青光眼与自我视力、视力问题和健康状况较差有关:59 168 份问卷调查结果

Jens Rovelt , Josefine Freiberg , Marcel Reimann , Marianne Benn , Christian Torp-Pedersen , Miriam Kolko , FOREVER consortium
{"title":"青光眼与自我视力、视力问题和健康状况较差有关:59 168 份问卷调查结果","authors":"Jens Rovelt ,&nbsp;Josefine Freiberg ,&nbsp;Marcel Reimann ,&nbsp;Marianne Benn ,&nbsp;Christian Torp-Pedersen ,&nbsp;Miriam Kolko ,&nbsp;FOREVER consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to examine self-rated vision, vision concerns, and general health in individuals with and without glaucoma. Such assessments offer a broad view of a person's overall well-being and potential health issues and provide valuable insights into the characteristics of glaucoma patients.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used questionnaire responses from Project FOREVER (Finding Ophthalmic Risk and Evaluating the Value of Eye exams and their predictive Reliability) to evaluate self-rated vision and general health on a scale ranging from 1 (excellent), 2 (good), 3 (reasonable), 4 (poor) to 5 (very bad). Additionally, the vision concerns were rated on a scale from 1 (never), 2 (rarely), 3 (once in a while), 4 (often) to 5 (always). A glaucoma diagnosis was self-reported and obtained from the questionnaire. To investigate the strength and direction of associations, we used binomial logistic regression models including self-assessment, age, and sex as confounding variables and glaucoma status as the dependent variable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study analyzed questionnaire data from 59,168 participants, with an average age of 55.2 years (SD 15.0), and 62.0 % being women. Of these, 900 individuals (1.5 %) reported having a glaucoma diagnosis. Individuals having glaucoma reported poorer self-ratings in vision, vision concerns and general health. Specifically, the odds ratios for the poorest ratings were 2.46 for self-rated vision (95 % CI 1.70–3.55, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), 8.04 for self-rated vision concerns (95 % CI 5.44–11.90, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and 1.86 for self-rated health (95 % CI 1.16–2.98, <em>p</em> = 0.010).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Glaucoma status is associated with poorer self-assessments of vision, vision concerns, and health. This suggests that individuals with glaucoma experience more vision and health challenges than people without the disease and the three assessments can be used as tools to characterize glaucoma patients in risk profiling efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000352/pdfft?md5=263099f4f6713fc39a3e7e148b78eab4&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000352-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glaucoma is associated with poorer self-rated vision, vision concerns and health: Results from 59,168 questionnaire responses\",\"authors\":\"Jens Rovelt ,&nbsp;Josefine Freiberg ,&nbsp;Marcel Reimann ,&nbsp;Marianne Benn ,&nbsp;Christian Torp-Pedersen ,&nbsp;Miriam Kolko ,&nbsp;FOREVER consortium\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to examine self-rated vision, vision concerns, and general health in individuals with and without glaucoma. Such assessments offer a broad view of a person's overall well-being and potential health issues and provide valuable insights into the characteristics of glaucoma patients.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used questionnaire responses from Project FOREVER (Finding Ophthalmic Risk and Evaluating the Value of Eye exams and their predictive Reliability) to evaluate self-rated vision and general health on a scale ranging from 1 (excellent), 2 (good), 3 (reasonable), 4 (poor) to 5 (very bad). Additionally, the vision concerns were rated on a scale from 1 (never), 2 (rarely), 3 (once in a while), 4 (often) to 5 (always). A glaucoma diagnosis was self-reported and obtained from the questionnaire. To investigate the strength and direction of associations, we used binomial logistic regression models including self-assessment, age, and sex as confounding variables and glaucoma status as the dependent variable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study analyzed questionnaire data from 59,168 participants, with an average age of 55.2 years (SD 15.0), and 62.0 % being women. Of these, 900 individuals (1.5 %) reported having a glaucoma diagnosis. Individuals having glaucoma reported poorer self-ratings in vision, vision concerns and general health. Specifically, the odds ratios for the poorest ratings were 2.46 for self-rated vision (95 % CI 1.70–3.55, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), 8.04 for self-rated vision concerns (95 % CI 5.44–11.90, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and 1.86 for self-rated health (95 % CI 1.16–2.98, <em>p</em> = 0.010).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Glaucoma status is associated with poorer self-assessments of vision, vision concerns, and health. This suggests that individuals with glaucoma experience more vision and health challenges than people without the disease and the three assessments can be used as tools to characterize glaucoma patients in risk profiling efforts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJO International\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000352/pdfft?md5=263099f4f6713fc39a3e7e148b78eab4&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000352-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJO International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在调查青光眼患者和非青光眼患者的自评视力、视力问题和总体健康状况。这些评估能广泛反映一个人的整体健康状况和潜在的健康问题,并能为了解青光眼患者的特征提供有价值的信息。方法我们利用 FOREVER 项目(发现眼科风险和评估眼科检查的价值及其预测可靠性)的问卷调查来评估自评视力和一般健康状况,评分标准从 1(极好)、2(好)、3(一般)、4(差)到 5(非常差)不等。此外,视力问题的评分标准为 1(从不)、2(很少)、3(偶尔)、4(经常)到 5(总是)。青光眼的诊断是通过自我报告和问卷调查获得的。为了研究两者关联的强度和方向,我们使用了二项式逻辑回归模型,将自我评估、年龄和性别作为混杂变量,将青光眼状态作为因变量。 结果这项研究分析了 59 168 名参与者的问卷数据,参与者的平均年龄为 55.2 岁(SD 15.0),女性占 62.0%。其中有 900 人(1.5%)被诊断出患有青光眼。患有青光眼的人在视力、视力问题和一般健康方面的自我评分较低。具体而言,视力自评最差的几率为 2.46(95 % CI 1.70-3.55,p <0.001),视力问题自评最差的几率为 8.04(95 % CI 5.44-11.90,p <0.001),健康自评最差的几率为 1.86(95 % CI 1.16-2.98,p = 0.010)。这表明,青光眼患者比非青光眼患者面临更多的视力和健康挑战,这三种评估可用作风险分析工作中描述青光眼患者特征的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Glaucoma is associated with poorer self-rated vision, vision concerns and health: Results from 59,168 questionnaire responses

