从移动网络数据估算移动设备的移动性和速度

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1007/s11116-024-10494-5
Rémy Scholler, Oumaïma Alaoui-Ismaïli, Denis Renaud, Jean-François Couchot, Eric Ballot
{"title":"从移动网络数据估算移动设备的移动性和速度","authors":"Rémy Scholler, Oumaïma Alaoui-Ismaïli, Denis Renaud, Jean-François Couchot, Eric Ballot","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10494-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The cellular network is now nearly an almost ubiquitous and real-time sensor with coverage anywhere and anytime for any device. Mobile network data is a rich source for official statistics, such as human mobility. However, unlike GPS tracks, each mobile device in this data is described without precise knowledge of its spatial characteristics. Furthermore, there is no information about the device’s mobility status (i.e., whether it is moving or not) or speed which are important for behavioral analysis. Common mobility and speed estimations rely on precise location and do not consider privacy leakage risk. In this work, we propose two probabilistic approaches that estimate respectively devices’ mobility and devices’ speed from cellular data and connection likelihood maps for each network cell. Every estimation is computed in a short time and with a short history of data (for speed and for mobility). This constraint may be helpful with the most stringent legal frameworks for mobile operators including the combination of ePrivacy Directive and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe. The proposed approaches are the first we are aware of that allows for both mobility and speed estimation in this context. We experimented on two datasets, obtained from a mobile network operator’s signaling data and the associated GPS tracks of many consenting users. Our speed estimations are over 20% more accurate than common ones based on mobile sites and we provide confidence intervals for each estimation. Mainly due to mobile network uncertainty, our approach for speed estimation are relatively inaccurate at low speeds and the movement detection could remain unclear. However our approach for mobility estimation fills this gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-stream mobility and speed estimation of mobile devices from mobile network data\",\"authors\":\"Rémy Scholler, Oumaïma Alaoui-Ismaïli, Denis Renaud, Jean-François Couchot, Eric Ballot\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11116-024-10494-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The cellular network is now nearly an almost ubiquitous and real-time sensor with coverage anywhere and anytime for any device. Mobile network data is a rich source for official statistics, such as human mobility. However, unlike GPS tracks, each mobile device in this data is described without precise knowledge of its spatial characteristics. Furthermore, there is no information about the device’s mobility status (i.e., whether it is moving or not) or speed which are important for behavioral analysis. Common mobility and speed estimations rely on precise location and do not consider privacy leakage risk. In this work, we propose two probabilistic approaches that estimate respectively devices’ mobility and devices’ speed from cellular data and connection likelihood maps for each network cell. Every estimation is computed in a short time and with a short history of data (for speed and for mobility). This constraint may be helpful with the most stringent legal frameworks for mobile operators including the combination of ePrivacy Directive and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe. The proposed approaches are the first we are aware of that allows for both mobility and speed estimation in this context. We experimented on two datasets, obtained from a mobile network operator’s signaling data and the associated GPS tracks of many consenting users. Our speed estimations are over 20% more accurate than common ones based on mobile sites and we provide confidence intervals for each estimation. Mainly due to mobile network uncertainty, our approach for speed estimation are relatively inaccurate at low speeds and the movement detection could remain unclear. However our approach for mobility estimation fills this gap.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10494-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10494-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现在,蜂窝网络几乎是无处不在的实时传感器,可随时随地覆盖任何设备。移动网络数据是官方统计数据(如人类流动性)的丰富来源。然而,与 GPS 轨迹不同的是,这些数据中对每个移动设备的描述都无法精确了解其空间特征。此外,这些数据中没有关于设备移动状态(即是否在移动)或速度的信息,而这些信息对于行为分析非常重要。常见的移动性和速度估计依赖于精确的位置,并没有考虑隐私泄露的风险。在这项工作中,我们提出了两种概率方法,分别从蜂窝数据和每个网络小区的连接可能性图来估计设备的移动性和设备的速度。每次估算都是在很短的时间内用很短的历史数据(速度和移动性)计算出来的。这种限制有助于移动运营商遵守最严格的法律框架,包括欧洲的《电子隐私指令》和《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)。据我们所知,所提出的方法是第一种可以在这种情况下同时进行移动性和速度估算的方法。我们在两个数据集上进行了实验,这两个数据集来自移动网络运营商的信令数据和许多同意用户的相关 GPS 轨迹。我们的速度估算结果比基于移动网站的普通估算结果精确 20% 以上,我们还提供了每个估算结果的置信区间。主要由于移动网络的不确定性,我们的速度估算方法在低速时相对不准确,移动检测可能仍然不清晰。然而,我们的移动性估计方法弥补了这一不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In-stream mobility and speed estimation of mobile devices from mobile network data

The cellular network is now nearly an almost ubiquitous and real-time sensor with coverage anywhere and anytime for any device. Mobile network data is a rich source for official statistics, such as human mobility. However, unlike GPS tracks, each mobile device in this data is described without precise knowledge of its spatial characteristics. Furthermore, there is no information about the device’s mobility status (i.e., whether it is moving or not) or speed which are important for behavioral analysis. Common mobility and speed estimations rely on precise location and do not consider privacy leakage risk. In this work, we propose two probabilistic approaches that estimate respectively devices’ mobility and devices’ speed from cellular data and connection likelihood maps for each network cell. Every estimation is computed in a short time and with a short history of data (for speed and for mobility). This constraint may be helpful with the most stringent legal frameworks for mobile operators including the combination of ePrivacy Directive and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe. The proposed approaches are the first we are aware of that allows for both mobility and speed estimation in this context. We experimented on two datasets, obtained from a mobile network operator’s signaling data and the associated GPS tracks of many consenting users. Our speed estimations are over 20% more accurate than common ones based on mobile sites and we provide confidence intervals for each estimation. Mainly due to mobile network uncertainty, our approach for speed estimation are relatively inaccurate at low speeds and the movement detection could remain unclear. However our approach for mobility estimation fills this gap.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
期刊最新文献
From trips to stages: a methodology for Generating Stage Information in trip-level Household travel surveys Transit modal complementarity: measuring the access provided by transfers Multifunctional lightweight autonomous vehicles: an agent-based study Policy paradigms as an analytical concept in transport studies research Quantifying the impact of metrorail transport quality factors on overall user satisfaction: a Brazilian case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1