尿液中产广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌社区流行率的增加与地区级抗生素消耗量的增加有关。

IF 2.2 4区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY Fems Microbiology Letters Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1093/femsle/fnae038
Larissa Hermann de Souza Nunes, Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro, Rafael Buttini Salviato, Ana Paula de Andrade, Paula Hansen Suss, Fernando José Vicenzi, Adriano Akira Ferreira Hino, João Paulo Telles, Felipe Francisco Tuon
{"title":"尿液中产广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌社区流行率的增加与地区级抗生素消耗量的增加有关。","authors":"Larissa Hermann de Souza Nunes, Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro, Rafael Buttini Salviato, Ana Paula de Andrade, Paula Hansen Suss, Fernando José Vicenzi, Adriano Akira Ferreira Hino, João Paulo Telles, Felipe Francisco Tuon","doi":"10.1093/femsle/fnae038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze ESBL-producing Escherichia coli prevalence in urine samples collected between 2011-2019 in Curitiba, a large city in Brazil, and relating it to antibiotic consumption and sanitary conditions. This is a longitudinal study correlating prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from urine samples with district-level antibiotic consumption and sociodemographic data during 2011-2019. E. coli isolates were tested for antibiotic susceptibility and ESBL by an automated method. Statistical analysis applied linear regressions, pooled ordinary least squares, and fixed effects models for districts or years. The Chow and Hausman tests indicated that the fixed effects model for individual districts fitted best. Chi-square test was used for qualitative variables (statistical significance was set when P < 0.05). Among the 886 535 urine sample cultures, 9.9% of isolates were ESBL-producing E. coli. Their prevalence increased from 4.7% in 2012 to 19.3% in 2019 (P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.922). This progressive increase correlated with age (P = 0.007; R2 = 0.8725) and male gender (P < 0.001) and increased antibiotic consumption (P = 0.0386; R2 = 0.47). The fixed effects model showed that district influences ESBL prevalence and that antibiotic consumption explains 20%-30% of this variation, with an increase of one defined daily dose accounting for an increase of 0.02084 percentage points of ESBL. The increasing prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli can, to a considerable extent, be explained by increasing antibiotic consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":12214,"journal":{"name":"Fems Microbiology Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing community prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in urine is associated with increasing district-level antibiotic consumption.\",\"authors\":\"Larissa Hermann de Souza Nunes, Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro, Rafael Buttini Salviato, Ana Paula de Andrade, Paula Hansen Suss, Fernando José Vicenzi, Adriano Akira Ferreira Hino, João Paulo Telles, Felipe Francisco Tuon\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/femsle/fnae038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze ESBL-producing Escherichia coli prevalence in urine samples collected between 2011-2019 in Curitiba, a large city in Brazil, and relating it to antibiotic consumption and sanitary conditions. This is a longitudinal study correlating prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from urine samples with district-level antibiotic consumption and sociodemographic data during 2011-2019. E. coli isolates were tested for antibiotic susceptibility and ESBL by an automated method. Statistical analysis applied linear regressions, pooled ordinary least squares, and fixed effects models for districts or years. The Chow and Hausman tests indicated that the fixed effects model for individual districts fitted best. Chi-square test was used for qualitative variables (statistical significance was set when P < 0.05). Among the 886 535 urine sample cultures, 9.9% of isolates were ESBL-producing E. coli. Their prevalence increased from 4.7% in 2012 to 19.3% in 2019 (P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.922). This progressive increase correlated with age (P = 0.007; R2 = 0.8725) and male gender (P < 0.001) and increased antibiotic consumption (P = 0.0386; R2 = 0.47). The fixed effects model showed that district influences ESBL prevalence and that antibiotic consumption explains 20%-30% of this variation, with an increase of one defined daily dose accounting for an increase of 0.02084 percentage points of ESBL. The increasing prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli can, to a considerable extent, be explained by increasing antibiotic consumption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fems Microbiology Letters\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fems Microbiology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnae038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fems Microbiology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnae038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本研究旨在分析2011-2019年间在巴西大城市库里蒂巴收集的尿液样本中产ESBL大肠埃希菌的流行情况,并将其与抗生素消耗量和卫生条件联系起来:这是一项纵向研究,将 2011-2019 年间从尿液样本中分离出的产 ESBL 大肠杆菌的流行率与区级抗生素消耗量和社会人口学数据相关联。采用自动化方法对大肠杆菌分离物进行抗生素敏感性和 ESBL 检测。统计分析采用线性回归、集合普通最小二乘法和地区或年份固定效应模型。周氏检验和豪斯曼检验表明,单个地区的固定效应模型最合适。对定性变量采用了卡方检验(当 p 为 0 时,统计学意义成立):在 886 535 份尿液样本培养物中,9.9% 的分离物为产 ESBL 大肠杆菌。其流行率从2011年的4.7%增至2019年的19.3%(p结论:产ESBL大肠杆菌患病率的增加在很大程度上可以用抗生素用量的增加来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Increasing community prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in urine is associated with increasing district-level antibiotic consumption.

