利用多保真蒙特卡洛和多项式混沌扩展对血管血流动力学进行全局敏感性分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1002/cnm.3836
Friederike Schäfer, Daniele E. Schiavazzi, Leif Rune Hellevik, Jacob Sturdy
{"title":"利用多保真蒙特卡洛和多项式混沌扩展对血管血流动力学进行全局敏感性分析。","authors":"Friederike Schäfer,&nbsp;Daniele E. Schiavazzi,&nbsp;Leif Rune Hellevik,&nbsp;Jacob Sturdy","doi":"10.1002/cnm.3836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Computational models of the cardiovascular system are increasingly used for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Before being used for translational applications, the predictive abilities of these models need to be thoroughly demonstrated through verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification. When results depend on multiple uncertain inputs, sensitivity analysis is typically the first step required to separate relevant from unimportant inputs, and is key to determine an initial reduction on the problem dimensionality that will significantly affect the cost of all downstream analysis tasks. For computationally expensive models with numerous uncertain inputs, sample-based sensitivity analysis may become impractical due to the substantial number of model evaluations it typically necessitates. To overcome this limitation, we consider recently proposed Multifidelity Monte Carlo estimators for Sobol’ sensitivity indices, and demonstrate their applicability to an idealized model of the common carotid artery. Variance reduction is achieved combining a small number of three-dimensional fluid–structure interaction simulations with affordable one- and zero-dimensional reduced-order models. These multifidelity Monte Carlo estimators are compared with traditional Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos expansion estimates. Specifically, we show consistent sensitivity ranks for both bi- (1D/0D) and tri-fidelity (3D/1D/0D) estimators, and superior variance reduction compared to traditional single-fidelity Monte Carlo estimators for the same computational budget. As the computational burden of Monte Carlo estimators for Sobol’ indices is significantly affected by the problem dimensionality, polynomial chaos expansion is found to have lower computational cost for idealized models with smooth stochastic response.</p>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global sensitivity analysis with multifidelity Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos expansion for vascular haemodynamics\",\"authors\":\"Friederike Schäfer,&nbsp;Daniele E. Schiavazzi,&nbsp;Leif Rune Hellevik,&nbsp;Jacob Sturdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnm.3836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Computational models of the cardiovascular system are increasingly used for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Before being used for translational applications, the predictive abilities of these models need to be thoroughly demonstrated through verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification. When results depend on multiple uncertain inputs, sensitivity analysis is typically the first step required to separate relevant from unimportant inputs, and is key to determine an initial reduction on the problem dimensionality that will significantly affect the cost of all downstream analysis tasks. For computationally expensive models with numerous uncertain inputs, sample-based sensitivity analysis may become impractical due to the substantial number of model evaluations it typically necessitates. To overcome this limitation, we consider recently proposed Multifidelity Monte Carlo estimators for Sobol’ sensitivity indices, and demonstrate their applicability to an idealized model of the common carotid artery. Variance reduction is achieved combining a small number of three-dimensional fluid–structure interaction simulations with affordable one- and zero-dimensional reduced-order models. These multifidelity Monte Carlo estimators are compared with traditional Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos expansion estimates. Specifically, we show consistent sensitivity ranks for both bi- (1D/0D) and tri-fidelity (3D/1D/0D) estimators, and superior variance reduction compared to traditional single-fidelity Monte Carlo estimators for the same computational budget. As the computational burden of Monte Carlo estimators for Sobol’ indices is significantly affected by the problem dimensionality, polynomial chaos expansion is found to have lower computational cost for idealized models with smooth stochastic response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.3836\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.3836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心血管系统的计算模型越来越多地用于心血管疾病的诊断、治疗和预防。在用于转化应用之前,需要通过验证、确认和不确定性量化来彻底证明这些模型的预测能力。当结果取决于多个不确定输入时,灵敏度分析通常是区分相关输入和不重要输入所需的第一步,也是确定初步降低问题维度的关键,这将显著影响所有下游分析任务的成本。对于具有大量不确定输入的计算昂贵的模型,基于样本的灵敏度分析可能会变得不切实际,因为它通常需要对模型进行大量评估。为了克服这一限制,我们考虑了最近提出的 Sobol 敏感性指数多保真度蒙特卡罗估计器,并演示了其在颈总动脉理想化模型中的适用性。通过将少量三维流体-结构相互作用模拟与经济实惠的一维和零维降阶模型相结合,实现了方差的降低。我们将这些多保真度蒙特卡洛估计器与传统的蒙特卡洛估计器和多项式混沌扩展估计器进行了比较。具体而言,我们展示了双保真(1D/0D)和三保真(3D/1D/0D)估计器一致的灵敏度排名,以及在相同计算预算下与传统单保真蒙特卡罗估计器相比更优越的方差缩小。由于 Sobol'指数的蒙特卡罗估计器的计算负担受问题维度的影响很大,因此对于具有平滑随机响应的理想化模型,多项式混沌扩展的计算成本较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global sensitivity analysis with multifidelity Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos expansion for vascular haemodynamics

Computational models of the cardiovascular system are increasingly used for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Before being used for translational applications, the predictive abilities of these models need to be thoroughly demonstrated through verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification. When results depend on multiple uncertain inputs, sensitivity analysis is typically the first step required to separate relevant from unimportant inputs, and is key to determine an initial reduction on the problem dimensionality that will significantly affect the cost of all downstream analysis tasks. For computationally expensive models with numerous uncertain inputs, sample-based sensitivity analysis may become impractical due to the substantial number of model evaluations it typically necessitates. To overcome this limitation, we consider recently proposed Multifidelity Monte Carlo estimators for Sobol’ sensitivity indices, and demonstrate their applicability to an idealized model of the common carotid artery. Variance reduction is achieved combining a small number of three-dimensional fluid–structure interaction simulations with affordable one- and zero-dimensional reduced-order models. These multifidelity Monte Carlo estimators are compared with traditional Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos expansion estimates. Specifically, we show consistent sensitivity ranks for both bi- (1D/0D) and tri-fidelity (3D/1D/0D) estimators, and superior variance reduction compared to traditional single-fidelity Monte Carlo estimators for the same computational budget. As the computational burden of Monte Carlo estimators for Sobol’ indices is significantly affected by the problem dimensionality, polynomial chaos expansion is found to have lower computational cost for idealized models with smooth stochastic response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Effect of Targeted Deployment Filling Coils in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms. Modeling Fibrin Accumulation on Flow-Diverting Devices for Intracranial Aneurysms. A comparison of machine learning methods for recovering noisy and missing 4D flow MRI data. A semi-automatic method for block-structured hexahedral meshing of aortic dissections. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of a healthy aortic valve and its surrounding haemodynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1