在澳大利亚,改变食品和饮料产品的采购方式可减少温室气体排放

IF 23.6 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Nature food Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1038/s43016-024-00971-6
Allison Gaines, Maria Shahid, Daisy Coyle, Eden Barrett, Michalis Hadjikakou, Jason H. Y. Wu, Fraser Taylor, Simone Pettigrew, Bruce Neal, Paraskevi Seferidi
{"title":"在澳大利亚,改变食品和饮料产品的采购方式可减少温室气体排放","authors":"Allison Gaines, Maria Shahid, Daisy Coyle, Eden Barrett, Michalis Hadjikakou, Jason H. Y. Wu, Fraser Taylor, Simone Pettigrew, Bruce Neal, Paraskevi Seferidi","doi":"10.1038/s43016-024-00971-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Switching between similar food and beverage products may reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe). Here, using consumer data linked to 23,550 product-specific GHGe values, we estimated annual GHGe attributable to product purchases consumed at home in Australia and calculated reductions from specific switches. Potential changes to mean Health Star Rating, mean energy density and the proportion of ultraprocessed foods purchased were assessed. Approximately 31 million tonnes of GHGe were attributable to products consumed at home in 2019, the three highest contributors of GHGe being ‘meat and meat products’ (49%), ‘dairy’ (17%) and ‘non-alcoholic beverages’ (16%). Switching higher-emission products for ‘very similar’ lower-emission products could reduce total emissions by 26%. Switches to ‘less similar’ lower-emission products could lead to a 71% reduction. Switches had little impact on the average Health Star Rating, energy density of purchases and proportion of ultraprocessed foods purchased. Directing manufacturing and marketing towards lower-environmental-impact products and signposting such options to consumers are key. One strategy to reduce the ecological footprint of food systems is to replace higher-emissions food products with lower-emissions alternatives. This study estimates the potential impact of product switches in Australia within ‘very similar’ and ‘less similar’ food categories in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and the nutritional quality and energy density of consumer purchases.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":23.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-024-00971-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Switches in food and beverage product purchases can reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Allison Gaines, Maria Shahid, Daisy Coyle, Eden Barrett, Michalis Hadjikakou, Jason H. Y. Wu, Fraser Taylor, Simone Pettigrew, Bruce Neal, Paraskevi Seferidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43016-024-00971-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Switching between similar food and beverage products may reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe). Here, using consumer data linked to 23,550 product-specific GHGe values, we estimated annual GHGe attributable to product purchases consumed at home in Australia and calculated reductions from specific switches. Potential changes to mean Health Star Rating, mean energy density and the proportion of ultraprocessed foods purchased were assessed. Approximately 31 million tonnes of GHGe were attributable to products consumed at home in 2019, the three highest contributors of GHGe being ‘meat and meat products’ (49%), ‘dairy’ (17%) and ‘non-alcoholic beverages’ (16%). Switching higher-emission products for ‘very similar’ lower-emission products could reduce total emissions by 26%. Switches to ‘less similar’ lower-emission products could lead to a 71% reduction. Switches had little impact on the average Health Star Rating, energy density of purchases and proportion of ultraprocessed foods purchased. Directing manufacturing and marketing towards lower-environmental-impact products and signposting such options to consumers are key. One strategy to reduce the ecological footprint of food systems is to replace higher-emissions food products with lower-emissions alternatives. This study estimates the potential impact of product switches in Australia within ‘very similar’ and ‘less similar’ food categories in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and the nutritional quality and energy density of consumer purchases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature food\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-024-00971-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature food\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-024-00971-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-024-00971-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在同类食品和饮料产品之间进行转换可以减少温室气体排放(GHGe)。在此,我们利用与 23,550 种特定产品的温室气体排放值相关联的消费者数据,估算了澳大利亚家庭购买产品所产生的年度温室气体排放,并计算了特定转换所减少的温室气体排放。我们对平均健康星级、平均能量密度和超加工食品购买比例的潜在变化进行了评估。2019 年,约有 3100 万吨的温室气体来自于家庭消费的产品,其中温室气体排放量最高的三种产品分别是 "肉类和肉类产品"(49%)、"乳制品"(17%)和 "非酒精饮料"(16%)。将高排放产品换成 "非常相似 "的低排放产品可使总排放量减少 26%。改用 "不太相似 "的低排放产品可使总排放量减少 71%。转换对平均健康星级、购买的能源密度和购买超加工食品的比例影响不大。引导生产和营销低环境影响产品,并向消费者提供此类选择是关键所在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Switches in food and beverage product purchases can reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Australia
Switching between similar food and beverage products may reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe). Here, using consumer data linked to 23,550 product-specific GHGe values, we estimated annual GHGe attributable to product purchases consumed at home in Australia and calculated reductions from specific switches. Potential changes to mean Health Star Rating, mean energy density and the proportion of ultraprocessed foods purchased were assessed. Approximately 31 million tonnes of GHGe were attributable to products consumed at home in 2019, the three highest contributors of GHGe being ‘meat and meat products’ (49%), ‘dairy’ (17%) and ‘non-alcoholic beverages’ (16%). Switching higher-emission products for ‘very similar’ lower-emission products could reduce total emissions by 26%. Switches to ‘less similar’ lower-emission products could lead to a 71% reduction. Switches had little impact on the average Health Star Rating, energy density of purchases and proportion of ultraprocessed foods purchased. Directing manufacturing and marketing towards lower-environmental-impact products and signposting such options to consumers are key. One strategy to reduce the ecological footprint of food systems is to replace higher-emissions food products with lower-emissions alternatives. This study estimates the potential impact of product switches in Australia within ‘very similar’ and ‘less similar’ food categories in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and the nutritional quality and energy density of consumer purchases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
28.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improved modelling of carbon sequestration potential on agricultural land. Diets, health and the environment Enhanced agricultural carbon sinks provide benefits for farmers and the climate Regenerative aquatic foods can be a win–win for human and planetary health Intra-growing season dry–wet spell pattern is a pivotal driver of maize yield variability in sub-Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1