不同载荷与胶合板面纹角度下云杉胶合板与桦木胶合板之间的粘合强度

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY European Journal of Wood and Wood Products Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1007/s00107-024-02097-9
Tianxiang Wang, Yue Wang, Mattia Debertolis, Roberto Crocetti, Magnus Wålinder, Lars Blomqvist
{"title":"不同载荷与胶合板面纹角度下云杉胶合板与桦木胶合板之间的粘合强度","authors":"Tianxiang Wang,&nbsp;Yue Wang,&nbsp;Mattia Debertolis,&nbsp;Roberto Crocetti,&nbsp;Magnus Wålinder,&nbsp;Lars Blomqvist","doi":"10.1007/s00107-024-02097-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is growing interest recently in reducing the usage of metals in timber structures. Birch plywood possesses satisfactory mechanical properties compared to other wood-based panels and is promising to be utilized in timber connections as a substitute for the more conventional slotted-in metal plate. There are essentially two possibilities to connect plywood plates and other timber elements by means of either mechanical connections or adhesively bonded connections. Despite the more commonly adopted mechanical connections in current timber structures, the adhesively bonded connections hold the distinct advantages of being more cost-effective, stiffer, and with a lower risk of moisture penetration in the timber elements. When employing birch plywood in timber structure applications such as trusses and frame corners, stresses from different directions need to be transmitted by the plywood gusset plate. However, it is still uncertain how the bonding strength is affected by different loading angles to the face grain. This research question, specifically concerning the bonding strength between birch plywood and spruce glulam, has been addressed in this paper. It was found that the bonding strength varies within a relatively small range when the load-to-plywood face grain angle varies from 0° to 90°, which is promising for the development of adhesively bonded joints. Failure mainly occurred in glulam at 0° and 15°; while at other angles, a mixture of cohesive failure in glulam and plywood face veneer was dominant. The weak angle-dependence of the bonding strength can be explained by further checking the shear strength of the weaker wood adherends between glulam and plywood. A strong positive correlation was observed between bonding strength and the wood shear strength.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":550,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","volume":"82 5","pages":"1407 - 1419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00107-024-02097-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bonding strength between spruce glulam and birch plywood at different load-to-plywood face grain angles\",\"authors\":\"Tianxiang Wang,&nbsp;Yue Wang,&nbsp;Mattia Debertolis,&nbsp;Roberto Crocetti,&nbsp;Magnus Wålinder,&nbsp;Lars Blomqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00107-024-02097-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is growing interest recently in reducing the usage of metals in timber structures. Birch plywood possesses satisfactory mechanical properties compared to other wood-based panels and is promising to be utilized in timber connections as a substitute for the more conventional slotted-in metal plate. There are essentially two possibilities to connect plywood plates and other timber elements by means of either mechanical connections or adhesively bonded connections. Despite the more commonly adopted mechanical connections in current timber structures, the adhesively bonded connections hold the distinct advantages of being more cost-effective, stiffer, and with a lower risk of moisture penetration in the timber elements. When employing birch plywood in timber structure applications such as trusses and frame corners, stresses from different directions need to be transmitted by the plywood gusset plate. However, it is still uncertain how the bonding strength is affected by different loading angles to the face grain. This research question, specifically concerning the bonding strength between birch plywood and spruce glulam, has been addressed in this paper. It was found that the bonding strength varies within a relatively small range when the load-to-plywood face grain angle varies from 0° to 90°, which is promising for the development of adhesively bonded joints. Failure mainly occurred in glulam at 0° and 15°; while at other angles, a mixture of cohesive failure in glulam and plywood face veneer was dominant. The weak angle-dependence of the bonding strength can be explained by further checking the shear strength of the weaker wood adherends between glulam and plywood. A strong positive correlation was observed between bonding strength and the wood shear strength.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products\",\"volume\":\"82 5\",\"pages\":\"1407 - 1419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00107-024-02097-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00107-024-02097-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00107-024-02097-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,人们对减少木结构中金属的使用越来越感兴趣。与其他人造板相比,桦木胶合板具有令人满意的机械性能,有望在木材连接中替代传统的开槽金属板。连接胶合板和其他木材构件主要有两种方式,一种是机械连接,另一种是粘合连接。尽管在当前的木结构中机械连接更为普遍,但粘合连接具有成本效益更高、刚度更大、木构件受潮风险更低等明显优势。在桁架和框架转角等木结构应用中使用桦木胶合板时,来自不同方向的应力需要通过胶合板夹板来传递。然而,目前还不清楚不同的加载角度对面层纹理的粘合强度有何影响。本文探讨了这一研究问题,特别是桦木胶合板与云杉胶合木之间的粘合强度。研究发现,当荷载与胶合板面纹理的夹角从 0° 到 90° 变化时,粘合强度的变化范围相对较小,这对粘合连接的发展很有希望。失效主要发生在 0° 和 15° 时的胶合板上;而在其他角度时,胶合板和胶合板面单板主要发生内聚失效。通过进一步检查胶合板和胶合板之间较弱木材附着物的剪切强度,可以解释粘接强度与角度的微弱相关性。粘合强度与木材剪切强度之间存在很强的正相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bonding strength between spruce glulam and birch plywood at different load-to-plywood face grain angles

There is growing interest recently in reducing the usage of metals in timber structures. Birch plywood possesses satisfactory mechanical properties compared to other wood-based panels and is promising to be utilized in timber connections as a substitute for the more conventional slotted-in metal plate. There are essentially two possibilities to connect plywood plates and other timber elements by means of either mechanical connections or adhesively bonded connections. Despite the more commonly adopted mechanical connections in current timber structures, the adhesively bonded connections hold the distinct advantages of being more cost-effective, stiffer, and with a lower risk of moisture penetration in the timber elements. When employing birch plywood in timber structure applications such as trusses and frame corners, stresses from different directions need to be transmitted by the plywood gusset plate. However, it is still uncertain how the bonding strength is affected by different loading angles to the face grain. This research question, specifically concerning the bonding strength between birch plywood and spruce glulam, has been addressed in this paper. It was found that the bonding strength varies within a relatively small range when the load-to-plywood face grain angle varies from 0° to 90°, which is promising for the development of adhesively bonded joints. Failure mainly occurred in glulam at 0° and 15°; while at other angles, a mixture of cohesive failure in glulam and plywood face veneer was dominant. The weak angle-dependence of the bonding strength can be explained by further checking the shear strength of the weaker wood adherends between glulam and plywood. A strong positive correlation was observed between bonding strength and the wood shear strength.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Wood and Wood Products reports on original research and new developments in the field of wood and wood products and their biological, chemical, physical as well as mechanical and technological properties, processes and uses. Subjects range from roundwood to wood based products, composite materials and structural applications, with related jointing techniques. Moreover, it deals with wood as a chemical raw material, source of energy as well as with inter-disciplinary aspects of environmental assessment and international markets. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products aims at promoting international scientific communication and transfer of new technologies from research into practice.
期刊最新文献
Study on the rotational performance of steel hub joints of wood reticulated domes subjected to monotonic bending moment Understanding the adhesion performance of glued laminated timber manufactured with Australian softwood and high-density hardwood species Selected physical and mechanical properties of particleboards manufactured with addition of Betula bark post-extraction residues Image-based mesh generation for constructing a virtual representation of engineered wood product samples Effect of microwave-assisted softening on the physicochemical properties of Moso bamboo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1