This study aimed to analyze ESBL-producing Escherichia coli prevalence in urine samples collected between 2011-2019 in Curitiba, a large city in Brazil, and relating it to antibiotic consumption and sanitary conditions. This is a longitudinal study correlating prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from urine samples with district-level antibiotic consumption and sociodemographic data during 2011-2019. E. coli isolates were tested for antibiotic susceptibility and ESBL by an automated method. Statistical analysis applied linear regressions, pooled ordinary least squares, and fixed effects models for districts or years. The Chow and Hausman tests indicated that the fixed effects model for individual districts fitted best. Chi-square test was used for qualitative variables (statistical significance was set when P < 0.05). Among the 886 535 urine sample cultures, 9.9% of isolates were ESBL-producing E. coli. Their prevalence increased from 4.7% in 2012 to 19.3% in 2019 (P < 0.0001; R2 = 0.922). This progressive increase correlated with age (P = 0.007; R2 = 0.8725) and male gender (P < 0.001) and increased antibiotic consumption (P = 0.0386; R2 = 0.47). The fixed effects model showed that district influences ESBL prevalence and that antibiotic consumption explains 20%-30% of this variation, with an increase of one defined daily dose accounting for an increase of 0.02084 percentage points of ESBL. The increasing prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli can, to a considerable extent, be explained by increasing antibiotic consumption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fems Microbiology Letters
Fems Microbiology Letters 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: FEMS Microbiology Letters gives priority to concise papers that merit rapid publication by virtue of their originality, general interest and contribution to new developments in microbiology. All aspects of microbiology, including virology, are covered. 2019 Impact Factor: 1.987, Journal Citation Reports (Source Clarivate, 2020) Ranking: 98/135 (Microbiology) The journal is divided into eight Sections: Physiology and Biochemistry (including genetics, molecular biology and ‘omic’ studies) Food Microbiology (from food production and biotechnology to spoilage and food borne pathogens) Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology Pathogens and Pathogenicity (including medical, veterinary, plant and insect pathogens – particularly those relating to food security – with the exception of viruses) Environmental Microbiology (including ecophysiology, ecogenomics and meta-omic studies) Virology (viruses infecting any organism, including Bacteria and Archaea) Taxonomy and Systematics (for publication of novel taxa, taxonomic reclassifications and reviews of a taxonomic nature) Professional Development (including education, training, CPD, research assessment frameworks, research and publication metrics, best-practice, careers and history of microbiology) If you are unsure which Section is most appropriate for your manuscript, for example in the case of transdisciplinary studies, we recommend that you contact the Editor-In-Chief by email prior to submission. Our scope includes any type of microorganism - all members of the Bacteria and the Archaea and microbial members of the Eukarya (yeasts, filamentous fungi, microbial algae, protozoa, oomycetes, myxomycetes, etc.) as well as all viruses.
期刊最新文献
Disruption of the pkac2 gene in Pleurotus ostreatus alters cell wall structures and enables mycelial dispersion in liquid culture. Temporal control of Staphylococcus aureus intracellular pH by sodium and potassium. DIVULSUPERBAC: an outreach project to raise awareness of antimicrobial resistance. Genome-based analysis of biosynthetic potential from antimycotic Streptomyces rochei strain A144. Menaquinone production in genetically engineered E. coli.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1