Juha Piispanen, Ulrich Bergmann, Jouni Karhu, Tuomas Kauppila, Johanna Witzell, Juha Kaitera
{"title":"Cronartium pini 和 C. ribicola 易感和抗性交替宿主叶片中可培养真菌内生菌的多样性和丰度","authors":"Juha Piispanen, Ulrich Bergmann, Jouni Karhu, Tuomas Kauppila, Johanna Witzell, Juha Kaitera","doi":"10.1007/s10658-024-02883-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Cronartium pini</i> and <i>C. ribicola</i> are rust fungi that cause destructive diseases of pines (<i>Pinus</i> spp.). These rusts spread via alternate hosts, among which <i>Melampyrum</i> spp., <i>Veronica</i> spp. and <i>Impatiens</i> spp. are important for <i>C. pini</i> and <i>Ribes</i> spp. for <i>C. ribicola</i>. Congeneric alternate hosts vary in their susceptibility to <i>Cronartium</i> rusts, but the reasons for this variation are not clear. To clarify whether internal, endophytic fungi could explain these differences, we investigated the temporal and spatial variation in fungal endophyte composition of <i>C. pini</i>-resistant <i>M. pratense</i>, <i>V. chamaedrys</i> and <i>I. glandulifera</i>, <i>C. pini</i>-susceptible <i>M. sylvaticum</i>, <i>V. longifolia</i> and <i>I. balsamina</i>, <i>C. ribicola</i>-resistant <i>R. rubrum</i> and <i>C. ribicola</i>-susceptible <i>R. nigrum</i>. In total, 2695 fungal endophytic isolates were obtained and classified into 37 morphotypes, with 1373 cultures isolated in early summer and 1322 in late summer. Fifty-two isolates were identified to species or genus level. The most common morphotypes were identified as <i>Heterophoma</i> sp. Some variation in the abundance of morphotypes occurred between collection sites, but the same morphotypes dominated across the sites and species. The diversity of morphotypes was higher in early September than in late June in all species and the same morphotypes dominated in both early and late season. The diversity of fungal endophytes was higher in resistant <i>Veronica</i> and <i>Ribes</i> than in susceptible congeneric species, but the results suggest that the diversity or abundance of culturable fungal endophytes does not explain the differences in the congeneric species’ susceptibility to rust fungi.</p>","PeriodicalId":12052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity and abundance of culturable fungal endophytes in leaves of susceptible and resistant alternate hosts of Cronartium pini and C. ribicola\",\"authors\":\"Juha Piispanen, Ulrich Bergmann, Jouni Karhu, Tuomas Kauppila, Johanna Witzell, Juha Kaitera\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10658-024-02883-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Cronartium pini</i> and <i>C. ribicola</i> are rust fungi that cause destructive diseases of pines (<i>Pinus</i> spp.). These rusts spread via alternate hosts, among which <i>Melampyrum</i> spp., <i>Veronica</i> spp. and <i>Impatiens</i> spp. are important for <i>C. pini</i> and <i>Ribes</i> spp. for <i>C. ribicola</i>. Congeneric alternate hosts vary in their susceptibility to <i>Cronartium</i> rusts, but the reasons for this variation are not clear. To clarify whether internal, endophytic fungi could explain these differences, we investigated the temporal and spatial variation in fungal endophyte composition of <i>C. pini</i>-resistant <i>M. pratense</i>, <i>V. chamaedrys</i> and <i>I. glandulifera</i>, <i>C. pini</i>-susceptible <i>M. sylvaticum</i>, <i>V. longifolia</i> and <i>I. balsamina</i>, <i>C. ribicola</i>-resistant <i>R. rubrum</i> and <i>C. ribicola</i>-susceptible <i>R. nigrum</i>. In total, 2695 fungal endophytic isolates were obtained and classified into 37 morphotypes, with 1373 cultures isolated in early summer and 1322 in late summer. Fifty-two isolates were identified to species or genus level. The most common morphotypes were identified as <i>Heterophoma</i> sp. Some variation in the abundance of morphotypes occurred between collection sites, but the same morphotypes dominated across the sites and species. The diversity of morphotypes was higher in early September than in late June in all species and the same morphotypes dominated in both early and late season. The diversity of fungal endophytes was higher in resistant <i>Veronica</i> and <i>Ribes</i> than in susceptible congeneric species, but the results suggest that the diversity or abundance of culturable fungal endophytes does not explain the differences in the congeneric species’ susceptibility to rust fungi.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Plant Pathology\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Plant Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02883-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02883-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diversity and abundance of culturable fungal endophytes in leaves of susceptible and resistant alternate hosts of Cronartium pini and C. ribicola
Cronartium pini and C. ribicola are rust fungi that cause destructive diseases of pines (Pinus spp.). These rusts spread via alternate hosts, among which Melampyrum spp., Veronica spp. and Impatiens spp. are important for C. pini and Ribes spp. for C. ribicola. Congeneric alternate hosts vary in their susceptibility to Cronartium rusts, but the reasons for this variation are not clear. To clarify whether internal, endophytic fungi could explain these differences, we investigated the temporal and spatial variation in fungal endophyte composition of C. pini-resistant M. pratense, V. chamaedrys and I. glandulifera, C. pini-susceptible M. sylvaticum, V. longifolia and I. balsamina, C. ribicola-resistant R. rubrum and C. ribicola-susceptible R. nigrum. In total, 2695 fungal endophytic isolates were obtained and classified into 37 morphotypes, with 1373 cultures isolated in early summer and 1322 in late summer. Fifty-two isolates were identified to species or genus level. The most common morphotypes were identified as Heterophoma sp. Some variation in the abundance of morphotypes occurred between collection sites, but the same morphotypes dominated across the sites and species. The diversity of morphotypes was higher in early September than in late June in all species and the same morphotypes dominated in both early and late season. The diversity of fungal endophytes was higher in resistant Veronica and Ribes than in susceptible congeneric species, but the results suggest that the diversity or abundance of culturable fungal endophytes does not explain the differences in the congeneric species’ susceptibility to rust fungi.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Plant Pathology is an international journal publishing original articles in English dealing with fundamental and applied aspects of plant pathology; considering disease in agricultural and horticultural crops, forestry, and in natural plant populations. The types of articles published are :Original Research at the molecular, physiological, whole-plant and population levels; Mini-reviews on topics which are timely and of global rather than national or regional significance; Short Communications for important research findings that can be presented in an abbreviated format; and Letters-to-the-Editor, where these raise issues related to articles previously published in the journal. Submissions relating to disease vector biology and integrated crop protection are welcome. However, routine screenings of plant protection products, varietal trials for disease resistance, and biological control agents are not published in the journal unless framed in the context of strategic approaches to disease management.