抗血管内皮生长因子治疗新生血管性老年黄斑变性的心血管风险。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.05.013
David D Chong, Christopher M Maatouk, Jonathan Markle, Jacqueline K Shaia, Rishi P Singh, Katherine E Talcott
{"title":"抗血管内皮生长因子治疗新生血管性老年黄斑变性的心血管风险。","authors":"David D Chong, Christopher M Maatouk, Jonathan Markle, Jacqueline K Shaia, Rishi P Singh, Katherine E Talcott","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess 5-year all-cause mortality (ACM), hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) risks in nAMD patients receiving anti-VEGF injections compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Population-based retrospective cohort study using a U.S. federated health research network, containing de-identified data of 96 million patients from 1/1/2003 to 3/6/2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>nAMD Patients with anti-VEGF injections. Controls included nAMD patients without anti-VEGF injections, non-exudative AMD patients, and patients without AMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified using nAMD ICD-10 and anti-VEGF CPT codes and matched for age, sex, and comorbidities. Five-year relative risk of ACM (RR<sub>1</sub>), hemorrhagic stroke (RR<sub>2</sub>), ischemic stroke (RR<sub>3</sub>), and MI (RR<sub>4</sub>) in nAMD patients receiving anti-VEGF injections were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27,609 nAMD patients (mean diagnosis age [SD], [78.2 (10.3)]) received anti-VEGF injections; 769 nAMD patients without injections (75.8 [12.2]), 27,599 non-exudative AMD patients (78.2 [10.3]), and 21,902 no-AMD patients (76.1 [10.5]) were identified. After matching, nAMD patients receiving injections did not show increased risk versus nAMD patients without injections (RR<sub>1</sub>, 0.66; 95% CI [0.53, 0.82]), (RR<sub>2</sub>, 1.00 [0.42, 2.38]), (RR<sub>3</sub>, 1.70 [0.92,3.13]), (RR<sub>4</sub>, 0.63 [0.33, 1.18]). No increased risk was found compared to non-exudative AMD patients (RR<sub>1</sub>, 0.99 [0.95, 1.03]), (RR<sub>2</sub>, 0.94 [0.83,1.07]), (RR<sub>3</sub>, 1.04 [0.96, 1.12]), (RR<sub>4</sub>, 0.99 [0.91, 1.08]). Increased risk for ACM was observed versus no-AMD patients (RR<sub>1</sub>, 1.21 [1.15, 1.27]), but no other differences were found (RR<sub>2</sub>, 0.81 [0.70, 0.93]), (RR<sub>3</sub>, 1.00 [0.92, 1.09]), (RR<sub>4</sub>, 0.986 [0.90, 1.09]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anti-VEGF injections were not associated with major cardiovascular events in nAMD patients over 5 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular risk in anti-VEGF treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.\",\"authors\":\"David D Chong, Christopher M Maatouk, Jonathan Markle, Jacqueline K Shaia, Rishi P Singh, Katherine E Talcott\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.05.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess 5-year all-cause mortality (ACM), hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) risks in nAMD patients receiving anti-VEGF injections compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Population-based retrospective cohort study using a U.S. federated health research network, containing de-identified data of 96 million patients from 1/1/2003 to 3/6/2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>nAMD Patients with anti-VEGF injections. Controls included nAMD patients without anti-VEGF injections, non-exudative AMD patients, and patients without AMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified using nAMD ICD-10 and anti-VEGF CPT codes and matched for age, sex, and comorbidities. Five-year relative risk of ACM (RR<sub>1</sub>), hemorrhagic stroke (RR<sub>2</sub>), ischemic stroke (RR<sub>3</sub>), and MI (RR<sub>4</sub>) in nAMD patients receiving anti-VEGF injections were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27,609 nAMD patients (mean diagnosis age [SD], [78.2 (10.3)]) received anti-VEGF injections; 769 nAMD patients without injections (75.8 [12.2]), 27,599 non-exudative AMD patients (78.2 [10.3]), and 21,902 no-AMD patients (76.1 [10.5]) were identified. After matching, nAMD patients receiving injections did not show increased risk versus nAMD patients without injections (RR<sub>1</sub>, 0.66; 95% CI [0.53, 0.82]), (RR<sub>2</sub>, 1.00 [0.42, 2.38]), (RR<sub>3</sub>, 1.70 [0.92,3.13]), (RR<sub>4</sub>, 0.63 [0.33, 1.18]). No increased risk was found compared to non-exudative AMD patients (RR<sub>1</sub>, 0.99 [0.95, 1.03]), (RR<sub>2</sub>, 0.94 [0.83,1.07]), (RR<sub>3</sub>, 1.04 [0.96, 1.12]), (RR<sub>4</sub>, 0.99 [0.91, 1.08]). Increased risk for ACM was observed versus no-AMD patients (RR<sub>1</sub>, 1.21 [1.15, 1.27]), but no other differences were found (RR<sub>2</sub>, 0.81 [0.70, 0.93]), (RR<sub>3</sub>, 1.00 [0.92, 1.09]), (RR<sub>4</sub>, 0.986 [0.90, 1.09]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anti-VEGF injections were not associated with major cardiovascular events in nAMD patients over 5 years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.05.013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.05.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:评估接受抗血管内皮生长因子注射的 nAMD 患者的 5 年全因死亡率(ACM)、出血性中风、缺血性中风和心肌梗死(MI)风险:与对照组相比,评估接受抗血管内皮生长因子注射的 nAMD 患者的 5 年全因死亡率 (ACM)、出血性中风、缺血性中风和心肌梗死 (MI) 风险:设计:基于人群的回顾性队列研究,使用美国联合健康研究网络,包含 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 3 日期间 9600 万患者的去标识化数据。对照组包括未注射抗血管内皮生长因子的 nAMD 患者、非渗出性 AMD 患者和无 AMD 患者:使用 nAMD ICD-10 和抗血管内皮生长因子 CPT 编码识别患者,并进行年龄、性别和合并症匹配。计算接受抗血管内皮生长因子注射的 nAMD 患者发生 ACM(RR1)、出血性中风(RR2)、缺血性中风(RR3)和心肌梗死(RR4)的五年相对风险:共有 27,609 名 nAMD 患者(平均诊断年龄 [SD],[78.2 (10.3)])接受了抗血管内皮生长因子注射;769 名未接受注射的 nAMD 患者(75.8 [12.2])、27,599 名非渗出性 AMD 患者(78.2 [10.3])和 21,902 名非 AMD 患者(76.1 [10.5])接受了抗血管内皮生长因子注射。匹配后,接受注射的非渗出性 AMD 患者与未接受注射的非渗出性 AMD 患者相比,风险未见增加(RR1,0.66;95% CI [0.53,0.82]),(RR2,1.00 [0.42,2.38]),(RR3,1.70 [0.92,3.13]),(RR4,0.63 [0.33,1.18])。与非渗出性 AMD 患者相比,未发现风险增加(RR1,0.99 [0.95,1.03])、(RR2,0.94 [0.83,1.07])、(RR3,1.04 [0.96,1.12])、(RR4,0.99 [0.91,1.08])。与非 AMD 患者相比,观察到 ACM 风险增加(RR1,1.21 [1.15,1.27]),但未发现其他差异(RR2,0.81 [0.70,0.93])、(RR3,1.00 [0.92,1.09])、(RR4,0.986 [0.90,1.09]):抗 VEGF 注射与 nAMD 患者 5 年内的主要心血管事件无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiovascular risk in anti-VEGF treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Objective: Assess 5-year all-cause mortality (ACM), hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) risks in nAMD patients receiving anti-VEGF injections compared with controls.

