爱自己的治疗师,怀疑自己的机构?治疗师和机构对疗效、治疗时间和辍学的影响。

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1080/10503307.2024.2352749
Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer, Miriam I Hehlmann, Julian A Rubel, Wolfgang Lutz, Brian Schwartz, Anne-Kathrin Bräscher, Hanna Christiansen, Lydia Fehm, Julia A Glombiewski, Jens Heider, Sylvia Helbig-Lang, Andrea Hermann, Jürgen Hoyer, Tina In-Albon, Tania Lincoln, Jürgen Margraf, Anne Katrin Risch, Henning Schöttke, Lars Schulze, Rudolf Stark, Tobias Teismann, Julia Velten, Ulrike Willutzki, Gabriele Wilz, Michael Witthöft, Patrizia Odyniec
{"title":"爱自己的治疗师,怀疑自己的机构?治疗师和机构对疗效、治疗时间和辍学的影响。","authors":"Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer, Miriam I Hehlmann, Julian A Rubel, Wolfgang Lutz, Brian Schwartz, Anne-Kathrin Bräscher, Hanna Christiansen, Lydia Fehm, Julia A Glombiewski, Jens Heider, Sylvia Helbig-Lang, Andrea Hermann, Jürgen Hoyer, Tina In-Albon, Tania Lincoln, Jürgen Margraf, Anne Katrin Risch, Henning Schöttke, Lars Schulze, Rudolf Stark, Tobias Teismann, Julia Velten, Ulrike Willutzki, Gabriele Wilz, Michael Witthöft, Patrizia Odyniec","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2352749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Research suggests that some therapists achieve better outcomes than others. However, an overlooked area of study is how institution differences impact patient outcomes independent of therapist variance. This study aimed to examine the role of institution and therapist differences in adult outpatient psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 1428 patients who were treated by 196 therapists at 10 clinics. Two- and three-level hierarchical linear regression models were employed to investigate the effects of therapists and institutions on three dependent patient variables: (1) symptom change, (2) treatment duration, and (3) dropout. Level three explanatory variables were tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that therapist effects (TE) were significant for all three types of treatment outcome (7.8%-18.2%). When a third level (institution) was added to the model, the differences between therapists decreased, and significant institution effects (IE) were found: 6.3% for symptom change, 10.6% for treatment duration, and 6.5% for dropout. The exploratory analyses found no predictors able to explain the systematic variation at the institution level.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>TE on psychotherapy outcomes remain a relevant factor but may have been overestimated in previous studies due to not properly distinguishing them from differences at the institution level.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Love yourself as a therapist, doubt yourself as an institution? Therapist and institution effects on outcome, treatment length, and dropout.\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer, Miriam I Hehlmann, Julian A Rubel, Wolfgang Lutz, Brian Schwartz, Anne-Kathrin Bräscher, Hanna Christiansen, Lydia Fehm, Julia A Glombiewski, Jens Heider, Sylvia Helbig-Lang, Andrea Hermann, Jürgen Hoyer, Tina In-Albon, Tania Lincoln, Jürgen Margraf, Anne Katrin Risch, Henning Schöttke, Lars Schulze, Rudolf Stark, Tobias Teismann, Julia Velten, Ulrike Willutzki, Gabriele Wilz, Michael Witthöft, Patrizia Odyniec\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2024.2352749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Research suggests that some therapists achieve better outcomes than others. However, an overlooked area of study is how institution differences impact patient outcomes independent of therapist variance. This study aimed to examine the role of institution and therapist differences in adult outpatient psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 1428 patients who were treated by 196 therapists at 10 clinics. Two- and three-level hierarchical linear regression models were employed to investigate the effects of therapists and institutions on three dependent patient variables: (1) symptom change, (2) treatment duration, and (3) dropout. Level three explanatory variables were tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that therapist effects (TE) were significant for all three types of treatment outcome (7.8%-18.2%). When a third level (institution) was added to the model, the differences between therapists decreased, and significant institution effects (IE) were found: 6.3% for symptom change, 10.6% for treatment duration, and 6.5% for dropout. The exploratory analyses found no predictors able to explain the systematic variation at the institution level.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>TE on psychotherapy outcomes remain a relevant factor but may have been overestimated in previous studies due to not properly distinguishing them from differences at the institution level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2352749\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2352749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究表明,一些治疗师比其他治疗师取得更好的治疗效果。然而,一个被忽视的研究领域是,在治疗师差异之外,机构差异如何影响患者的治疗效果。本研究旨在探讨机构和治疗师差异在成人门诊心理治疗中的作用:研究对象包括在 10 家诊所接受 196 名治疗师治疗的 1428 名患者。采用两级和三级分层线性回归模型来研究治疗师和治疗机构对患者三个因变量的影响:(1)症状变化;(2)治疗持续时间;(3)辍学。对三级解释变量进行了检验:结果显示,治疗师效应(TE)对三种治疗结果均有显著影响(7.8%-18.2%)。在模型中加入第三个层次(机构)后,治疗师之间的差异减小,并发现了显著的机构效应(IE):症状变化为 6.3%,治疗持续时间为 10.6%,辍学为 6.5%。探索性分析发现,没有任何预测因素能够解释机构层面的系统性差异:讨论:TE 对心理治疗结果的影响仍然是一个相关因素,但在以往的研究中可能被高估了,因为没有将其与机构层面的差异适当区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Love yourself as a therapist, doubt yourself as an institution? Therapist and institution effects on outcome, treatment length, and dropout.

Objective: Research suggests that some therapists achieve better outcomes than others. However, an overlooked area of study is how institution differences impact patient outcomes independent of therapist variance. This study aimed to examine the role of institution and therapist differences in adult outpatient psychotherapy.

Method: The study included 1428 patients who were treated by 196 therapists at 10 clinics. Two- and three-level hierarchical linear regression models were employed to investigate the effects of therapists and institutions on three dependent patient variables: (1) symptom change, (2) treatment duration, and (3) dropout. Level three explanatory variables were tested.

Results: The results showed that therapist effects (TE) were significant for all three types of treatment outcome (7.8%-18.2%). When a third level (institution) was added to the model, the differences between therapists decreased, and significant institution effects (IE) were found: 6.3% for symptom change, 10.6% for treatment duration, and 6.5% for dropout. The exploratory analyses found no predictors able to explain the systematic variation at the institution level.

Discussion: TE on psychotherapy outcomes remain a relevant factor but may have been overestimated in previous studies due to not properly distinguishing them from differences at the institution level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
期刊最新文献
A first look at diversity gaps in psychotherapy research publications and representation. Are perceptions of the psychotherapist affected by the audiovisual quality of a teletherapy session? Decentering as a mediator of the effect of mindfulness on emotional distress: Evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal designs. Therapists' emotional responses and their relation to patients' experience of attunement and responsiveness. Adolescent, caregivers, and therapists' experiences of youth and family suicide intervention: A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1