <p>Nelson indeed identifies many such issues and associations in her study. While her title states that \\\"Time and Identity\\\" are her main emphases, within any one chapter (which she more or less organizes according to correspondences between characters in the two texts), one will find many sub-themes. For instance, in chapter 1, one finds: \\\"Homer's Kinds of Time: Mythic and Ordinary,\\\" \\\"Joyce's Kinds of Time: Internal and External,\\\" \\\"Fluid and Fixed Identities,\\\" and \\\"The Epic Tradition and the Use of Time.\\\" Within these sections are subsections, and at times the sheer array of such associations and issues can feel overwhelming. This is a list of some of the other themes: from chapter 2, \\\"Problems with Property,\\\" \\\"Problems with Family,\\\" and \\\"The Displaced Son\\\"; from chapter 3, \\\"Names and Identities\\\" and \\\"The Role of Storytelling\\\"; and from chapter 4, \\\"The Passive Hero,\\\" <strong>[End Page 174]</strong> \\\"Deeds and Imposing Identity,\\\" and \\\"The Place of War and the Open-ended.\\\" The remaining two chapters also have several such headings with sub-sections. This list is intended to provide a sense of the array of associations and issues to be encountered.</p> <p>My overall impression is that the author is more successful in using <em>Ulysses</em> to think about the <em>Odyssey</em> than the other way around. Nelson is a Classics scholar (her previous scholarship includes a book on Hesiod and Vergil and another on Aristophanes<sup>1</sup>) who brings that formidable body of knowledge to this study. Not being a Classics scholar myself, I found what she has to say about the <em>Odyssey</em> provocative and new (new to me, at least). And if this is how she came to her insights about the various themes she discusses, then her placing them next to one another is at least a partial success. My own sense of the <em>Odyssey</em> has certainly been enlarged and enhanced.</p> <p>Dedicated readers of <em>Ulysses</em> might find her persistent emphasis on the family dynamics in the <em>Odyssey</em> illuminating in themselves and provocative in thinking about the family situations of both Bloom and Stephen. Perhaps it was her reading of Joyce that led her to describe the <em>Odyssey</em> as quite modern, if not modernist. Nelson presents the relationship between Penelope and Telemachus as more tense and complicated than I had assumed. In her handling, Penelope has to keep Telemachus a dependent child if she is to be able to avoid ceding him the authority to oversee the household, which would free her to marry, which she may or may not actually desire. When Nelson says, \\\"For Telemachus [waiting for Odysseus's return] means...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2023.a927928\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2023.a927928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 尤利西斯》和《奥德赛》中的时间与身份》,斯蒂芬妮-尼尔森著 斯蒂芬-西卡里(简历) 《尤利西斯》和《奥德赛》中的时间与身份》,斯蒂芬妮-尼尔森著。盖恩斯维尔:佛罗里达大学出版社,2022 年。xii + 282 pp.布版售价 85.00 美元。当我在斯蒂芬妮-尼尔森的《"尤利西斯 "和 "奥德赛 "中的时间与身份》一书的导言中读到 "还没有对这两部作品进行过全面的研究"(2)时,我承认我很惊讶。当然,早在《尤利西斯》为乔伊斯四十岁生日印刷之前,乔伊斯的学者们就已经在研究这两部作品的关系了。经过反思,我意识到尼尔森的论断事实上可能是正确的,尤其是当她解释说她并没有寻求关于荷马史诗对应关系的新东西时(事实上,她正确地称其为 "乔伊斯与荷马的肤浅游戏"-2),而是追求不同的目的:"本书比较了两部主题相似的作品"(3)。在尼尔森看来,将这两部作品放在一起进行 "长篇研究",并不是常见的用荷马来解释乔伊斯的单行道;相反,它们可以相互照亮:"正如《奥德赛》帮助我们思考《尤利西斯》一样,《尤利西斯》也揭示了《奥德赛》中被多层诠释漆遮蔽的一面"(3)。她希望揭示她所谓的"《奥德赛》和《尤利西斯》共有的复杂关联"(106)。直到第 151 页,她才清楚地表达了这一点:"奥德赛并没有提供打开《尤利西斯》的钥匙。相反,它为我们指出了问题所在,正如《尤利西斯》之于《奥德赛》。尼尔森在她的研究中确实发现了许多这样的问题和关联。虽然她在标题中指出 "时间与身份 "是她的主要重点,但在任何一章中(她或多或少是根据两个文本中人物之间的对应关系来组织的),我们都会发现许多次主题。例如,在第一章中,我们会发现"荷马的时间类型:神话与普通"、"乔伊斯的时间类型:内部与外部"、"流动与固定的身份 "以及 "史诗传统与时间的使用"。在这些部分中又有一些小节,有时这些联想和问题会让人感到应接不暇。这里列举的是其他一些主题:第二章中的 "财产问题"、"家庭问题 "和 "流离失所的儿子";第三章中的 "名字与身份 "和 "讲故事的作用";第四章中的 "被动的英雄"、[尾页 174]"契约与强加的身份 "和 "战争的地位与开放性"。其余两章也有几个这样的标题和小节。列出这些标题的目的是为了让读者了解所遇到的一系列关联和问题。我的总体印象是,作者利用《尤利西斯》来思考《奥德赛》比反过来思考《奥德赛》更为成功。尼尔森是一位古典学者(她以前的学术著作包括一本关于赫西俄德和维吉尔的书,以及另一本关于阿里斯托芬的书1),她将这一强大的知识体系带到了这项研究中。我本人不是古典学者,但我发现她关于《奥德赛》的论述具有启发性和新颖性(至少对我来说是新颖的)。如果这就是她对她所讨论的各种主题的见解,那么她将这些主题放在一起至少是部分成功。我对《奥德赛》的理解无疑得到了扩展和提升。专注于《尤利西斯》的读者可能会发现,她一直强调《奥德赛》中的家庭动态,这本身就很有启发性,对布鲁姆和斯蒂芬的家庭状况也很有启发。也许正是因为她对乔伊斯的阅读,才让她将奥德赛描述得相当现代,甚至可以说是现代主义。尼尔森将珀涅罗珀和忒勒马科斯之间的关系表现得比我想象的更加紧张和复杂。在她的处理方式中,珀涅罗珀必须让忒勒马科斯成为一个受人抚养的孩子,这样她才能避免让忒勒马科斯掌管家务,从而使她能够自由地结婚,而她实际上可能希望结婚,也可能不希望结婚。当纳尔逊说:"对于忒勒马科斯来说,[等待奥德修斯的归来]意味着...... "时,珀涅罗珀就已经知道了忒勒马科斯的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time and Identity in "Ulysses" and the "Odyssey," by Stephanie Nelson (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Time and Identity in "Ulysses" and the "Odyssey," by Stephanie Nelson
  • Stephen Sicari (bio)
TIME AND IDENTITY IN "ULYSSES" AND THE "ODYSSEY," by Stephanie Nelson. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2022. xii + 282 pp. $85.00 cloth.

