与胰岛素相比,二甲双胍可降低烧伤患者的死亡和发病风险

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Burns Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2024.05.015
{"title":"与胰岛素相比,二甲双胍可降低烧伤患者的死亡和发病风险","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2024.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><span>The standard of care for burned patients experiencing hyperglycemia<span> associated with the hypermetabolic response is insulin therapy. Insulin treatment predisposes burn patients to hypoglycemia, which increases morbidity and mortality. </span></span>Metformin<span> has been suggested as an alternative to insulin therapy for glycemic control in burn patients given its safety profile, but further research is warranted. This study investigated whether metformin use in burn patients is associated with improved glycemic control and morbidity/mortality outcomes compared to insulin use alone.</span></p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p><span>Using the TriNetX database, we conducted a retrospective study of burned patients who were administered insulin, metformin, or both within one week of injury. Demographic, comorbidity, and burn severity information were collected. Patients were categorized by treatment type, propensity score-matched, and compared for the following outcomes within 3 months: </span>hyperglycemia<span><span>, hypoglycemia, sepsis, </span>lactic acidosis, and death. Statistical significance was set a priori at p ≤ 0.05.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The insulin cohort was at increased risk for all outcomes (all p &lt; 0.0001) compared to the metformin cohort, and an increased risk for sepsis, lactic acidosis, and death (all p ≤ 0.0002) compared to the insulin/metformin combination cohort. When compared to the metformin cohort, the combination cohort was at increased risk for all outcomes (all p ≤ 0.0107) except death.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Treatment with metformin after burn is associated with a reduced risk of morbidity and mortality compared to insulin. The combination of insulin and metformin is no more effective in reducing the risk of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia than insulin alone but is less effective than metformin alone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metformin is associated with reduced risk of mortality and morbidity in burn patients compared to insulin\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.burns.2024.05.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><span>The standard of care for burned patients experiencing hyperglycemia<span> associated with the hypermetabolic response is insulin therapy. Insulin treatment predisposes burn patients to hypoglycemia, which increases morbidity and mortality. </span></span>Metformin<span> has been suggested as an alternative to insulin therapy for glycemic control in burn patients given its safety profile, but further research is warranted. This study investigated whether metformin use in burn patients is associated with improved glycemic control and morbidity/mortality outcomes compared to insulin use alone.</span></p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p><span>Using the TriNetX database, we conducted a retrospective study of burned patients who were administered insulin, metformin, or both within one week of injury. Demographic, comorbidity, and burn severity information were collected. Patients were categorized by treatment type, propensity score-matched, and compared for the following outcomes within 3 months: </span>hyperglycemia<span><span>, hypoglycemia, sepsis, </span>lactic acidosis, and death. Statistical significance was set a priori at p ≤ 0.05.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The insulin cohort was at increased risk for all outcomes (all p &lt; 0.0001) compared to the metformin cohort, and an increased risk for sepsis, lactic acidosis, and death (all p ≤ 0.0002) compared to the insulin/metformin combination cohort. When compared to the metformin cohort, the combination cohort was at increased risk for all outcomes (all p ≤ 0.0107) except death.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Treatment with metformin after burn is associated with a reduced risk of morbidity and mortality compared to insulin. The combination of insulin and metformin is no more effective in reducing the risk of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia than insulin alone but is less effective than metformin alone.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Burns\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Burns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417924001670\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417924001670","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于因高代谢反应而出现高血糖的烧伤患者,治疗标准是胰岛素治疗。胰岛素治疗易使烧伤患者发生低血糖,从而增加发病率和死亡率。鉴于二甲双胍的安全性,有人建议将其作为胰岛素治疗的替代品,用于烧伤患者的血糖控制,但仍需进一步研究。本研究调查了与单独使用胰岛素相比,烧伤患者使用二甲双胍是否能改善血糖控制和发病率/死亡率。我们利用 TriNetX 数据库,对受伤后一周内使用胰岛素、二甲双胍或同时使用这两种药物的烧伤患者进行了一项回顾性研究。我们收集了人口统计学、合并症和烧伤严重程度的信息。按照治疗类型对患者进行分类、倾向评分匹配,并比较患者在 3 个月内的以下结果:高血糖、低血糖、败血症、乳酸酸中毒和死亡。统计显著性先验设定为 p≤ 0.05。与二甲双胍队列相比,胰岛素队列出现所有结果的风险均增加(均 p < 0.0001),与胰岛素/二甲双胍联合队列相比,出现败血症、乳酸酸中毒和死亡的风险均增加(均 p ≤ 0.0002)。与二甲双胍队列相比,除死亡外,二甲双胍联合队列的所有结果风险均增加(所有 p 均≤ 0.0107)。与胰岛素相比,烧伤后使用二甲双胍治疗可降低发病和死亡风险。在降低高血糖和低血糖风险方面,联合使用胰岛素和二甲双胍并不比单独使用胰岛素更有效,但效果不如单独使用二甲双胍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Metformin is associated with reduced risk of mortality and morbidity in burn patients compared to insulin

Purpose

The standard of care for burned patients experiencing hyperglycemia associated with the hypermetabolic response is insulin therapy. Insulin treatment predisposes burn patients to hypoglycemia, which increases morbidity and mortality. Metformin has been suggested as an alternative to insulin therapy for glycemic control in burn patients given its safety profile, but further research is warranted. This study investigated whether metformin use in burn patients is associated with improved glycemic control and morbidity/mortality outcomes compared to insulin use alone.

Materials and methods

Using the TriNetX database, we conducted a retrospective study of burned patients who were administered insulin, metformin, or both within one week of injury. Demographic, comorbidity, and burn severity information were collected. Patients were categorized by treatment type, propensity score-matched, and compared for the following outcomes within 3 months: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, sepsis, lactic acidosis, and death. Statistical significance was set a priori at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

The insulin cohort was at increased risk for all outcomes (all p < 0.0001) compared to the metformin cohort, and an increased risk for sepsis, lactic acidosis, and death (all p ≤ 0.0002) compared to the insulin/metformin combination cohort. When compared to the metformin cohort, the combination cohort was at increased risk for all outcomes (all p ≤ 0.0107) except death.

Conclusions

Treatment with metformin after burn is associated with a reduced risk of morbidity and mortality compared to insulin. The combination of insulin and metformin is no more effective in reducing the risk of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia than insulin alone but is less effective than metformin alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Burns
Burns 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
304
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice. Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.
期刊最新文献
Has the energy poverty crisis fuelled a rise in hot water bottle burn injuries within the United Kingdom? "To BAL or not to BAL, that is the question": Variations in smoke inhalation injury guidelines from burn units and centres in England, Scotland and Wales. Tourniquet burns: Best practices for alcohol skin preparation. Randomized, controlled, within-patient, single-blinded pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of 12-weeks of endermotherapy with adult burn survivors. Association of length of hospital stay, total body surface area burned, and Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in burn patients: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1