关于内外科病房护士配置比例的不同观点:德尔菲政策分析。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Outlook Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102184
Sarah A. Delgado DNP, RN, ACNP , Nancy T. Blake PhD, RN, FAAN , Theresa Brown DNP, ACNP-BC, FAANP , Lauren Clark PhD, RN, FAAN , Jack Needleman PhD, FAAN , Linda Cassidy PhD, RN, CCRN
{"title":"关于内外科病房护士配置比例的不同观点:德尔菲政策分析。","authors":"Sarah A. Delgado DNP, RN, ACNP ,&nbsp;Nancy T. Blake PhD, RN, FAAN ,&nbsp;Theresa Brown DNP, ACNP-BC, FAANP ,&nbsp;Lauren Clark PhD, RN, FAAN ,&nbsp;Jack Needleman PhD, FAAN ,&nbsp;Linda Cassidy PhD, RN, CCRN","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Appropriate staffing is essential to acute care delivery. Staffing ratio policy generates controversy.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study examines perspectives on unit-level nurse-to-patient ratio policy in adult medical–surgical units.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Delphi methodology uses an invited diverse panel to analyze a policy’s effects. Panelists completed iterative surveys about the impact they expect from unit-level ratio policy.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Panelists demonstrated moderate agreement that the proposed policy could increase staffing levels, decrease patient length of stay, and reduce nurse attrition. Other potential outcomes included reducing staffing in units above the minimum and increasing short-term costs. Panelists agreed that the policy could increase patient safety and nurse satisfaction and did not agree about the effect on long-term cost and innovation. Panelists also anticipated a mostly positive effect on patients and nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Policies that set unit-level nurse-to-patient ratios offer a potential strategy to improve medical–surgical staffing. Policy design should consider the range of expected outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":"72 4","pages":"Article 102184"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diverse perspectives on unit-level nurse staffing ratios in medical–surgical units: A Delphi policy analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sarah A. Delgado DNP, RN, ACNP ,&nbsp;Nancy T. Blake PhD, RN, FAAN ,&nbsp;Theresa Brown DNP, ACNP-BC, FAANP ,&nbsp;Lauren Clark PhD, RN, FAAN ,&nbsp;Jack Needleman PhD, FAAN ,&nbsp;Linda Cassidy PhD, RN, CCRN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Appropriate staffing is essential to acute care delivery. Staffing ratio policy generates controversy.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study examines perspectives on unit-level nurse-to-patient ratio policy in adult medical–surgical units.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Delphi methodology uses an invited diverse panel to analyze a policy’s effects. Panelists completed iterative surveys about the impact they expect from unit-level ratio policy.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Panelists demonstrated moderate agreement that the proposed policy could increase staffing levels, decrease patient length of stay, and reduce nurse attrition. Other potential outcomes included reducing staffing in units above the minimum and increasing short-term costs. Panelists agreed that the policy could increase patient safety and nurse satisfaction and did not agree about the effect on long-term cost and innovation. Panelists also anticipated a mostly positive effect on patients and nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Policies that set unit-level nurse-to-patient ratios offer a potential strategy to improve medical–surgical staffing. Policy design should consider the range of expected outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"volume\":\"72 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 102184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424000770\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424000770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:适当的人员配备对急症护理服务至关重要。目的:本研究探讨了对成人内外科病房护士与患者比例政策的看法:德尔菲法采用受邀的不同小组来分析政策的效果。小组成员完成了关于他们对单位级别比例政策预期影响的反复调查:小组成员对拟议政策可提高人员配备水平、缩短患者住院时间和减少护士自然减员的看法基本一致。其他可能的结果包括减少超过最低标准的科室人员配备和增加短期成本。专家组成员一致认为该政策可提高患者安全和护士满意度,但对长期成本和创新的影响未达成一致。小组成员还预计,该政策对患者和护士的影响大多是积极的:讨论:设定科室护士与患者比例的政策为改善内外科人员配备提供了潜在策略。政策设计应考虑预期结果的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diverse perspectives on unit-level nurse staffing ratios in medical–surgical units: A Delphi policy analysis

Background

Appropriate staffing is essential to acute care delivery. Staffing ratio policy generates controversy.

Purpose

This study examines perspectives on unit-level nurse-to-patient ratio policy in adult medical–surgical units.

Method

Delphi methodology uses an invited diverse panel to analyze a policy’s effects. Panelists completed iterative surveys about the impact they expect from unit-level ratio policy.

Findings

Panelists demonstrated moderate agreement that the proposed policy could increase staffing levels, decrease patient length of stay, and reduce nurse attrition. Other potential outcomes included reducing staffing in units above the minimum and increasing short-term costs. Panelists agreed that the policy could increase patient safety and nurse satisfaction and did not agree about the effect on long-term cost and innovation. Panelists also anticipated a mostly positive effect on patients and nurses.

Discussion

Policies that set unit-level nurse-to-patient ratios offer a potential strategy to improve medical–surgical staffing. Policy design should consider the range of expected outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Outlook
Nursing Outlook 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.
期刊最新文献
Preparing the next generation of nurse leaders in education, science, and practice: Lessons from four Robert Wood Johnson Foundation programs. A content analysis defining research-focused faculty research success. Using an organizational framework to drive change in nursing education: An action plan for nurse leaders. State of Black men in nursing: An oral history of the challenges and the benefits of five Black male nurse leaders An evaluation of a student-led nursing leadership symposium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1