胰腺手术后门静脉支架置入术后使用或不使用抗血栓治疗的通畅率和并发症比较,系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY International journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000001755
Lin Chen, Ziyan Wang, Liangbo Dong, Zhiwei Wang, Zehui Li, Weibin Wang
{"title":"胰腺手术后门静脉支架置入术后使用或不使用抗血栓治疗的通畅率和并发症比较,系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Lin Chen, Ziyan Wang, Liangbo Dong, Zhiwei Wang, Zehui Li, Weibin Wang","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000001755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Portal vein stent placement is used for portal vein stenosis. However, reports on postpancreatic surgery cases are rare. Whether antithrombotic therapy should be administered remains controversial. In this paper, the authors reviewed current data to evaluate the influence of antithrombosis on stent patency after pancreatic surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis compared studies in which patients did or did not receive antithrombotic therapy after portal vein stent placement. The authors compared patency after stent placement and complication rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 22 ( n =207) studies in which patients received antithrombotic therapy and 8 ( n =61) in which patients did not receive therapy. Antithrombotic agents, such as aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, and warfarin, were used. The overall patency rates were similar between the groups (79.2% in the antithrombosis group vs. 88.0% in the nonantithrombosis group). Subgroup analyses included those for the etiology of stenosis, types of antithrombotic agents, acute or chronic stenosis, and causes of stent stenosis. None revealed a significant difference between the patency rates in the antithrombosis and nonantithrombosis groups. However, bleeding complications only occurred in patients who received antithrombotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no significant benefit of antithrombotic therapy after portal vein stent placement following pancreatic surgery. Antithrombotic therapy should be performed with caution because it may cause complications, such as bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"5771-5780"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of patency rates and complications with or without antithrombotic therapy following portal vein stent placement after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lin Chen, Ziyan Wang, Liangbo Dong, Zhiwei Wang, Zehui Li, Weibin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000001755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Portal vein stent placement is used for portal vein stenosis. However, reports on postpancreatic surgery cases are rare. Whether antithrombotic therapy should be administered remains controversial. In this paper, the authors reviewed current data to evaluate the influence of antithrombosis on stent patency after pancreatic surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis compared studies in which patients did or did not receive antithrombotic therapy after portal vein stent placement. The authors compared patency after stent placement and complication rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 22 ( n =207) studies in which patients received antithrombotic therapy and 8 ( n =61) in which patients did not receive therapy. Antithrombotic agents, such as aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, and warfarin, were used. The overall patency rates were similar between the groups (79.2% in the antithrombosis group vs. 88.0% in the nonantithrombosis group). Subgroup analyses included those for the etiology of stenosis, types of antithrombotic agents, acute or chronic stenosis, and causes of stent stenosis. None revealed a significant difference between the patency rates in the antithrombosis and nonantithrombosis groups. However, bleeding complications only occurred in patients who received antithrombotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no significant benefit of antithrombotic therapy after portal vein stent placement following pancreatic surgery. Antithrombotic therapy should be performed with caution because it may cause complications, such as bleeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5771-5780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392126/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001755\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001755","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:门静脉支架置入术用于治疗门静脉狭窄。然而,有关胰腺手术后病例的报道却很少见。是否应进行抗血栓治疗仍存在争议。本文回顾了目前的数据,以评估抗血栓对胰腺手术后支架通畅性的影响:本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了门静脉支架置入后患者接受或不接受抗血栓治疗的研究。我们比较了支架置入后的通畅率和并发症发生率:患者接受抗血栓治疗的研究有 22 项(n=207),未接受治疗的研究有 8 项(n=61)。使用的抗血栓药物包括阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、肝素和华法林。两组的总体通畅率相似(抗血栓组为 79.2%,非抗血栓组为 88.0%)。亚组分析包括狭窄病因、抗血栓药物类型、急性或慢性狭窄以及支架狭窄原因。结果显示,抗血栓组和非抗血栓组的通畅率差异不大。然而,只有接受抗血栓治疗的患者才会出现出血并发症:结论:胰腺手术后门静脉支架置入术后抗血栓治疗无明显益处。结论:胰腺手术后门静脉支架置入术后抗血栓治疗无明显益处,应谨慎进行抗血栓治疗,因为它可能导致出血等并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of patency rates and complications with or without antithrombotic therapy following portal vein stent placement after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Portal vein stent placement is used for portal vein stenosis. However, reports on postpancreatic surgery cases are rare. Whether antithrombotic therapy should be administered remains controversial. In this paper, the authors reviewed current data to evaluate the influence of antithrombosis on stent patency after pancreatic surgery.

Materials and methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared studies in which patients did or did not receive antithrombotic therapy after portal vein stent placement. The authors compared patency after stent placement and complication rate.

Results: There were 22 ( n =207) studies in which patients received antithrombotic therapy and 8 ( n =61) in which patients did not receive therapy. Antithrombotic agents, such as aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, and warfarin, were used. The overall patency rates were similar between the groups (79.2% in the antithrombosis group vs. 88.0% in the nonantithrombosis group). Subgroup analyses included those for the etiology of stenosis, types of antithrombotic agents, acute or chronic stenosis, and causes of stent stenosis. None revealed a significant difference between the patency rates in the antithrombosis and nonantithrombosis groups. However, bleeding complications only occurred in patients who received antithrombotic therapy.

Conclusion: There is no significant benefit of antithrombotic therapy after portal vein stent placement following pancreatic surgery. Antithrombotic therapy should be performed with caution because it may cause complications, such as bleeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
期刊最新文献
Cutting-edge nanotechnology transforming cancer surgery and recovery. Enhancing postoperative care with telemedicine and remote monitoring for improved recovery and patient safety. Letter to the editor regarding 'Using computed tomography to evaluate anatomic landmarks in taiwanese trauma patients for insertion of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: A retrospective cohort study' - liberating REBOA from imaging. Revolutionizing medicine: Recent developments and future prospects in stem-cell therapy. Shock wave-pretreated ADMSCs of cell-sheet scaffold (CSS) patched on left ventricular wall (LVW) inhibited LVW remodeling in mini-pig MI ---role CSS on counteracting Laplace's Law of LVW stress: Experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1