Colorectal cancer prevention in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries: a review of policy approaches.

Purpose: This study aims to examine the availability and comprehensiveness of policies pertaining to colorectal cancer (CRC) in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries, as it is a major public health concern in these regions and the second most common cause of cancer deaths among women.

Design/methodology/approach: We performed a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology, searching for publicly available policy documents from 18 countries. We described the prevention methods and activities in each country based on the World Health Organization guidelines for CRC screening.

Findings: Our research found that most countries had at least five policies related to CRC prevention, which most commonly included primary, secondary and tertiary prevention measures. Elements such as promoting healthy lifestyle choices and implementing screening methods such as fecal occult blood tests, fecal immunochemical tests or colonoscopy were frequently mentioned in these policies. However, target age ranges varied among countries. Our analysis revealed a pressing need to increase the availability and utilization of CRC screening in these countries.

Research limitations/implications: One of the main limitations of this study is that it is a desk review conducted using internet-based resources, which may have missed important sources or recent policy documents that are not yet available online. Despite our efforts to include all relevant policies, it is possible that we overlooked other policies that contain relevant information, such as those that cover cancer treatment methods. Additionally, our search excluded primary healthcare and universal healthcare coverage policies, which could include important information on CRC prevention and control activities. Additionally, as a scoping review approach was used, no critical assessment of the included studies or literature was conducted. Furthermore, due to the limited number of countries included, the comparability of the findings is limited. In future research, it would be beneficial to expand the study and collect new data from decision-makers and stakeholders to further investigate these hypotheses. It is also important to note that the presence of a policy document is not the end goal, as it is simply a step toward better outcomes.

Practical implications: In summary, our research highlights the need for improved and unified efforts toward preventing and detecting CRC in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries. This knowledge can be used to focus efforts on developing a standardized policy document and national screening program that can be adapted to meet the unique needs of each country. The importance of CRC screening, regardless of need, must be emphasized in order to aid in the transition from curative to preventive cancer care. Our study highlights the need for more detailed and science-based policies for CRC prevention and screening in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries. While many countries have policies in place, they often lack key components and do not fully reflect current evidence-based guidelines. To improve population health outcomes, further research is needed to understand the implementation and enforcement of these policies as well as their impact on cancer incidence and survival. As the screening landscape evolves, countries may learn from each other and a better understanding of the complex policy frameworks that impact CRC screening is needed so that countries can update and tailor policy documents to their specific situations.

Social implications: In conclusion, policymakers in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries have implemented various policy approaches to prevent and control the CRC. The effectiveness of these approaches varies across countries and depends on several factors, including the availability of resources, the level of public awareness and the political will to implement effective policies. Further research is needed to determine the most effective policy approaches for CRC prevention in these regions and to ensure that the right policies are in place to reduce the incidence and impact of this disease.

Originality/value: The study aimed to identify gaps in existing research and areas for future work by mapping, categorizing and organizing existing evidence on CRC policies in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries. Additional research is necessary to understand the implementation and enforcement of these policies and how they impact health outcomes such as cancer incidence and survival.

Highlights: CRC policy is heterogeneous in Central and Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus region.There are particularly important differences regarding the implementation of CRC screening.Cancer screening and palliative care approaches were less frequently included.Variations exist in the comprehensiveness of policy by prevention level and country.