重症监护速成护理专业学生的压力感知、应对策略和教师支持

Amina Hemida Salem
{"title":"重症监护速成护理专业学生的压力感知、应对策略和教师支持","authors":"Amina Hemida Salem","doi":"10.21608/ejhc.2024.353613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : There is an increased and continuous demand for nurses. The accelerated nursing program is a fast-track entry-level program and offers the quickest route to provide a baccalaureate degree in nursing for non-nursing graduates. Most of the enrolled students, particularly those who graduated from art and philosophical colleges, are beginners in complex and dense nursing curricula, e.g. critical care and emergency nursing courses. Those students experienced several stressors and challenges while trying to adapt or integrate into these complex nursing courses and these stressors contributed to students’ dissatisfaction and altered students well-being, academic achievement, and increased failure rates. Aim: Determine the stressors, coping strategies used for stress resolution, and faculty support as perceived by accelerated students who enrolled in the critical care courses. Design: the study includes 2 parts quantitative and qualitative. For the quantitative part, a descriptive cross-sectional study design was employed. In addition, for the qualitative part. a qualitative survey consisting of one open-ended question was used to get an in-depth understanding of the other stressors that were not captured in the questionnaire. Setting: the study was conducted in the critical care nursing department at the faculty of nursing, Alexandria University. Sample: A convenience sampling of all students enrolled in the critical care nursing courses (I & II) who agreed to participate in the study were recruited. Tools: a self-reported online package included three tools used to determine stressors, coping strategies, and faculty support namely: (1) Student Nurse Stress Index Scale (SNSI). (2) Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief-COPE) Scale, and (3) Perceived Faculty Support Scale (PFSS). In addition, The qualitative survey consists of one structured open-ended question that asks the students to mention other stressors or challenges that were not captured in the SNSI and/or to provide more elaboration regarding their stressors. Results showed that the “fear of failing a course” was perceived as the most stressful among all students. In addition, the highest coping strategy adopted was “religion-related strategies”, and the lowest adaptive coping strategy adopted by both groups was “humor”. Adaptive coping styles had a significant negative correlation with maladaptive coping styles as (r = -0.374, p < 0.001) and a significant positive correlation with the perceived faculty support scale as (r = 0.098, p = 0.027). Maladaptive coping styles were significantly negatively correlated with the perceived faculty support scale as (r = -0.244, p < 0.001). These correlations suggest that higher stress levels were associated with more maladaptive coping styles and less perceived faculty support, while more adaptive coping styles were associated with less maladaptive and more perceived faculty support. Furthermore, qualitative analysis of the open-ended question revealed that the highest three themes that emerged were: limited time too much academic load, and financial burden. Conclusions: Based on the results of the current study, it could be concluded that all students who participated in this study were experiencing stressors. Adaptive coping styles had a significant negative correlation with maladaptive coping styles and a significant positive correlation with the perceived faculty support scale. While maladaptive coping styles were significantly negatively correlated with the perceived faculty support scale. These correlations suggest that higher stress levels were associated with more maladaptive coping styles and less perceived faculty support, while more adaptive coping styles were associated with less maladaptive and more perceived faculty support. Finally, limited time due to heavy academic loads, and financial burdens extracted from the analysis of the qualitative survey were identified as stressors by the vast majority of the students.","PeriodicalId":505881,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Health Care","volume":"10 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Stressors, Coping Strategies, And Faculty Support Among Critical Care Accelerated Nursing Students\",\"authors\":\"Amina Hemida Salem\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejhc.2024.353613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : There is an increased and continuous demand for nurses. The accelerated nursing program is a fast-track entry-level program and offers the quickest route to provide a baccalaureate degree in nursing for non-nursing graduates. Most of the enrolled students, particularly those who graduated