When I read in the introduction to Stephanie Nelson's Time and Identity in "Ulysses" and the "Odyssey" that "there has been no full-length study of the two together" (2), I admit I was surprised. Surely Joyce scholars have been pursuing the relation of the two works even before a copy of Ulysses was printed for Joyce's fortieth birthday. Upon reflection, I realized that Nelson's assertion may in fact be true, especially when she explains that she does not seek anything new to say about the Homeric correspondences (in fact, she rightly calls them "Joyce's superficial play with Homer"—2), but pursues different ends: "This book, then, compares two works concerned with similar themes" (3). Putting the two together in a "full-length study" is, for Nelson, not the usual one-way street of using Homer to explain Joyce; rather, they illuminate one another: "Just as the Odyssey helps us think through Ulysses, so Ulysses brings out aspects of the Odyssey that many layers of interpretive varnish have obscured" (3). She wants to bring to light what she calls "the complex of associations that the Odyssey and Ulysses share" (106). It takes until page 151 for her to say this clearly: "[T]he Odyssey does not provide a key that unlocks Ulysses. Rather, it points us to where the issues lie, as does Ulysses for the Odyssey."

Nelson indeed identifies many such issues and associations in her study. While her title states that "Time and Identity" are her main emphases, within any one chapter (which she more or less organizes according to correspondences between characters in the two texts), one will find many sub-themes. For instance, in chapter 1, one finds: "Homer's Kinds of Time: Mythic and Ordinary," "Joyce's Kinds of Time: Internal and External," "Fluid and Fixed Identities," and "The Epic Tradition and the Use of Time." Within these sections are subsections, and at times the sheer array of such associations and issues can feel overwhelming. This is a list of some of the other themes: from chapter 2, "Problems with Property," "Problems with Family," and "The Displaced Son"; from chapter 3, "Names and Identities" and "The Role of Storytelling"; and from chapter 4, "The Passive Hero," [End Page 174] "Deeds and Imposing Identity," and "The Place of War and the Open-ended." The remaining two chapters also have several such headings with sub-sections. This list is intended to provide a sense of the array of associations and issues to be encountered.

My overall impression is that the author is more successful in using Ulysses to think about the Odyssey than the other way around. Nelson is a Classics scholar (her previous scholarship includes a book on Hesiod and Vergil and another on Aristophanes1) who brings that formidable body of knowledge to this study. Not being a Classics scholar myself, I found what she has to say about the Odyssey provocative and new (new to me, at least). And if this is how she came to her insights about the various themes she discusses, then her placing them next to one another is at least a partial success. My own sense of the Odyssey has certainly been enlarged and enhanced.

Dedicated readers of Ulysses might find her persistent emphasis on the family dynamics in the Odyssey illuminating in themselves and provocative in thinking about the family situations of both Bloom and Stephen. Perhaps it was her reading of Joyce that led her to describe the Odyssey as quite modern, if not modernist. Nelson presents the relationship between Penelope and Telemachus as more tense and complicated than I had assumed. In her handling, Penelope has to keep Telemachus a dependent child if she is to be able to avoid ceding him the authority to oversee the household, which would free her to marry, which she may or may not actually desire. When Nelson says, "For Telemachus [waiting for Odysseus's return] means...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963 at the University of Tulsa by Thomas F. Staley, the James Joyce Quarterly has been the flagship journal of international Joyce studies ever since. In each issue, the JJQ brings together a wide array of critical and theoretical work focusing on the life, writing, and reception of James Joyce. We encourage submissions of all types, welcoming archival, historical, biographical, and critical research. Each issue of the JJQ provides a selection of peer-reviewed essays representing the very best in contemporary Joyce scholarship. In addition, the journal publishes notes, reviews, letters, a comprehensive checklist of recent Joyce-related publications, and the editor"s "Raising the Wind" comments.
期刊最新文献
Calling Forth the Future: Joyce and the Messianism of Absence Ulysses "seen" Introducing Robert Berry's "Aeolus" A Cold Case of Irish Facts: Re(:)visiting John Stanislaus Joyce Stepping Through Origins: Nature, Home, & Landscape in Irish Literature by Jefferson Holdridge (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1