VATS 和 RATS)肺叶切除术后是否有必要每天进行常规胸部 X 光检查 (CXR)?

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY Surgery open science Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.010
Nathan J. Alcasid MD , Kian C. Banks MD , Sheng-Fang Jiang MS , Cynthia J. Susai MD , Diana Hsu MD , William Carroway MD , Kenneth Williams MD , Ashish Patel MD , Simon Ashiku MD , Jeffrey B. Velotta MD
{"title":"VATS 和 RATS)肺叶切除术后是否有必要每天进行常规胸部 X 光检查 (CXR)?","authors":"Nathan J. Alcasid MD ,&nbsp;Kian C. Banks MD ,&nbsp;Sheng-Fang Jiang MS ,&nbsp;Cynthia J. Susai MD ,&nbsp;Diana Hsu MD ,&nbsp;William Carroway MD ,&nbsp;Kenneth Williams MD ,&nbsp;Ashish Patel MD ,&nbsp;Simon Ashiku MD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey B. Velotta MD","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Consensus guidelines regarding the amount and necessity of post-operative imaging in thoracic surgery are lacking. The efficacy of daily chest radiographs (CXR) following video-assisted (VATS) and robotic-assisted (RATS) thoracoscopic surgery in directing management has not been previously studied. We hypothesize that abnormal clinical findings, rather than abnormal imaging findings, better predict post-operative complications in patients undergoing VATS/RATS lobectomies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of VATS and RATS lobectomy patients were performed at a tertiary referral center from 1/1/2019–12/31/2021. Demographics, hospital course, and imaging were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square test, Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank sum, and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Our outcomes were post-operative complications requiring a procedure and extended length of stay (LOS) (&gt;2 days post-operatively).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 362 VATS/RATS lobectomy patients, 15 patients had post-operative complications requiring a procedure. Almost all patients who required a procedure had abnormal clinical signs and symptoms (14/15; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) while 70 % had expected post-operative day (POD) one CXR findings (11/15; <em>p</em> = 0.463). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated clinical signs and symptoms independently predicted procedural requirement (odds ratio [OR] = 48, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]:8.5–267) while abnormal POD one imaging did not. For extended LOS, a positive smoking history (OR = 4.4, 95 % CI:1.4–14.1), number of CXRs (OR = 2.4, 95 % CI:1.8–3.2) and thoracostomy tubes (OR = 5.3, 95 % CI:1.0–27.3) were independent predictors while clinical signs and symptoms was not.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Abnormal clinical findings may guide management more predictably than abnormal CXRs after VATS/RATS. Routine CXR in the post-operative setting may be unnecessary in those without clinical signs or symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Key message</h3><p>There are no consensus guidelines regarding the efficacy of routine, post-operative diagnostic studies after major thoracic lobar resections. The presence of abnormal signs or symptoms after minimally invasive lobectomies may better predict those who will require additional procedures better than the presence of abnormal routine, post-operative chest radiographs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"20 ","pages":"Pages 20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000721/pdfft?md5=dcb502ca969faf20e7c0addbb81ea8a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024000721-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are routine, daily chest radiographs (CXR) necessary following (VATS and RATS) lobectomies?\",\"authors\":\"Nathan J. Alcasid MD ,&nbsp;Kian C. Banks MD ,&nbsp;Sheng-Fang Jiang MS ,&nbsp;Cynthia J. Susai MD ,&nbsp;Diana Hsu MD ,&nbsp;William Carroway MD ,&nbsp;Kenneth Williams MD ,&nbsp;Ashish Patel MD ,&nbsp;Simon Ashiku MD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey B. Velotta MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Consensus guidelines regarding the amount and necessity of post-operative imaging in thoracic surgery are lacking. The efficacy of daily chest radiographs (CXR) following video-assisted (VATS) and robotic-assisted (RATS) thoracoscopic surgery in directing management has not been previously studied. We hypothesize that abnormal clinical findings, rather than abnormal imaging findings, better predict post-operative complications in patients undergoing VATS/RATS lobectomies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of VATS and RATS lobectomy patients were performed at a tertiary referral center from 1/1/2019–12/31/2021. Demographics, hospital course, and imaging were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square test, Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank sum, and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Our outcomes were post-operative complications requiring a procedure and extended length of stay (LOS) (&gt;2 days post-operatively).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 362 VATS/RATS lobectomy patients, 15 patients had post-operative complications requiring a procedure. Almost all patients who required a procedure had abnormal clinical signs and symptoms (14/15; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) while 70 % had expected post-operative day (POD) one CXR findings (11/15; <em>p</em> = 0.463). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated clinical signs and symptoms independently predicted procedural requirement (odds ratio [OR] = 48, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]:8.5–267) while abnormal POD one imaging did not. For extended LOS, a positive smoking history (OR = 4.4, 95 % CI:1.4–14.1), number of CXRs (OR = 2.4, 95 % CI:1.8–3.2) and thoracostomy tubes (OR = 5.3, 95 % CI:1.0–27.3) were independent predictors while clinical signs and symptoms was not.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Abnormal clinical findings may guide management more predictably than abnormal CXRs after VATS/RATS. Routine CXR in the post-operative setting may be unnecessary in those without clinical signs or symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Key message</h3><p>There are no consensus guidelines regarding the efficacy of routine, post-operative diagnostic studies after major thoracic lobar resections. The presence of abnormal signs or symptoms after minimally invasive lobectomies may better predict those who will require additional procedures better than the presence of abnormal routine, post-operative chest radiographs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery open science\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 20-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000721/pdfft?md5=dcb502ca969faf20e7c0addbb81ea8a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024000721-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery open science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景关于胸腔镜手术术后成像的数量和必要性尚缺乏共识指南。之前尚未研究过视频辅助(VATS)和机器人辅助(RATS)胸腔镜手术后每日胸片(CXR)在指导管理方面的功效。我们假设,异常临床结果比异常影像学结果更能预测接受 VATS/RATS 肺叶切除术患者的术后并发症。方法在 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间,在一家三级转诊中心对 VATS 和 RATS 肺叶切除术患者进行了回顾性审查。对人口统计学、住院过程和影像学进行评估。我们采用了描述性统计、Chi-Square 检验、费雪精确检验、Wilcoxon 秩和检验以及多变量逻辑回归。结果 在 362 例 VATS/RATS 肺叶切除术患者中,15 例患者出现了需要进行手术的术后并发症。几乎所有需要进行手术的患者都有异常的临床症状和体征(14/15;P <;0.001),而 70% 的患者在术后第一天 (POD) 有预期的 CXR 结果(11/15;P = 0.463)。多变量逻辑回归表明,临床症状和体征可独立预测手术需求(几率比 [OR] = 48,95% 置信区间 [CI]:8.5-267),而 POD 1 影像异常则不能。对于延长 LOS 而言,阳性吸烟史(OR = 4.4,95 % CI:1.4-14.1)、CXR 检查次数(OR = 2.4,95 % CI:1.8-3.2)和胸腔造口管(OR = 5.3,95 % CI:1.0-27.3)是独立的预测因素,而临床症状和体征则不是。对于没有临床体征或症状的患者,术后常规 CXR 检查可能是不必要的。关键信息目前还没有关于胸大叶切除术后常规诊断检查有效性的共识指南。微创肺叶切除术后出现异常体征或症状可能比术后常规胸片异常更能预测需要进行其他手术的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are routine, daily chest radiographs (CXR) necessary following (VATS and RATS) lobectomies?