from art and philosophical colleges, are beginners in complex and dense nursing curricula, e.g. critical care and emergency nursing courses. Those students experienced several stressors and challenges while trying to adapt or integrate into these complex nursing courses and these stressors contributed to students’ dissatisfaction and altered students well-being, academic achievement, and increased failure rates. Aim: Determine the stressors, coping strategies used for stress resolution, and faculty support as perceived by accelerated students who enrolled in the critical care courses. Design: the study includes 2 parts quantitative and qualitative. For the quantitative part, a descriptive cross-sectional study design was employed. In addition, for the qualitative part. a qualitative survey consisting of one open-ended question was used to get an in-depth understanding of the other stressors that were not captured in the questionnaire. Setting: the study was conducted in the critical care nursing department at the faculty of nursing, Alexandria University. Sample: A convenience sampling of all students enrolled in the critical care nursing courses (I & II) who agreed to participate in the study were recruited. Tools: a self-reported online package included three tools used to determine stressors, coping strategies, and faculty support namely: (1) Student Nurse Stress Index Scale (SNSI). (2) Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief-COPE) Scale, and (3) Perceived Faculty Support Scale (PFSS). In addition, The qualitative survey consists of one structured open-ended question that asks the students to mention other stressors or challenges that were not captured in the SNSI and/or to provide more elaboration regarding their stressors. Results showed that the “fear of failing a course” was perceived as the most stressful among all students. In addition, the highest coping strategy adopted was “religion-related strategies”, and the lowest adaptive coping strategy adopted by both groups was “humor”. Adaptive coping styles had a significant negative correlation with maladaptive coping styles as (r = -0.374, p < 0.001) and a significant positive correlation with the perceived faculty support scale as (r = 0.098, p = 0.027). Maladaptive coping styles were significantly negatively correlated with the perceived faculty support scale as (r = -0.244, p < 0.001). These correlations suggest that higher stress levels were associated with more maladaptive coping styles and less perceived faculty support, while more adaptive coping styles were associated with less maladaptive and more perceived faculty support. Furthermore, qualitative analysis of the open-ended question revealed that the highest three themes that emerged were: limited time too much academic load, and financial burden. Conclusions: Based on the results of the current study, it could be concluded that all students who participated in this study were experiencing stressors. Adaptive coping styles had a significant negative correlation with maladaptive coping styles and a significant positive correlation with the perceived faculty support scale. While maladaptive coping styles were significantly negatively correlated with the perceived faculty support scale. These correlations suggest that higher stress levels were associated with more maladaptive coping styles and less perceived faculty support, while more adaptive coping styles were associated with less maladaptive and more perceived faculty support. Finally, limited time due to heavy academic loads, and financial burdens extracted from the analysis of the qualitative survey were identified as stressors by the vast majority of the students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Health Care\",\"volume\":\"10 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhc.2024.353613\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhc.2024.353613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对护士的需求不断增加。护理速成课程是一个快速入门课程,为非护理专业毕业生提供了获得护理学士学位的最快捷途径。大多数注册学生,尤其是毕业于艺术和哲学院校的学生,都是复杂而密集的护理课程的初学者,如重症监护和急救护理课程。这些学生在努力适应或融入这些复杂的护理课程时经历了一些压力和挑战,这些压力导致了学生的不满,并改变了学生的幸福感、学业成绩和增加了不及格率。目的:确定参加重症护理课程的速成班学生所感受到的压力源、解决压力的应对策略以及教师的支持。设计:研究包括定量和定性两个部分。定量研究采用描述性横断面研究设计。此外,在定性部分,采用了由一个开放式问题组成的定性调查,以深入了解问卷中未包含的其他压力因素。环境:研究在亚历山大大学护理学院重症护理系进行。样本:从重症护理课程(I 和 II)的所有注册学生中抽取同意参与研究的学生。工具:自我报告在线工具包包括三个工具,用于确定压力源、应对策略和教师支持,即:(1)学生护士压力指数量表(SNSI)。(2) 对所经历问题的应对取向量表(Brief-COPE),以及 (3) 感知到的教师支持量表(PFSS)。此外,定性调查还包括一个结构化的开放式问题,要求学生提及 SNSI 量表中未包含的其他压力或挑战,并/或就其压力因素提供更详细的说明。结果显示,"担心挂科 "被认为是所有学生中压力最大的。此外,两组学生采用的最高应对策略是 "与宗教有关的策略",而采用的最低适应性应对策略是 "幽默"。适应性应对方式与适应不良应对方式呈显著负相关(r = -0.374,p < 0.001),与感知教师支持量表呈显著正相关(r = 0.098,p = 0.027)。适应不良的应对方式与感知到的教师支持量表呈显著负相关(r = -0.244,p < 0.001)。这些相关性表明,压力水平越高,适应不良的应对方式就越多,感知到的教师支持就越少;而适应能力越强,适应不良的应对方式就越少,感知到的教师支持就越多。此外,对开放式问题的定性分析显示,出现最多的三个主题是:时间有限、学业负担太重和经济负担。结论根据本次研究的结果,可以得出结论:参与本次研究的所有学生都经历了压力。适应性应对方式与适应不良应对方式呈显著负相关,与感知教师支持量表呈显著正相关。而适应不良型应对方式与感知教师支持量表呈显著负相关。这些相关性表明,压力水平越高,适应不良的应对方式就越多,感知到的教师支持就越少;而适应能力越强,适应不良的应对方式就越少,感知到的教师支持就越多。最后,从定性调查分析中得出的学业繁重导致的时间有限和经济负担被绝大多数学生视为压力源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceived Stressors, Coping Strategies, And Faculty Support Among Critical Care Accelerated Nursing Students
