操作轮在固定间隔时间表上运行:条件蔗糖强化是通过计划诱导还是强化效应来提高奔跑速度?

Terry W. Belke, Craig H. McClelland
{"title":"操作轮在固定间隔时间表上运行:条件蔗糖强化是通过计划诱导还是强化效应来提高奔跑速度?","authors":"Terry W. Belke, Craig H. McClelland","doi":"10.1007/s40732-024-00599-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sucrose reinforcement increases operant wheel running, but it is not certain that the increase is due to a reinforcement rather than a schedule-induction effect. To address this issue, eight female Long Evans rats were exposed to a fixed-interval (FI) 60-s schedule with wheel running as the operant. Across three conditions, water, sucrose, and water were delivered as outcomes. In addition, rats also ran freely for 20 min prior to, and subsequent to, exposure to the FI 60-s schedule. Results showed that operant wheel running on the FI 60-s schedule increased when sucrose was delivered. At the level of revolutions, over the reinforcement interval more rats showed increased revolutions in the sucrose condition in the latter half of the interval, consistent with a reinforcement effect, than an inverted U-shaped pattern in the initial half of the interval. Running during the pre- and postoperant running period was not substantially affected by the removal of sucrose reinforcement on the FI 60-s schedule. Sucrose reinforcement, but not water, increased running relative to the pre/post running periods. Results suggest that although both schedule-induction and reinforcement effects occur, the effect that dominates appears to be a function of the duration of the reinforcement interval with a reinforcement effect more prevalent with shorter intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":501490,"journal":{"name":"The Psychological Record","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operant Wheel Running on a Fixed Interval Schedule: Does Contingent Sucrose Reinforcement Increase Running through a Schedule-Induction or Reinforcement Effect?\",\"authors\":\"Terry W. Belke, Craig H. McClelland\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40732-024-00599-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Sucrose reinforcement increases operant wheel running, but it is not certain that the increase is due to a reinforcement rather than a schedule-induction effect. To address this issue, eight female Long Evans rats were exposed to a fixed-interval (FI) 60-s schedule with wheel running as the operant. Across three conditions, water, sucrose, and water were delivered as outcomes. In addition, rats also ran freely for 20 min prior to, and subsequent to, exposure to the FI 60-s schedule. Results showed that operant wheel running on the FI 60-s schedule increased when sucrose was delivered. At the level of revolutions, over the reinforcement interval more rats showed increased revolutions in the sucrose condition in the latter half of the interval, consistent with a reinforcement effect, than an inverted U-shaped pattern in the initial half of the interval. Running during the pre- and postoperant running period was not substantially affected by the removal of sucrose reinforcement on the FI 60-s schedule. Sucrose reinforcement, but not water, increased running relative to the pre/post running periods. Results suggest that although both schedule-induction and reinforcement effects occur, the effect that dominates appears to be a function of the duration of the reinforcement interval with a reinforcement effect more prevalent with shorter intervals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Psychological Record\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Psychological Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-024-00599-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Psychological Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-024-00599-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蔗糖强化会增加操作性车轮跑,但还不能确定这种增加是由于强化而不是时间表诱导效应。为了解决这个问题,我们对八只雌性长伊文大鼠进行了60秒固定间隔(FI)训练,以车轮跑为操作行为。在三种条件下,结果分别是水、蔗糖和水。此外,大鼠在接触固定间隔 60 秒时间表之前和之后还自由奔跑了 20 分钟。结果表明,当蔗糖被输送到大鼠体内时,大鼠在FI 60秒计划中的操作性轮跑会增加。在转数水平上,在强化间隔中,更多的大鼠在蔗糖条件下的后半段转数增加,这与强化效应一致,而在强化间隔的前半段则呈倒 U 型。在 FI 60 秒计划中取消蔗糖强化后,大鼠在术前和术后奔跑期的奔跑没有受到实质性影响。蔗糖强化(而不是水)增加了跑步前/后的跑步次数。结果表明,虽然会出现时间表诱导效应和强化效应,但占主导地位的效应似乎是强化间隔时间长短的函数,强化间隔时间越短,强化效应越明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Operant Wheel Running on a Fixed Interval Schedule: Does Contingent Sucrose Reinforcement Increase Running through a Schedule-Induction or Reinforcement Effect?

Sucrose reinforcement increases operant wheel running, but it is not certain that the increase is due to a reinforcement rather than a schedule-induction effect. To address this issue, eight female Long Evans rats were exposed to a fixed-interval (FI) 60-s schedule with wheel running as the operant. Across three conditions, water, sucrose, and water were delivered as outcomes. In addition, rats also ran freely for 20 min prior to, and subsequent to, exposure to the FI 60-s schedule. Results showed that operant wheel running on the FI 60-s schedule increased when sucrose was delivered. At the level of revolutions, over the reinforcement interval more rats showed increased revolutions in the sucrose condition in the latter half of the interval, consistent with a reinforcement effect, than an inverted U-shaped pattern in the initial half of the interval. Running during the pre- and postoperant running period was not substantially affected by the removal of sucrose reinforcement on the FI 60-s schedule. Sucrose reinforcement, but not water, increased running relative to the pre/post running periods. Results suggest that although both schedule-induction and reinforcement effects occur, the effect that dominates appears to be a function of the duration of the reinforcement interval with a reinforcement effect more prevalent with shorter intervals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Laboratory Evaluation of the Effects of Empathy Training on Racial Bias A Replication of a Nonsequential Renewal Model and a Failure to Attenuate Nonsequential Renewal with Extinction Cues Predicting and Interpreting Patterns of Responding on the IRAP in the Context of Facial Emotions and Depression Mathematical Prediction of Emergent Relations in the Merger of Equivalence Classes Differential Trial-Type Effects in an Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: Extending the DAARRE Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1