Purpose

This study aimed to examine self-rated vision, vision concerns, and general health in individuals with and without glaucoma. Such assessments offer a broad view of a person's overall well-being and potential health issues and provide valuable insights into the characteristics of glaucoma patients.

Design

Cross-sectional.

Methods

We used questionnaire responses from Project FOREVER (Finding Ophthalmic Risk and Evaluating the Value of Eye exams and their predictive Reliability) to evaluate self-rated vision and general health on a scale ranging from 1 (excellent), 2 (good), 3 (reasonable), 4 (poor) to 5 (very bad). Additionally, the vision concerns were rated on a scale from 1 (never), 2 (rarely), 3 (once in a while), 4 (often) to 5 (always). A glaucoma diagnosis was self-reported and obtained from the questionnaire. To investigate the strength and direction of associations, we used binomial logistic regression models including self-assessment, age, and sex as confounding variables and glaucoma status as the dependent variable.

Results

This study analyzed questionnaire data from 59,168 participants, with an average age of 55.2 years (SD 15.0), and 62.0 % being women. Of these, 900 individuals (1.5 %) reported having a glaucoma diagnosis. Individuals having glaucoma reported poorer self-ratings in vision, vision concerns and general health. Specifically, the odds ratios for the poorest ratings were 2.46 for self-rated vision (95 % CI 1.70–3.55, p < 0.001), 8.04 for self-rated vision concerns (95 % CI 5.44–11.90, p < 0.001) and 1.86 for self-rated health (95 % CI 1.16–2.98, p = 0.010).

Conclusion

Glaucoma status is associated with poorer self-assessments of vision, vision concerns, and health. This suggests that individuals with glaucoma experience more vision and health challenges than people without the disease and the three assessments can be used as tools to characterize glaucoma patients in risk profiling efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intravitreal dexamethasone implant concomitant to cataract surgery in retinitis pigmentosa: potential retinal preservation effect FaceFinder: A machine learning tool for identification of facial images from heterogenous datasets Gender based differences in electronic medical record utilization in an academic ophthalmology practice Evolving practice patterns of young retinal specialists: A five-year comparison of treatment and surgical preferences Candida parapsilosis keratitis: A case series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1