Background : There is an increased and continuous demand for nurses. The accelerated nursing program is a fast-track entry-level program and offers the quickest route to provide a baccalaureate degree in nursing for non-nursing graduates. Most of the enrolled students, particularly those who graduated from art and philosophical colleges, are beginners in complex and dense nursing curricula, e.g. critical care and emergency nursing courses. Those students experienced several stressors and challenges while trying to adapt or integrate into these complex nursing courses and these stressors contributed to students’ dissatisfaction and altered students well-being, academic achievement, and increased failure rates. Aim: Determine the stressors, coping strategies used for stress resolution, and faculty support as perceived by accelerated students who enrolled in the critical care courses. Design: the study includes 2 parts quantitative and qualitative. For the quantitative part, a descriptive cross-sectional study design was employed. In addition, for the qualitative part. a qualitative survey consisting of one open-ended question was used to get an in-depth understanding of the other stressors that were not captured in the questionnaire. Setting: the study was conducted in the critical care nursing department at the faculty of nursing, Alexandria University. Sample: A convenience sampling of all students enrolled in the critical care nursing courses (I & II) who agreed to participate in the study were recruited. Tools: a self-reported online package included three tools used to determine stressors, coping strategies, and faculty support namely: (1) Student Nurse Stress Index Scale (SNSI). (2) Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief-COPE) Scale, and (3) Perceived Faculty Support Scale (PFSS). In addition, The qualitative survey consists of one structured open-ended question that asks the students to mention other stressors or challenges that were not captured in the SNSI and/or to provide more elaboration regarding their stressors. Results showed that the “fear of failing a course” was perceived as the most stressful among all students. In addition, the highest coping strategy adopted was “religion-related strategies”, and the lowest adaptive coping strategy adopted by both groups was “humor”. Adaptive coping styles had a significant negative correlation with maladaptive coping styles as (r = -0.374, p < 0.001) and a significant positive correlation with the perceived faculty support scale as (r = 0.098, p = 0.027). Maladaptive coping styles were significantly negatively correlated with the perceived faculty support scale as (r = -0.244, p < 0.001). These correlations suggest that higher stress levels were associated with more maladaptive coping styles and less perceived faculty support, while more adaptive coping styles were associated with less maladaptive and more perceived faculty support. Furthermore, qualitative analysis of the open-ended question revealed that the highest three themes that emerged were: limited time too much academic load, and financial burden. Conclusions: Based on the results of the current study, it could be concluded that all students who participated in this study were experiencing stressors. Adaptive coping styles had a significant negative correlation with maladaptive coping styles and a significant positive correlation with the perceived faculty support scale. While maladaptive coping styles were significantly negatively correlated with the perceived faculty support scale. These correlations suggest that higher stress levels were associated with more maladaptive coping styles and less perceived faculty support, while more adaptive coping styles were associated with less maladaptive and more perceived faculty support. Finally, limited time due to heavy academic loads, and financial burdens extracted from the analysis of the qualitative survey were identified as stressors by the vast majority of the students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Educational Guidelines about Coping Strategies on Anxiety and Depression among Women Post-Hysterectomy Household Health Behaviors and Maternal Stress During Covid-19 Outbreak Impact of Simulation-Guided by Training Lines on Nurses' Performance Caring for Children with Cochlear Implantation Families' Perception toward Application of Infection Control Precautions with Corona Virus at Home Barriers to Green Practice regarding Waste Management among Operating Room Nurses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1