Background

Consensus guidelines regarding the amount and necessity of post-operative imaging in thoracic surgery are lacking. The efficacy of daily chest radiographs (CXR) following video-assisted (VATS) and robotic-assisted (RATS) thoracoscopic surgery in directing management has not been previously studied. We hypothesize that abnormal clinical findings, rather than abnormal imaging findings, better predict post-operative complications in patients undergoing VATS/RATS lobectomies.

Methods

A retrospective review of VATS and RATS lobectomy patients were performed at a tertiary referral center from 1/1/2019–12/31/2021. Demographics, hospital course, and imaging were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square test, Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank sum, and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Our outcomes were post-operative complications requiring a procedure and extended length of stay (LOS) (>2 days post-operatively).

Results

Out of 362 VATS/RATS lobectomy patients, 15 patients had post-operative complications requiring a procedure. Almost all patients who required a procedure had abnormal clinical signs and symptoms (14/15; p < 0.001) while 70 % had expected post-operative day (POD) one CXR findings (11/15; p = 0.463). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated clinical signs and symptoms independently predicted procedural requirement (odds ratio [OR] = 48, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]:8.5–267) while abnormal POD one imaging did not. For extended LOS, a positive smoking history (OR = 4.4, 95 % CI:1.4–14.1), number of CXRs (OR = 2.4, 95 % CI:1.8–3.2) and thoracostomy tubes (OR = 5.3, 95 % CI:1.0–27.3) were independent predictors while clinical signs and symptoms was not.

Conclusion

Abnormal clinical findings may guide management more predictably than abnormal CXRs after VATS/RATS. Routine CXR in the post-operative setting may be unnecessary in those without clinical signs or symptoms.

Key message

There are no consensus guidelines regarding the efficacy of routine, post-operative diagnostic studies after major thoracic lobar resections. The presence of abnormal signs or symptoms after minimally invasive lobectomies may better predict those who will require additional procedures better than the presence of abnormal routine, post-operative chest radiographs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Management of Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: A systematic review of national and International Clinical Guidelines (CoSMIC-G) Primary delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy: A matched-pair comparison of Roux-en-Y vs. Billroth-II reconstruction Immersive collaborative virtual reality for case-based graduate student teaching in thoracic surgery: A piloting study Engagement and learning approaches among medical students in an online surgical teaching programme: A cross-sectional study Gender and age specific dynamics of health-related postoperative outcome measures following the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1