从实验到干预:从研究到应用:扩大海洋生态工程规模的案例研究

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103800
Maria L. Vozzo , Melanie J. Bishop , Katherine A. Dafforn , Peter D. Steinberg , Elisabeth M.A. Strain , Mariana Mayer Pinto
{"title":"从实验到干预:从研究到应用:扩大海洋生态工程规模的案例研究","authors":"Maria L. Vozzo ,&nbsp;Melanie J. Bishop ,&nbsp;Katherine A. Dafforn ,&nbsp;Peter D. Steinberg ,&nbsp;Elisabeth M.A. Strain ,&nbsp;Mariana Mayer Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ecosystems globally are becoming increasingly degraded necessitating conservation and repair. Alongside restoration of natural habitats, eco-engineering can mitigate the negative impacts of urban seascapes by co-designing marine-built structures for nature as well as humans. The application of eco-engineering to marine built structures is supported by over two decades of research demonstrating the efficacy of this approach in enhancing biodiversity but there remain few examples of interventions moving beyond experimental- to large-scale (10–100 s m) and long-term (decadal) implementation. Using lessons learned from eco-engineering research in Sydney Harbour, Australia, we outline six key steps that facilitate moving from experimental to larger scale retrofitted eco-engineering interventions. These are: (1) identifying the ecological problem and the most tractable solutions; (2) engaging with stakeholders, (3) obtaining approvals, (4) establishing demonstration sites that illustrate to stakeholders the practicality and benefits of the solution, (5) building an evidence base for efficacy of the solution, and (6) scaling up supply. Our framework draws on learnings from the Living Seawalls project, and on the extensive small-scale experimentation that led to it. Living Seawalls is an eco-engineering initiative that grew out of Sydney Harbour and has now been applied to sites across Australia and globally. Our framework also draws on learnings from other existing projects (e.g. Ecostructure, Blue Cube) and frameworks (e.g. Greening the Grey, International Guidelines on Natural and Nature-Based Features for Flood Risk Management) developed elsewhere. This work provides a template by which scientists can work with policy makers, managers, and other stakeholders to effect positive environmental change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001345/pdfft?md5=f1e9b3de22c180e1ae3cb3c980275985&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124001345-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From experiment to intervention: A case study of scaling up marine eco-engineering from research to application\",\"authors\":\"Maria L. Vozzo ,&nbsp;Melanie J. Bishop ,&nbsp;Katherine A. Dafforn ,&nbsp;Peter D. Steinberg ,&nbsp;Elisabeth M.A. Strain ,&nbsp;Mariana Mayer Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ecosystems globally are becoming increasingly degraded necessitating conservation and repair. Alongside restoration of natural habitats, eco-engineering can mitigate the negative impacts of urban seascapes by co-designing marine-built structures for nature as well as humans. The application of eco-engineering to marine built structures is supported by over two decades of research demonstrating the efficacy of this approach in enhancing biodiversity but there remain few examples of interventions moving beyond experimental- to large-scale (10–100 s m) and long-term (decadal) implementation. Using lessons learned from eco-engineering research in Sydney Harbour, Australia, we outline six key steps that facilitate moving from experimental to larger scale retrofitted eco-engineering interventions. These are: (1) identifying the ecological problem and the most tractable solutions; (2) engaging with stakeholders, (3) obtaining approvals, (4) establishing demonstration sites that illustrate to stakeholders the practicality and benefits of the solution, (5) building an evidence base for efficacy of the solution, and (6) scaling up supply. Our framework draws on learnings from the Living Seawalls project, and on the extensive small-scale experimentation that led to it. Living Seawalls is an eco-engineering initiative that grew out of Sydney Harbour and has now been applied to sites across Australia and globally. Our framework also draws on learnings from other existing projects (e.g. Ecostructure, Blue Cube) and frameworks (e.g. Greening the Grey, International Guidelines on Natural and Nature-Based Features for Flood Risk Management) developed elsewhere. This work provides a template by which scientists can work with policy makers, managers, and other stakeholders to effect positive environmental change.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001345/pdfft?md5=f1e9b3de22c180e1ae3cb3c980275985&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124001345-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001345\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球生态系统日益退化,需要进行保护和修复。在恢复自然栖息地的同时,生态工程可以通过为自然和人类共同设计海洋建筑结构来减轻城市海景的负面影响。生态工程在海洋建筑结构中的应用得到了二十多年来研究的支持,这些研究表明这种方法在提高生物多样性方面非常有效,但从实验到大规模(10-100 s m)和长期(十年)实施干预措施的例子仍然很少。利用从澳大利亚悉尼港生态工程研究中汲取的经验教训,我们概述了六个关键步骤,这些步骤有助于从试验性干预转向更大规模的生态工程改造。这些步骤是(1) 确定生态问题和最可行的解决方案;(2) 与利益相关者接触;(3) 获得批准;(4) 建立示范点,向利益相关者说明解决方案的实用性和益处;(5) 为解决方案的有效性建立证据基础;(6) 扩大供应。我们的框架借鉴了 "活海堤 "项目的经验,以及促成该项目的广泛小规模实验。Living Seawalls 是一项生态工程计划,由悉尼港发展而来,现已应用于澳大利亚和全球各地。我们的框架还借鉴了其他现有项目(如生态结构、蓝立方)和框架(如 "绿化灰色地带"、洪水风险管理自然和基于自然特征的国际准则)。这项工作提供了一个模板,科学家可以据此与决策者、管理者和其他利益相关者合作,实现积极的环境变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From experiment to intervention: A case study of scaling up marine eco-engineering from research to application

Ecosystems globally are becoming increasingly degraded necessitating conservation and repair. Alongside restoration of natural habitats, eco-engineering can mitigate the negative impacts of urban seascapes by co-designing marine-built structures for nature as well as humans. The application of eco-engineering to marine built structures is supported by over two decades of research demonstrating the efficacy of this approach in enhancing biodiversity but there remain few examples of interventions moving beyond experimental- to large-scale (10–100 s m) and long-term (decadal) implementation. Using lessons learned from eco-engineering research in Sydney Harbour, Australia, we outline six key steps that facilitate moving from experimental to larger scale retrofitted eco-engineering interventions. These are: (1) identifying the ecological problem and the most tractable solutions; (2) engaging with stakeholders, (3) obtaining approvals, (4) establishing demonstration sites that illustrate to stakeholders the practicality and benefits of the solution, (5) building an evidence base for efficacy of the solution, and (6) scaling up supply. Our framework draws on learnings from the Living Seawalls project, and on the extensive small-scale experimentation that led to it. Living Seawalls is an eco-engineering initiative that grew out of Sydney Harbour and has now been applied to sites across Australia and globally. Our framework also draws on learnings from other existing projects (e.g. Ecostructure, Blue Cube) and frameworks (e.g. Greening the Grey, International Guidelines on Natural and Nature-Based Features for Flood Risk Management) developed elsewhere. This work provides a template by which scientists can work with policy makers, managers, and other stakeholders to effect positive environmental change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Attending to the unattended: Why and how do local governments plan for access and functional needs in climate risk reduction? Beyond Academia: A case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research Of heroes and villains – How coalitions shape their narratives and what the public conservation debate is actually about? Enhancing meaningful Indigenous leadership and collaboration in international environmental governance forums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1