Design: Population-based retrospective cohort study using a U.S. federated health research network, containing de-identified data of 96 million patients from 1/1/2003 to 3/6/2023.

Participants: nAMD Patients with anti-VEGF injections. Controls included nAMD patients without anti-VEGF injections, non-exudative AMD patients, and patients without AMD.

Methods: Patients were identified using nAMD ICD-10 and anti-VEGF CPT codes and matched for age, sex, and comorbidities. Five-year relative risk of ACM (RR1), hemorrhagic stroke (RR2), ischemic stroke (RR3), and MI (RR4) in nAMD patients receiving anti-VEGF injections were calculated.

Results: A total of 27,609 nAMD patients (mean diagnosis age [SD], [78.2 (10.3)]) received anti-VEGF injections; 769 nAMD patients without injections (75.8 [12.2]), 27,599 non-exudative AMD patients (78.2 [10.3]), and 21,902 no-AMD patients (76.1 [10.5]) were identified. After matching, nAMD patients receiving injections did not show increased risk versus nAMD patients without injections (RR1, 0.66; 95% CI [0.53, 0.82]), (RR2, 1.00 [0.42, 2.38]), (RR3, 1.70 [0.92,3.13]), (RR4, 0.63 [0.33, 1.18]). No increased risk was found compared to non-exudative AMD patients (RR1, 0.99 [0.95, 1.03]), (RR2, 0.94 [0.83,1.07]), (RR3, 1.04 [0.96, 1.12]), (RR4, 0.99 [0.91, 1.08]). Increased risk for ACM was observed versus no-AMD patients (RR1, 1.21 [1.15, 1.27]), but no other differences were found (RR2, 0.81 [0.70, 0.93]), (RR3, 1.00 [0.92, 1.09]), (RR4, 0.986 [0.90, 1.09]).

Conclusion: Anti-VEGF injections were not associated with major cardiovascular events in nAMD patients over 5 years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1